The use of personal protection equipment does not negatively affect paramedics' attention and dexterity: a prospective triple-cross over randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2022-01, Vol.30 (1), p.2-2, Article 2
• Main Authors: Kienbacher, Calvin Lukas, Grafeneder, Jürgen, Tscherny, Katharina, Krammel, Mario, Fuhrmann, Verena, Niederer, Maximilian, Neudorfsky, Sabine, Herbich, Klaus, Schreiber, Wolfgang, Herkner, Harald, Roth, Dominik
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Allied Health Personnel; Attention; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Concentration; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; CPR; Cross-Over Studies; Emergency medical care; Emergency medical personnel; Emergency medicine; Emergency services; Humans; Investigations; Masks; Medical personnel; Medical supplies; Neurocognition; Original Research; Pandemics; Personal protection equipment; Personal Protective Equipment; Prospective Studies; Protective clothing; Psychological aspects; Quality management; Safety and security measures; SARS-CoV-2; Ventilators
• ISSN: 1757-7241; 1757-7241
• DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00990-3

The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread use of personal protection equipment (PPE), including filtering face piece (FFP) masks, throughout the world. PPE. Previous studies indicate that PPE impairs neurocognitive performance in healthcare workers. Concerns for personnel safety have led to special recommendations regarding basic life support (BLS) in patients with a potential SARS-CoV-2 infection, including the use of PPE. Established instruments are available to assess attention and dexterity in BLS settings, respectively. We aimed to evaluate the influence of PPE with different types of FFP masks on these two neuropsychological components of EMS personnel during BLS. This was a randomized controlled non-inferiority triple-crossover study. Teams of paramedics completed three 12-min long BLS scenarios on a manikin after having climbed three flights of stairs with equipment, each in three experimental conditions: (a) without pandemic PPE, (b) with PPE including a FFP2 mask with an expiration valve and (c) with PPE including an FFP2 mask without an expiration valve. The teams and intervention sequences were randomized. We measured the shift in concentration performance using the d2 test and dexterity using the nine-hole peg test (NHPT). We compared results between the three conditions. For the primary outcome, the non-inferiority margin was set at 20 points. Forty-eight paramedics participated. Concentration performance was significantly better after each scenario, with no differences noted between groups: d2 shift control versus with valve - 8.3 (95% CI - 19.4 to 2.7) points; control versus without valve - 8.5 (- 19.7 to 2.7) points; with valve versus without valve 0.1 (- 11.1 to 11.3) points. Similar results were found for the NHPT: + 0.3 (- 0.7 to 1.4), - 0.4 (- 1.4 to 0.7), 0.7 (- 0.4 to 1.8) s respectively. Attention increases when performing BLS. Attention and dexterity are not inferior when wearing PPE, including FFP2 masks. PPE should be used on a low-threshold basis.