Early and complete vitrectomy versus tap and inject in acute post cataract surgery endophthalmitis presenting with hand motion vision; a quasi-experimental study

• Published in: BMC ophthalmology 2022-01, Vol.22 (1), p.16-16, Article 16
• Main Authors: Tabatabaei, Seyed Ali, Aminzade, Soran, Ahmadraji, Aliasghar, Soleimani, Mohammad, Sefidan, Bahram Bohrani, Kasaee, Abolfazl, Cheraqpour, Kasra
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acuity; Analysis; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Antibiotics; Cataract; Cataract - drug therapy; Cataract surgery; Cataracts; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic retinopathy; Diabetics; Endophthalmitis; Endophthalmitis - drug therapy; Endophthalmitis vitrectomy study; EVS; Eye Infections, Bacterial - diagnosis; Eye Infections, Bacterial - drug therapy; Eye surgery; Hospitals; Humans; Injection; Ophthalmology; Patients; Postoperative Complications - drug therapy; Prospective Studies; Quasi-experimental methods; Retrospective Studies; Statistical analysis; Surgeons; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Vision; Vitrectomy
• ISSN: 1471-2415; 1471-2415
• DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02247-8

Based on endophthalmitis vitrectomy study, intravitreal injection of antibiotics is preferred for initial management of cases of acute post cataract surgery endophthalmitis (APCE) with presenting vision of hand motions (HM). This study aimed to compare outcomes of early and complete vitrectomy (VIT) and vitreous tap and antibiotic injection (T&I) in cases of APCE presented with vision of HM. In this prospective study, cases of APCE with vision of HM between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled. According to the time of presentation, the patients were arranged into two groups (VIT vs. T&I). Demographic data, elapsed time to developing endophthalmitis, past medical history, microbiology results, complications, and final visual acuity were recorded and analyzed. Seventy-six eyes of 76 patients were enrolled. Fifty-three eyes underwent T&I and twenty-three were arranged into the VIT group. Past medical history of 34.2% of patients was significant for diabetes mellitus. There was a statistically significant lower logMAR in VIT group compared to T&I group (diff = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.24, P-value = 0.007). The comparison of the diabetic and non-diabetic patients in both groups showed that the visual outcome was better in non-diabetic cases compared to the diabetic subjects. There was no statistically significant difference between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups regarding the superiority of procedure. Based on our results, we could recommend that it's maybe better to do early and complete vitrectomy as the initial management of APCE with the vision of HM. Past medical history of diabetes mellitus is not a determining factor for choosing initial management between vitrectomy and antibiotic injection.