Loading…
The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review
Electronic consultations (eConsults) are an increasingly used form of telemedicine that allows a nonspecialist clinician to seek specialist advice remotely without direct patient-specialist communication. Surgical clinics may see benefits from such forms of communication but face challenges with the...
Saved in:
Published in: | JMIR perioperative medicine 2022-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e34661 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e34661 |
container_title | JMIR perioperative medicine |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Payne, Thomas Kevric, Jasmina Stelmach, Wanda To, Henry |
description | Electronic consultations (eConsults) are an increasingly used form of telemedicine that allows a nonspecialist clinician to seek specialist advice remotely without direct patient-specialist communication. Surgical clinics may see benefits from such forms of communication but face challenges with the need for intervention planning.
We aimed to use the Quadruple Aim Framework to integrate published knowledge of surgical outpatient eConsults with regard to efficacy, safety, limitations, and evolving use in the era of COVID-19.
We systematically searched for relevant studies across four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) on November 4, 2021, with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published in the past 10 years, and data on the outcomes of outpatient surgical eConsults.
A total of 363 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 33 (9.1%) were included. Most of the included studies were from the United States (23/33, 70%) and Canada (7/33, 21%), with a predominant multidisciplinary focus (9/33, 27%). Most were retrospective audits (16/33, 48%), with 15% (5/33) of the studies having a prospective component.
The surgical eConsult studies indicated a possible benefit for population health, promising safety results, enhanced patient and clinician experience, and cost savings compared with the traditional face-to-face surgical referral pathway. Their use appeared to be more favorable in some surgical subspecialties, and the overall efficacy was similar to that of medical subspecialties. Limited data on their long-term safety and use during the COVID-19 pandemic were identified, and this should be the focus of future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2196/34661 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_53c52ee4b2ac4312bad6b7e3f80a07fa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_53c52ee4b2ac4312bad6b7e3f80a07fa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2657516486</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkltrGzEQRkVpaULivxAEpdAXt7p7tw-FYtI2EBLI5VnMake2zHrlSrsO7q-vHKch6ZNG0uHwjTSETDj7LHhtvkhlDH9DjoU2fFpzUb19UR-RSc4rxpjQXApTvydHUitphJDHxN4tkd5npNHT8w7dkGIfHJ3HPo_dAEMoBQ09vR6HTdlhP9DbMS0w7ei8CwXNX-ntrh-WmMMfbOkVpFS4LdIb3AZ8OCXvPHQZJ0_rCbn_cX43_zW9vP55Mf9-OXWSiZITnHRKG6yF9MaDaRTzUrV1K6H2TOmW1zOpOPdOs5ZV0BjvBMjGsIajA3lCLg7eNsLKblJYQ9rZCME-HsS0sJCG4Dq0WjotEFUjwCnJRQOtaWYofcWAzfze9e3g2ozNGltXmk7QvZK-vunD0i7i1tZMCyZ1EXx6EqT4e8Q82HXIDrsOeoxjtsJooStV2IJ--A9dxTH15an21ExzoypTqI8HyqWYc0L_HIYzu58A-zgBhTt7mfyZ-vff8i9GpKs1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2657516486</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Payne, Thomas ; Kevric, Jasmina ; Stelmach, Wanda ; To, Henry</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Thomas ; Kevric, Jasmina ; Stelmach, Wanda ; To, Henry</creatorcontrib><description>Electronic consultations (eConsults) are an increasingly used form of telemedicine that allows a nonspecialist clinician to seek specialist advice remotely without direct patient-specialist communication. Surgical clinics may see benefits from such forms of communication but face challenges with the need for intervention planning.
We aimed to use the Quadruple Aim Framework to integrate published knowledge of surgical outpatient eConsults with regard to efficacy, safety, limitations, and evolving use in the era of COVID-19.
We systematically searched for relevant studies across four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) on November 4, 2021, with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published in the past 10 years, and data on the outcomes of outpatient surgical eConsults.
A total of 363 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 33 (9.1%) were included. Most of the included studies were from the United States (23/33, 70%) and Canada (7/33, 21%), with a predominant multidisciplinary focus (9/33, 27%). Most were retrospective audits (16/33, 48%), with 15% (5/33) of the studies having a prospective component.
The surgical eConsult studies indicated a possible benefit for population health, promising safety results, enhanced patient and clinician experience, and cost savings compared with the traditional face-to-face surgical referral pathway. Their use appeared to be more favorable in some surgical subspecialties, and the overall efficacy was similar to that of medical subspecialties. Limited data on their long-term safety and use during the COVID-19 pandemic were identified, and this should be the focus of future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2561-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2561-9128</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/34661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35436223</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Communication ; Gynecology ; Health services ; Investigations ; Medical referrals ; Multimedia ; Nurse practitioners ; Obstetrics ; Otolaryngology ; Patient satisfaction ; Perioperative care ; Primary care ; Review ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Surgery ; Telemedicine ; Urology</subject><ispartof>JMIR perioperative medicine, 2022-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e34661</ispartof><rights>Thomas Payne, Jasmina Kevric, Wanda Stelmach, Henry To. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 14.04.2022.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Thomas Payne, Jasmina Kevric, Wanda Stelmach, Henry To. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 14.04.2022. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7252-882X ; 0000-0002-3807-7324 ; 0000-0002-5530-3717 ; 0000-0001-5499-3499</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2657516486/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2657516486?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436223$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kevric, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelmach, Wanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>To, Henry</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review</title><title>JMIR perioperative medicine</title><addtitle>JMIR Perioper Med</addtitle><description>Electronic consultations (eConsults) are an increasingly used form of telemedicine that allows a nonspecialist clinician to seek specialist advice remotely without direct patient-specialist communication. Surgical clinics may see benefits from such forms of communication but face challenges with the need for intervention planning.
We aimed to use the Quadruple Aim Framework to integrate published knowledge of surgical outpatient eConsults with regard to efficacy, safety, limitations, and evolving use in the era of COVID-19.
We systematically searched for relevant studies across four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) on November 4, 2021, with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published in the past 10 years, and data on the outcomes of outpatient surgical eConsults.
A total of 363 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 33 (9.1%) were included. Most of the included studies were from the United States (23/33, 70%) and Canada (7/33, 21%), with a predominant multidisciplinary focus (9/33, 27%). Most were retrospective audits (16/33, 48%), with 15% (5/33) of the studies having a prospective component.
The surgical eConsult studies indicated a possible benefit for population health, promising safety results, enhanced patient and clinician experience, and cost savings compared with the traditional face-to-face surgical referral pathway. Their use appeared to be more favorable in some surgical subspecialties, and the overall efficacy was similar to that of medical subspecialties. Limited data on their long-term safety and use during the COVID-19 pandemic were identified, and this should be the focus of future research.</description><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Nurse practitioners</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Perioperative care</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2561-9128</issn><issn>2561-9128</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkltrGzEQRkVpaULivxAEpdAXt7p7tw-FYtI2EBLI5VnMake2zHrlSrsO7q-vHKch6ZNG0uHwjTSETDj7LHhtvkhlDH9DjoU2fFpzUb19UR-RSc4rxpjQXApTvydHUitphJDHxN4tkd5npNHT8w7dkGIfHJ3HPo_dAEMoBQ09vR6HTdlhP9DbMS0w7ei8CwXNX-ntrh-WmMMfbOkVpFS4LdIb3AZ8OCXvPHQZJ0_rCbn_cX43_zW9vP55Mf9-OXWSiZITnHRKG6yF9MaDaRTzUrV1K6H2TOmW1zOpOPdOs5ZV0BjvBMjGsIajA3lCLg7eNsLKblJYQ9rZCME-HsS0sJCG4Dq0WjotEFUjwCnJRQOtaWYofcWAzfze9e3g2ozNGltXmk7QvZK-vunD0i7i1tZMCyZ1EXx6EqT4e8Q82HXIDrsOeoxjtsJooStV2IJ--A9dxTH15an21ExzoypTqI8HyqWYc0L_HIYzu58A-zgBhTt7mfyZ-vff8i9GpKs1</recordid><startdate>20220414</startdate><enddate>20220414</enddate><creator>Payne, Thomas</creator><creator>Kevric, Jasmina</creator><creator>Stelmach, Wanda</creator><creator>To, Henry</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-882X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3807-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-3717</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-3499</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220414</creationdate><title>The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review</title><author>Payne, Thomas ; Kevric, Jasmina ; Stelmach, Wanda ; To, Henry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Nurse practitioners</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Perioperative care</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kevric, Jasmina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelmach, Wanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>To, Henry</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JMIR perioperative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Thomas</au><au>Kevric, Jasmina</au><au>Stelmach, Wanda</au><au>To, Henry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review</atitle><jtitle>JMIR perioperative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>JMIR Perioper Med</addtitle><date>2022-04-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e34661</spage><pages>e34661-</pages><issn>2561-9128</issn><eissn>2561-9128</eissn><abstract>Electronic consultations (eConsults) are an increasingly used form of telemedicine that allows a nonspecialist clinician to seek specialist advice remotely without direct patient-specialist communication. Surgical clinics may see benefits from such forms of communication but face challenges with the need for intervention planning.
We aimed to use the Quadruple Aim Framework to integrate published knowledge of surgical outpatient eConsults with regard to efficacy, safety, limitations, and evolving use in the era of COVID-19.
We systematically searched for relevant studies across four databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) on November 4, 2021, with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published in the past 10 years, and data on the outcomes of outpatient surgical eConsults.
A total of 363 studies were screened for eligibility, of which 33 (9.1%) were included. Most of the included studies were from the United States (23/33, 70%) and Canada (7/33, 21%), with a predominant multidisciplinary focus (9/33, 27%). Most were retrospective audits (16/33, 48%), with 15% (5/33) of the studies having a prospective component.
The surgical eConsult studies indicated a possible benefit for population health, promising safety results, enhanced patient and clinician experience, and cost savings compared with the traditional face-to-face surgical referral pathway. Their use appeared to be more favorable in some surgical subspecialties, and the overall efficacy was similar to that of medical subspecialties. Limited data on their long-term safety and use during the COVID-19 pandemic were identified, and this should be the focus of future research.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>35436223</pmid><doi>10.2196/34661</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-882X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3807-7324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-3717</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-3499</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2561-9128 |
ispartof | JMIR perioperative medicine, 2022-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e34661 |
issn | 2561-9128 2561-9128 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_53c52ee4b2ac4312bad6b7e3f80a07fa |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Communication Gynecology Health services Investigations Medical referrals Multimedia Nurse practitioners Obstetrics Otolaryngology Patient satisfaction Perioperative care Primary care Review Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Surgery Telemedicine Urology |
title | The Use of Electronic Consultations in Outpatient Surgery Clinics: Synthesized Narrative Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A40%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Electronic%20Consultations%20in%20Outpatient%20Surgery%20Clinics:%20Synthesized%20Narrative%20Review&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20perioperative%20medicine&rft.au=Payne,%20Thomas&rft.date=2022-04-14&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e34661&rft.pages=e34661-&rft.issn=2561-9128&rft.eissn=2561-9128&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/34661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2657516486%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-9ac3c456e923f6fa6b40f34d9d3a9f045d1973411fc50d08ab6fc2a3b60b1eca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2657516486&rft_id=info:pmid/35436223&rfr_iscdi=true |