Loading…
YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM
The aim of this study was to assess the yield and fruits quality of plum produced in ecological system.In 2019-2020 periods the influence of different fertilizers (Biohumus, Macys BC 28 and Cifamin BK) on yield and fruits quality at three plum cultivars (‘Centenar’, ‘Tita’ and ‘Stanley’) was carried...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Romanian Journal of Horticulture 2020-12, Vol.1 (1), p.67-74 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 74 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 67 |
| container_title | Romanian Journal of Horticulture |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Butac, Mădălina Chivu, Mihai |
| description | The aim of this study was to assess the yield and fruits quality of plum produced
in ecological system.In 2019-2020 periods the influence of different fertilizers
(Biohumus, Macys BC 28 and Cifamin BK) on yield and fruits quality at three plum
cultivars (‘Centenar’, ‘Tita’ and ‘Stanley’) was carried out in a demonstrative plot from
Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitești, Romania. Biohumus was applied to the
soil in increasing dosesfrom 0.5 l/tree (respectively 415 l/ha), 0.7 l/tree (respectively
585 l/ha) to 0.9 l / tree (respectively 750 l/ha) in two moments: in spring before the
start of vegetation and in autumn after the fall of the leaves.Macys BC 28 and Cifamin
BK fertilizers were applied foliar in doses of 2 l/ha, respectively 1 l/ha, in two
moments: after flowering and in the young fruit phase.As results of the investigations
we found that: the highest fruit yield was obtained at ‘Centenar’ (47.36 kg/tree) and
‘Stanley’ (41.00 kg/tree) cultivars in fertilization variant 3 (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil
application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha, foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar
application);the best results regarding the fruits weight were also obtained in the 3rd
fertilization variant (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha,
foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar application), among the varieties being
noted the ‘Tita’cv. with an average fruit weight of 59. 14 g; the fruits soluble solid
content was higher in the case of the fertilized variants than in the unfertilized
variant and the fruits aciditywas higher in the case of the unfertilized variant than in
the fertilized variants. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.51258/RJH.2020.09 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5427253d668c4b8ab5f1ca519a2fd7b3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5427253d668c4b8ab5f1ca519a2fd7b3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2692672516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-2a42114fe07e5a25c2d5d88b6b7ec7020d1876477c8241b4f8b00da6ca608273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wNs4tXi7nT_9VihSE2hSlsTTpvttjUQtLqFg9_eCsTTTCZvfvPmIXRLyZhT4Oph9TwfAwEyJsEFGoD0maeI8i_PvRRcXKNR120JISADRikdoMd1HCVTHC6neLYq4hy_FmES52ucznCWLiL8khQLPCmSPH4LV1m8xNEkTdKneBImOFtnebS4QVeN2XX16FyHKJ9F-WTunWWepSIIPDAMKGVNTWTNDXALFa-UKkUpayt73xVVUjAprQJGS9aokpDKCGsEUf0HQxSfsFVrtvrLbT6M-9Gt2ejjoHXv2rj9xu5qzRlI4H4lhLKsVKbkDbWG08BAU8nS71l3J9aXa78PdbfX2_bgPnv3GkQAot-molfdn1TWtV3n6ub_KiX6mLnuM9d_mWsS-L81HmsN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692672516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Butac, Mădălina ; Chivu, Mihai</creator><creatorcontrib>Butac, Mădălina ; Chivu, Mihai</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the yield and fruits quality of plum produced
in ecological system.In 2019-2020 periods the influence of different fertilizers
(Biohumus, Macys BC 28 and Cifamin BK) on yield and fruits quality at three plum
cultivars (‘Centenar’, ‘Tita’ and ‘Stanley’) was carried out in a demonstrative plot from
Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitești, Romania. Biohumus was applied to the
soil in increasing dosesfrom 0.5 l/tree (respectively 415 l/ha), 0.7 l/tree (respectively
585 l/ha) to 0.9 l / tree (respectively 750 l/ha) in two moments: in spring before the
start of vegetation and in autumn after the fall of the leaves.Macys BC 28 and Cifamin
BK fertilizers were applied foliar in doses of 2 l/ha, respectively 1 l/ha, in two
moments: after flowering and in the young fruit phase.As results of the investigations
we found that: the highest fruit yield was obtained at ‘Centenar’ (47.36 kg/tree) and
‘Stanley’ (41.00 kg/tree) cultivars in fertilization variant 3 (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil
application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha, foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar
application);the best results regarding the fruits weight were also obtained in the 3rd
fertilization variant (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha,
foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar application), among the varieties being
noted the ‘Tita’cv. with an average fruit weight of 59. 14 g; the fruits soluble solid
content was higher in the case of the fertilized variants than in the unfertilized
variant and the fruits aciditywas higher in the case of the unfertilized variant than in
the fertilized variants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2734-7656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2734-8083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.51258/RJH.2020.09</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Horticulture Section of Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences – “Gheorghe Ionescu-Şişeşti”</publisher><subject>Crop yield ; cultivar ; Cultivars ; Ecological effects ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Flowering ; Fruits ; fruits quality ; plum ; Soils ; Trees ; Weight ; yield</subject><ispartof>Romanian Journal of Horticulture, 2020-12, Vol.1 (1), p.67-74</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692672516?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butac, Mădălina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivu, Mihai</creatorcontrib><title>YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM</title><title>Romanian Journal of Horticulture</title><description>The aim of this study was to assess the yield and fruits quality of plum produced
in ecological system.In 2019-2020 periods the influence of different fertilizers
(Biohumus, Macys BC 28 and Cifamin BK) on yield and fruits quality at three plum
cultivars (‘Centenar’, ‘Tita’ and ‘Stanley’) was carried out in a demonstrative plot from
Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitești, Romania. Biohumus was applied to the
soil in increasing dosesfrom 0.5 l/tree (respectively 415 l/ha), 0.7 l/tree (respectively
585 l/ha) to 0.9 l / tree (respectively 750 l/ha) in two moments: in spring before the
start of vegetation and in autumn after the fall of the leaves.Macys BC 28 and Cifamin
BK fertilizers were applied foliar in doses of 2 l/ha, respectively 1 l/ha, in two
moments: after flowering and in the young fruit phase.As results of the investigations
we found that: the highest fruit yield was obtained at ‘Centenar’ (47.36 kg/tree) and
‘Stanley’ (41.00 kg/tree) cultivars in fertilization variant 3 (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil
application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha, foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar
application);the best results regarding the fruits weight were also obtained in the 3rd
fertilization variant (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha,
foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar application), among the varieties being
noted the ‘Tita’cv. with an average fruit weight of 59. 14 g; the fruits soluble solid
content was higher in the case of the fertilized variants than in the unfertilized
variant and the fruits aciditywas higher in the case of the unfertilized variant than in
the fertilized variants.</description><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>cultivar</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>fruits quality</subject><subject>plum</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>yield</subject><issn>2734-7656</issn><issn>2734-8083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wNs4tXi7nT_9VihSE2hSlsTTpvttjUQtLqFg9_eCsTTTCZvfvPmIXRLyZhT4Oph9TwfAwEyJsEFGoD0maeI8i_PvRRcXKNR120JISADRikdoMd1HCVTHC6neLYq4hy_FmES52ucznCWLiL8khQLPCmSPH4LV1m8xNEkTdKneBImOFtnebS4QVeN2XX16FyHKJ9F-WTunWWepSIIPDAMKGVNTWTNDXALFa-UKkUpayt73xVVUjAprQJGS9aokpDKCGsEUf0HQxSfsFVrtvrLbT6M-9Gt2ejjoHXv2rj9xu5qzRlI4H4lhLKsVKbkDbWG08BAU8nS71l3J9aXa78PdbfX2_bgPnv3GkQAot-molfdn1TWtV3n6ub_KiX6mLnuM9d_mWsS-L81HmsN</recordid><startdate>20201212</startdate><enddate>20201212</enddate><creator>Butac, Mădălina</creator><creator>Chivu, Mihai</creator><general>Horticulture Section of Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences – “Gheorghe Ionescu-Şişeşti”</general><general>Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201212</creationdate><title>YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM</title><author>Butac, Mădălina ; Chivu, Mihai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-2a42114fe07e5a25c2d5d88b6b7ec7020d1876477c8241b4f8b00da6ca608273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>cultivar</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>fruits quality</topic><topic>plum</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butac, Mădălina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivu, Mihai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Romanian Journal of Horticulture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butac, Mădălina</au><au>Chivu, Mihai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM</atitle><jtitle>Romanian Journal of Horticulture</jtitle><date>2020-12-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>67-74</pages><issn>2734-7656</issn><eissn>2734-8083</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the yield and fruits quality of plum produced
in ecological system.In 2019-2020 periods the influence of different fertilizers
(Biohumus, Macys BC 28 and Cifamin BK) on yield and fruits quality at three plum
cultivars (‘Centenar’, ‘Tita’ and ‘Stanley’) was carried out in a demonstrative plot from
Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitești, Romania. Biohumus was applied to the
soil in increasing dosesfrom 0.5 l/tree (respectively 415 l/ha), 0.7 l/tree (respectively
585 l/ha) to 0.9 l / tree (respectively 750 l/ha) in two moments: in spring before the
start of vegetation and in autumn after the fall of the leaves.Macys BC 28 and Cifamin
BK fertilizers were applied foliar in doses of 2 l/ha, respectively 1 l/ha, in two
moments: after flowering and in the young fruit phase.As results of the investigations
we found that: the highest fruit yield was obtained at ‘Centenar’ (47.36 kg/tree) and
‘Stanley’ (41.00 kg/tree) cultivars in fertilization variant 3 (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil
application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha, foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar
application);the best results regarding the fruits weight were also obtained in the 3rd
fertilization variant (Biohumus – 0,9 l/tree, soil application + Macys BC 28 – 2 l/ha,
foliar application + Cifamin BK – 1 l/ha, foliar application), among the varieties being
noted the ‘Tita’cv. with an average fruit weight of 59. 14 g; the fruits soluble solid
content was higher in the case of the fertilized variants than in the unfertilized
variant and the fruits aciditywas higher in the case of the unfertilized variant than in
the fertilized variants.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Horticulture Section of Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences – “Gheorghe Ionescu-Şişeşti”</pub><doi>10.51258/RJH.2020.09</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2734-7656 |
| ispartof | Romanian Journal of Horticulture, 2020-12, Vol.1 (1), p.67-74 |
| issn | 2734-7656 2734-8083 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5427253d668c4b8ab5f1ca519a2fd7b3 |
| source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
| subjects | Crop yield cultivar Cultivars Ecological effects Fertilization Fertilizers Flowering Fruits fruits quality plum Soils Trees Weight yield |
| title | YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF SOME PLUM CULTIVARSIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A31%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=YIELD%20AND%20FRUIT%20QUALITY%20OF%20SOME%20PLUM%20CULTIVARSIN%20ECOLOGICAL%20SYSTEM&rft.jtitle=Romanian%20Journal%20of%20Horticulture&rft.au=Butac,%20M%C4%83d%C4%83lina&rft.date=2020-12-12&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=67-74&rft.issn=2734-7656&rft.eissn=2734-8083&rft_id=info:doi/10.51258/RJH.2020.09&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2692672516%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1699-2a42114fe07e5a25c2d5d88b6b7ec7020d1876477c8241b4f8b00da6ca608273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692672516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |