Loading…

Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling

The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SN applied sciences 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303
Main Author: Dosoky, Wael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43
container_end_page 13
container_issue 11
container_start_page 303
container_title SN applied sciences
container_volume 5
creator Dosoky, Wael
description The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies. Article highlights • Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made. • The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets. • The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2884013055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQh1HUSo02eYGekHJ2iwHb-BhF_RMpUi_pGWEYNqxss53BTfcd-tD1xlV664mBmd_HSB9j72vxoRai-0ha6kZWQqpKNI3qq-cLdimb9ar6rn7zWrfqHbsmOgghZNcrbdQl-31LBEQTzIXnyMsTAvAp_YLAHaI7EQ-uOILCY0ZOy0ALRueBe_czlQRrHwr4kvLMF0rzniNQopLW7omXPOU9uuPTiTviaY6AuJIj5onPywSYvBv5lAOM45q9Ym-jGwmu_5479v3zp8e7r9XDty_3d7cPlVdGlKr1nRlUK12IIjQtBCOUiq4F39RSgumG1qg29L2ue62ErIUObQzgPYhgBq127H7jhuwO9ohpcniy2SX78pBxbx2W5EewjQ5KKxND53ptRBhcN8gYBhHbRvvmzLrZWEfMPxagYg95wXld30pjtKjV2cmOyW3KYyZCiK-_1sKeJdpNol0l2heJ9nkNqS1E6_C8B_yH_k_qD2u3o3Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884013055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Dosoky, Wael</creator><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><description>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies. Article highlights • Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made. • The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets. • The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2523-3963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2523-3971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied and Technical Physics ; Arrays ; Cavities ; Cavity detection ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Datasets ; Dipoles ; Earth Sciences ; Electrical resistivity ; Electrodes ; Engineering ; Environment ; Geology ; Holes ; Individual arrays ; Materials Science ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Mixed arrays ; Numerical modelling ; Numerical models ; Parameters ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Simulation ; Software ; Tomography ; Two dimensional models</subject><ispartof>SN applied sciences, 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2884013055/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2884013055?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><title>SN applied sciences</title><addtitle>SN Appl. Sci</addtitle><description>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies. Article highlights • Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made. • The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets. • The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</description><subject>Applied and Technical Physics</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cavity detection</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dipoles</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Holes</subject><subject>Individual arrays</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mixed arrays</subject><subject>Numerical modelling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><issn>2523-3963</issn><issn>2523-3971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQh1HUSo02eYGekHJ2iwHb-BhF_RMpUi_pGWEYNqxss53BTfcd-tD1xlV664mBmd_HSB9j72vxoRai-0ha6kZWQqpKNI3qq-cLdimb9ar6rn7zWrfqHbsmOgghZNcrbdQl-31LBEQTzIXnyMsTAvAp_YLAHaI7EQ-uOILCY0ZOy0ALRueBe_czlQRrHwr4kvLMF0rzniNQopLW7omXPOU9uuPTiTviaY6AuJIj5onPywSYvBv5lAOM45q9Ym-jGwmu_5479v3zp8e7r9XDty_3d7cPlVdGlKr1nRlUK12IIjQtBCOUiq4F39RSgumG1qg29L2ue62ErIUObQzgPYhgBq127H7jhuwO9ohpcniy2SX78pBxbx2W5EewjQ5KKxND53ptRBhcN8gYBhHbRvvmzLrZWEfMPxagYg95wXld30pjtKjV2cmOyW3KYyZCiK-_1sKeJdpNol0l2heJ9nkNqS1E6_C8B_yH_k_qD2u3o3Y</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Dosoky, Wael</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><author>Dosoky, Wael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Applied and Technical Physics</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cavity detection</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dipoles</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Holes</topic><topic>Individual arrays</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mixed arrays</topic><topic>Numerical modelling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SN applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dosoky, Wael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</atitle><jtitle>SN applied sciences</jtitle><stitle>SN Appl. Sci</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>303-13</pages><artnum>303</artnum><issn>2523-3963</issn><eissn>2523-3971</eissn><abstract>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies. Article highlights • Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made. • The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets. • The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2523-3963
ispartof SN applied sciences, 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303
issn 2523-3963
2523-3971
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54
source Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Applied and Technical Physics
Arrays
Cavities
Cavity detection
Chemistry/Food Science
Datasets
Dipoles
Earth Sciences
Electrical resistivity
Electrodes
Engineering
Environment
Geology
Holes
Individual arrays
Materials Science
Mathematical models
Methods
Mixed arrays
Numerical modelling
Numerical models
Parameters
Robustness (mathematics)
Simulation
Software
Tomography
Two dimensional models
title Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A52%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20three%20mixed%20arrays%20dataset%20for%20subsurface%20cavities%20detection%20using%20resistivity%20tomography%20as%20inferred%20from%20numerical%20modelling&rft.jtitle=SN%20applied%20sciences&rft.au=Dosoky,%20Wael&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=303-13&rft.artnum=303&rft.issn=2523-3963&rft.eissn=2523-3971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2884013055%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884013055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true