Loading…
Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling
The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | SN applied sciences 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43 |
container_end_page | 13 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | SN applied sciences |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Dosoky, Wael |
description | The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.
Article highlights
• Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made.
• The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets.
• The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2884013055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQh1HUSo02eYGekHJ2iwHb-BhF_RMpUi_pGWEYNqxss53BTfcd-tD1xlV664mBmd_HSB9j72vxoRai-0ha6kZWQqpKNI3qq-cLdimb9ar6rn7zWrfqHbsmOgghZNcrbdQl-31LBEQTzIXnyMsTAvAp_YLAHaI7EQ-uOILCY0ZOy0ALRueBe_czlQRrHwr4kvLMF0rzniNQopLW7omXPOU9uuPTiTviaY6AuJIj5onPywSYvBv5lAOM45q9Ym-jGwmu_5479v3zp8e7r9XDty_3d7cPlVdGlKr1nRlUK12IIjQtBCOUiq4F39RSgumG1qg29L2ue62ErIUObQzgPYhgBq127H7jhuwO9ohpcniy2SX78pBxbx2W5EewjQ5KKxND53ptRBhcN8gYBhHbRvvmzLrZWEfMPxagYg95wXld30pjtKjV2cmOyW3KYyZCiK-_1sKeJdpNol0l2heJ9nkNqS1E6_C8B_yH_k_qD2u3o3Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884013055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Dosoky, Wael</creator><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><description>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.
Article highlights
• Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made.
• The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets.
• The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2523-3963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2523-3971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied and Technical Physics ; Arrays ; Cavities ; Cavity detection ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Datasets ; Dipoles ; Earth Sciences ; Electrical resistivity ; Electrodes ; Engineering ; Environment ; Geology ; Holes ; Individual arrays ; Materials Science ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Mixed arrays ; Numerical modelling ; Numerical models ; Parameters ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Simulation ; Software ; Tomography ; Two dimensional models</subject><ispartof>SN applied sciences, 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2884013055/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2884013055?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><title>SN applied sciences</title><addtitle>SN Appl. Sci</addtitle><description>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.
Article highlights
• Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made.
• The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets.
• The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</description><subject>Applied and Technical Physics</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Cavities</subject><subject>Cavity detection</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Dipoles</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Holes</subject><subject>Individual arrays</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mixed arrays</subject><subject>Numerical modelling</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><issn>2523-3963</issn><issn>2523-3971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u3CAQh1HUSo02eYGekHJ2iwHb-BhF_RMpUi_pGWEYNqxss53BTfcd-tD1xlV664mBmd_HSB9j72vxoRai-0ha6kZWQqpKNI3qq-cLdimb9ar6rn7zWrfqHbsmOgghZNcrbdQl-31LBEQTzIXnyMsTAvAp_YLAHaI7EQ-uOILCY0ZOy0ALRueBe_czlQRrHwr4kvLMF0rzniNQopLW7omXPOU9uuPTiTviaY6AuJIj5onPywSYvBv5lAOM45q9Ym-jGwmu_5479v3zp8e7r9XDty_3d7cPlVdGlKr1nRlUK12IIjQtBCOUiq4F39RSgumG1qg29L2ue62ErIUObQzgPYhgBq127H7jhuwO9ohpcniy2SX78pBxbx2W5EewjQ5KKxND53ptRBhcN8gYBhHbRvvmzLrZWEfMPxagYg95wXld30pjtKjV2cmOyW3KYyZCiK-_1sKeJdpNol0l2heJ9nkNqS1E6_C8B_yH_k_qD2u3o3Y</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Dosoky, Wael</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</title><author>Dosoky, Wael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Applied and Technical Physics</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Cavities</topic><topic>Cavity detection</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Dipoles</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Holes</topic><topic>Individual arrays</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mixed arrays</topic><topic>Numerical modelling</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dosoky, Wael</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SN applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dosoky, Wael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling</atitle><jtitle>SN applied sciences</jtitle><stitle>SN Appl. Sci</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>303-13</pages><artnum>303</artnum><issn>2523-3963</issn><eissn>2523-3971</eissn><abstract>The present study deals with the evaluation of a three-mixed array dataset for the detection of subsurface cavities using conceptual air-filled cavity model sets at different depths. Cavity models were simulated using the forward modelling technique to generate synthetic apparent resistivity data for three common individual arrays. These arrays are dipole–dipole (DD), pole–dipole (PD), and Wenner–Schlumberger (WS). The synthetically apparent resistivity data obtained from two different individual arrays were merged to form a high-resolution single model. Consequently, three possible mixed arrays datasets can be obtained: the dipole–dipole-Wenner–Schlumberger (DD+WS), pole–dipole, and Wenner–Schlumberger (PD+WS), and dipole–dipole and pole–dipole (DD+PD). The synthetically apparent resistivity data for both the individual and mixed arrays were inverted using Res2dinv software based on the robust constrain inversion technique to obtain a 2D resistivity model section. The inverted resistivity sections were evaluated in terms of their recovering ability of the model’s parameters (e.g. resistivity, and geometry). The results show that the individual arrays can resolve the location and dimensions of the cavity within reasonable accuracy only at a depth not exceeding 6 m below the surface. On the other hand, a significant resolution enhancement in model resistivity with increasing depth was observed when the mixed arrays were used. The (DD+WS) mixed arrays dataset brings up better model resistivity and shows closer parameters to the true actual model among the other mixed arrays. So it is strongly recommended for cavity detection studies.
Article highlights
• Comparison between three traditional arrays and mixed array datasets in delineation of the geometry of subsurface cavities using numerical simulation was made.
• The resolution of the obtained resistivity model can be enhanced by using mixed array datasets.
• The numerical simulations are considered an effective tool for predicting several scenarios for studying the electrical response of any subsurface structures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2523-3963 |
ispartof | SN applied sciences, 2023-11, Vol.5 (11), p.303-13, Article 303 |
issn | 2523-3963 2523-3971 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54d3438fd7a9480dba7b2fdb0f654c54 |
source | Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Applied and Technical Physics Arrays Cavities Cavity detection Chemistry/Food Science Datasets Dipoles Earth Sciences Electrical resistivity Electrodes Engineering Environment Geology Holes Individual arrays Materials Science Mathematical models Methods Mixed arrays Numerical modelling Numerical models Parameters Robustness (mathematics) Simulation Software Tomography Two dimensional models |
title | Assessment of three mixed arrays dataset for subsurface cavities detection using resistivity tomography as inferred from numerical modelling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A52%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20three%20mixed%20arrays%20dataset%20for%20subsurface%20cavities%20detection%20using%20resistivity%20tomography%20as%20inferred%20from%20numerical%20modelling&rft.jtitle=SN%20applied%20sciences&rft.au=Dosoky,%20Wael&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=303-13&rft.artnum=303&rft.issn=2523-3963&rft.eissn=2523-3971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42452-023-05539-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2884013055%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6c78b362adf0d56ed8033fa6ec5122e87b6836d994194302104d6fdecce0d8b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884013055&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |