Loading…
A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One
Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have establis...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microbiology research 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023 |
container_end_page | 1088 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1077 |
container_title | Microbiology research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Trovato, Laura Calvo, Maddalena Scalia, Guido Oliveri, Salvatore |
description | Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/microbiolres14030072 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2869438618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1rHDEMHUILCWn-QQ6GnCf113z4uCxpu5CQwraFnoxsazZeZsdT2xPYW356nWwpPVQXCenp6UmqqmtGb4VQ9OPB2xiMD2PExCQVlHb8rLrgVLR1J3v27p_4vLpKaU-LiY51vbqoXlZkHQ4zRMj-GcnXGNKM9i3e5sUdiZ_I3TOMS6lPO7KGyXkHJM3zLdlM5IfPMZDtkizO2Rs_-nwk-SmGZfdEHl6VTbDkevVASiPZ4pR8Li1IfiKkXD9O-KF6P8CY8OqPv6y-f7r7tv5S3z9-3qxX97UViuUaml6allPDpXMIhqFCK61l1LUOoHNctsKW3Zk01jada7hp0ChmLEhOubisNideF2Cv5-gPEI86gNdviRB3GmL2dkTdyIFZ5Xo1cC5BUWNFzxT2g2KDbQQWrpsT1xzDrwVT1vuwxKnI17xvlRR9y_qCkidUuUJKEYe_UxnVr6_T_3ud-A07a5G_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869438618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</creator><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2036-7481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2036-7481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/microbiolres14030072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Perugia: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antifungal agents ; antifungal susceptibility ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial resistance ; broth microdilution ; Candida ; Candida spp ; Clinical trials ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug resistance ; Experimental methods ; Fungicides ; Methods ; Micronaut-AM ; Pathogens ; Phenotypes ; Software ; Susceptibility ; Workflow ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>Microbiology research, 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0256-956X ; 0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869438618/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869438618?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalia, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><title>Microbiology research</title><description>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</description><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>antifungal susceptibility</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>broth microdilution</subject><subject>Candida</subject><subject>Candida spp</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Micronaut-AM</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Susceptibility</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>2036-7481</issn><issn>2036-7481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1rHDEMHUILCWn-QQ6GnCf113z4uCxpu5CQwraFnoxsazZeZsdT2xPYW356nWwpPVQXCenp6UmqqmtGb4VQ9OPB2xiMD2PExCQVlHb8rLrgVLR1J3v27p_4vLpKaU-LiY51vbqoXlZkHQ4zRMj-GcnXGNKM9i3e5sUdiZ_I3TOMS6lPO7KGyXkHJM3zLdlM5IfPMZDtkizO2Rs_-nwk-SmGZfdEHl6VTbDkevVASiPZ4pR8Li1IfiKkXD9O-KF6P8CY8OqPv6y-f7r7tv5S3z9-3qxX97UViuUaml6allPDpXMIhqFCK61l1LUOoHNctsKW3Zk01jada7hp0ChmLEhOubisNideF2Cv5-gPEI86gNdviRB3GmL2dkTdyIFZ5Xo1cC5BUWNFzxT2g2KDbQQWrpsT1xzDrwVT1vuwxKnI17xvlRR9y_qCkidUuUJKEYe_UxnVr6_T_3ud-A07a5G_</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Trovato, Laura</creator><creator>Calvo, Maddalena</creator><creator>Scalia, Guido</creator><creator>Oliveri, Salvatore</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-956X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><author>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>antifungal susceptibility</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>broth microdilution</topic><topic>Candida</topic><topic>Candida spp</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Micronaut-AM</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Susceptibility</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalia, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microbiology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trovato, Laura</au><au>Calvo, Maddalena</au><au>Scalia, Guido</au><au>Oliveri, Salvatore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology research</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1077-1088</pages><issn>2036-7481</issn><eissn>2036-7481</eissn><abstract>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</abstract><cop>Perugia</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/microbiolres14030072</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-956X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2036-7481 |
ispartof | Microbiology research, 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088 |
issn | 2036-7481 2036-7481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Antifungal agents antifungal susceptibility Antimicrobial agents Antimicrobial resistance broth microdilution Candida Candida spp Clinical trials Diagnostic systems Drug resistance Experimental methods Fungicides Methods Micronaut-AM Pathogens Phenotypes Software Susceptibility Workflow Yeast Yeasts |
title | A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Prospective%20Study%20in%20Evaluating%20Candida%20spp.%20In%20Vitro%20Susceptibility%20through%20Micronaut-AM%20and%20Sensititre%20Yeast-One&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20research&rft.au=Trovato,%20Laura&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1077-1088&rft.issn=2036-7481&rft.eissn=2036-7481&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/microbiolres14030072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2869438618%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869438618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |