Loading…

A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One

Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have establis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microbiology research 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088
Main Authors: Trovato, Laura, Calvo, Maddalena, Scalia, Guido, Oliveri, Salvatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023
container_end_page 1088
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1077
container_title Microbiology research
container_volume 14
creator Trovato, Laura
Calvo, Maddalena
Scalia, Guido
Oliveri, Salvatore
description Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/microbiolres14030072
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2869438618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1rHDEMHUILCWn-QQ6GnCf113z4uCxpu5CQwraFnoxsazZeZsdT2xPYW356nWwpPVQXCenp6UmqqmtGb4VQ9OPB2xiMD2PExCQVlHb8rLrgVLR1J3v27p_4vLpKaU-LiY51vbqoXlZkHQ4zRMj-GcnXGNKM9i3e5sUdiZ_I3TOMS6lPO7KGyXkHJM3zLdlM5IfPMZDtkizO2Rs_-nwk-SmGZfdEHl6VTbDkevVASiPZ4pR8Li1IfiKkXD9O-KF6P8CY8OqPv6y-f7r7tv5S3z9-3qxX97UViuUaml6allPDpXMIhqFCK61l1LUOoHNctsKW3Zk01jada7hp0ChmLEhOubisNideF2Cv5-gPEI86gNdviRB3GmL2dkTdyIFZ5Xo1cC5BUWNFzxT2g2KDbQQWrpsT1xzDrwVT1vuwxKnI17xvlRR9y_qCkidUuUJKEYe_UxnVr6_T_3ud-A07a5G_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869438618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</creator><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2036-7481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2036-7481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/microbiolres14030072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Perugia: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antifungal agents ; antifungal susceptibility ; Antimicrobial agents ; Antimicrobial resistance ; broth microdilution ; Candida ; Candida spp ; Clinical trials ; Diagnostic systems ; Drug resistance ; Experimental methods ; Fungicides ; Methods ; Micronaut-AM ; Pathogens ; Phenotypes ; Software ; Susceptibility ; Workflow ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>Microbiology research, 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0256-956X ; 0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869438618/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869438618?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalia, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><title>Microbiology research</title><description>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</description><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>antifungal susceptibility</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>broth microdilution</subject><subject>Candida</subject><subject>Candida spp</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Micronaut-AM</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Susceptibility</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>2036-7481</issn><issn>2036-7481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1rHDEMHUILCWn-QQ6GnCf113z4uCxpu5CQwraFnoxsazZeZsdT2xPYW356nWwpPVQXCenp6UmqqmtGb4VQ9OPB2xiMD2PExCQVlHb8rLrgVLR1J3v27p_4vLpKaU-LiY51vbqoXlZkHQ4zRMj-GcnXGNKM9i3e5sUdiZ_I3TOMS6lPO7KGyXkHJM3zLdlM5IfPMZDtkizO2Rs_-nwk-SmGZfdEHl6VTbDkevVASiPZ4pR8Li1IfiKkXD9O-KF6P8CY8OqPv6y-f7r7tv5S3z9-3qxX97UViuUaml6allPDpXMIhqFCK61l1LUOoHNctsKW3Zk01jada7hp0ChmLEhOubisNideF2Cv5-gPEI86gNdviRB3GmL2dkTdyIFZ5Xo1cC5BUWNFzxT2g2KDbQQWrpsT1xzDrwVT1vuwxKnI17xvlRR9y_qCkidUuUJKEYe_UxnVr6_T_3ud-A07a5G_</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Trovato, Laura</creator><creator>Calvo, Maddalena</creator><creator>Scalia, Guido</creator><creator>Oliveri, Salvatore</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-956X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</title><author>Trovato, Laura ; Calvo, Maddalena ; Scalia, Guido ; Oliveri, Salvatore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>antifungal susceptibility</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>broth microdilution</topic><topic>Candida</topic><topic>Candida spp</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Micronaut-AM</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Susceptibility</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trovato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalia, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveri, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microbiology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trovato, Laura</au><au>Calvo, Maddalena</au><au>Scalia, Guido</au><au>Oliveri, Salvatore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology research</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1088</epage><pages>1077-1088</pages><issn>2036-7481</issn><eissn>2036-7481</eissn><abstract>Background. Among invasive fungal infection pathogens, Candida spp. represent the most common aetiological agents. The increasing rate of severe infections and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance highlight the importance of in vitro susceptibility testing. The EUCAST and the CLSI have established reference microdilutions that are reliable but difficult to apply in a laboratory routine. Commercial microdilutions could represent a valuable alternative within a diagnostic workflow. Methods. A number of 50 Candida spp. collected from positive blood samples simultaneously underwent the Sensititre Yeast-One microdilution as a standard susceptibility test and the Micronaut-AM as an experimental method. A comparison between the two techniques was produced, evaluating the effectiveness of the Micronaut-AM compared to the extensively consolidated Sensititre Yeast-One. Results. The two techniques revealed optimal agreement rates, confirming the reliability of the commercial microdilution kits within the diagnostic workflows. The results showed remarkable concordance for both susceptible and resistant isolates, highlighting slight variations in the different identified Candida species. Conclusions. Future studies about antifungal susceptibility testing should be encouraged, including molecular confirmation of possible resistance phenotypes and extended isolate numbers for the different Candida species. Moreover, it would be interesting to plan clinical trials after the execution of the examined commercial microdilution methods.</abstract><cop>Perugia</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/microbiolres14030072</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-956X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-8545</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2036-7481
ispartof Microbiology research, 2023-09, Vol.14 (3), p.1077-1088
issn 2036-7481
2036-7481
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_54f1c9d89f224a90bc3819e8f91fc53e
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Antifungal agents
antifungal susceptibility
Antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial resistance
broth microdilution
Candida
Candida spp
Clinical trials
Diagnostic systems
Drug resistance
Experimental methods
Fungicides
Methods
Micronaut-AM
Pathogens
Phenotypes
Software
Susceptibility
Workflow
Yeast
Yeasts
title A Comparative Prospective Study in Evaluating Candida spp. In Vitro Susceptibility through Micronaut-AM and Sensititre Yeast-One
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A19%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Prospective%20Study%20in%20Evaluating%20Candida%20spp.%20In%20Vitro%20Susceptibility%20through%20Micronaut-AM%20and%20Sensititre%20Yeast-One&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20research&rft.au=Trovato,%20Laura&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1088&rft.pages=1077-1088&rft.issn=2036-7481&rft.eissn=2036-7481&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/microbiolres14030072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2869438618%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-a584b620b24ddeab1e9ec4cc10d6daa7d2463c00714bcc57d52b5eb91bca42023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869438618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true