Loading…
A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction
Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologies rather than on user factors. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the current statu...
Saved in:
Published in: | SAGE open 2024-10, Vol.14 (4) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d8f967334a296553ae8b47d2f85dcb77355a561359a67d44e57fc4db037427c83 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | SAGE open |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Yang, Hyungmo Kim, Mi Jeong |
description | Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologies rather than on user factors. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the current status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. For our critical review, we developed an evaluation framework based on our definition of human–building interaction. Our results identified there are limitations in smart residential environments research: a lack of consideration of human-building interaction in the field of the built environment, an excessive focus on the user–technology interaction for performance, and less consideration of urban and architectural design issues regarding human–building interaction. To bridge the gap in the research, the three key points are discussed. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for designing and delivering improved smart residential environments, emphasizing the role of stakeholders in each smart residential environment lifecycle stage to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.
Plain language summary
A critical review of smart residential environment
Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologie. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. Our results identified limitations in smart residential environments research. The three key points are discussed to bridge the research gap. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for delivering improved smart residential environments to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/21582440241289814 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_55002a63c33b4b2297ad566974b1348c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21582440241289814</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_55002a63c33b4b2297ad566974b1348c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3149772738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d8f967334a296553ae8b47d2f85dcb77355a561359a67d44e57fc4db037427c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQxxdRsNQ-gLcFz6353GSPtbS2UBD8OIdskq0p201NdivefAff0Ccx64oKYi7J_Gb-_8kwSXIOwQRCxi4RpBwRAhCBiOcckqNk0LFxB49_vU-TUQhbEA8FlBA0SOQ0nXnbWCWr9NYcrHlOXZne7aRvYhysNnVjY25eH6x39S6GHTfSq8d04VQbbL1Jl-1O1u-vb1etrXQHVnVjvFSNdfVZclLKKpjR1z1MHhbz-9lyvL65Xs2m67HCADdjzcs8YxgTifKMUiwNLwjTqORUq4IxTKmkGcQ0lxnThBjKSkV0ATAjiCmOh8mq99VObsXe2zjDi3DSik_g_EbEoayqjKAUACQzrDAuSIFQzqSmWZYzUkBMuIpeF73X3run1oRGbF3r6_h9gSHJGUMMdx1hX6W8C8Gb8rsrBKJbjPizmKiZ9JogN-bH9X_BB2NyjAc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149772738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Yang, Hyungmo ; Kim, Mi Jeong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hyungmo ; Kim, Mi Jeong</creatorcontrib><description>Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologies rather than on user factors. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the current status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. For our critical review, we developed an evaluation framework based on our definition of human–building interaction. Our results identified there are limitations in smart residential environments research: a lack of consideration of human-building interaction in the field of the built environment, an excessive focus on the user–technology interaction for performance, and less consideration of urban and architectural design issues regarding human–building interaction. To bridge the gap in the research, the three key points are discussed. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for designing and delivering improved smart residential environments, emphasizing the role of stakeholders in each smart residential environment lifecycle stage to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.
Plain language summary
A critical review of smart residential environment
Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologie. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. Our results identified limitations in smart residential environments research. The three key points are discussed to bridge the research gap. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for delivering improved smart residential environments to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-2440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-2440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21582440241289814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Built environment</subject><ispartof>SAGE open, 2024-10, Vol.14 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d8f967334a296553ae8b47d2f85dcb77355a561359a67d44e57fc4db037427c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8292-5231 ; 0000-0002-0727-2741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440241289814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149772738?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21394,21966,25753,27853,27922,27924,27925,33611,37012,43733,44590,44945,45333</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mi Jeong</creatorcontrib><title>A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction</title><title>SAGE open</title><description>Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologies rather than on user factors. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the current status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. For our critical review, we developed an evaluation framework based on our definition of human–building interaction. Our results identified there are limitations in smart residential environments research: a lack of consideration of human-building interaction in the field of the built environment, an excessive focus on the user–technology interaction for performance, and less consideration of urban and architectural design issues regarding human–building interaction. To bridge the gap in the research, the three key points are discussed. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for designing and delivering improved smart residential environments, emphasizing the role of stakeholders in each smart residential environment lifecycle stage to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.
Plain language summary
A critical review of smart residential environment
Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologie. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. Our results identified limitations in smart residential environments research. The three key points are discussed to bridge the research gap. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for delivering improved smart residential environments to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><issn>2158-2440</issn><issn>2158-2440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KAzEQxxdRsNQ-gLcFz6353GSPtbS2UBD8OIdskq0p201NdivefAff0Ccx64oKYi7J_Gb-_8kwSXIOwQRCxi4RpBwRAhCBiOcckqNk0LFxB49_vU-TUQhbEA8FlBA0SOQ0nXnbWCWr9NYcrHlOXZne7aRvYhysNnVjY25eH6x39S6GHTfSq8d04VQbbL1Jl-1O1u-vb1etrXQHVnVjvFSNdfVZclLKKpjR1z1MHhbz-9lyvL65Xs2m67HCADdjzcs8YxgTifKMUiwNLwjTqORUq4IxTKmkGcQ0lxnThBjKSkV0ATAjiCmOh8mq99VObsXe2zjDi3DSik_g_EbEoayqjKAUACQzrDAuSIFQzqSmWZYzUkBMuIpeF73X3run1oRGbF3r6_h9gSHJGUMMdx1hX6W8C8Gb8rsrBKJbjPizmKiZ9JogN-bH9X_BB2NyjAc</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Yang, Hyungmo</creator><creator>Kim, Mi Jeong</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8292-5231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-2741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction</title><author>Yang, Hyungmo ; Kim, Mi Jeong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d8f967334a296553ae8b47d2f85dcb77355a561359a67d44e57fc4db037427c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Hyungmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Mi Jeong</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SAGE open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Hyungmo</au><au>Kim, Mi Jeong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction</atitle><jtitle>SAGE open</jtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2158-2440</issn><eissn>2158-2440</eissn><abstract>Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologies rather than on user factors. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the current status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. For our critical review, we developed an evaluation framework based on our definition of human–building interaction. Our results identified there are limitations in smart residential environments research: a lack of consideration of human-building interaction in the field of the built environment, an excessive focus on the user–technology interaction for performance, and less consideration of urban and architectural design issues regarding human–building interaction. To bridge the gap in the research, the three key points are discussed. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for designing and delivering improved smart residential environments, emphasizing the role of stakeholders in each smart residential environment lifecycle stage to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.
Plain language summary
A critical review of smart residential environment
Most studies on smart residential environments have focused on adopting cutting-edge technologie. There is little research on interaction with building technologies to support residents’ experiences in smart residential environments. This paper explores the status of smart residential environment research from the human–building interaction perspective through a critical review of articles published in Q1 journals during 2013 to 2022. Our results identified limitations in smart residential environments research. The three key points are discussed to bridge the research gap. Last, we propose a conceptual framework for delivering improved smart residential environments to achieve a balanced interaction between the three key elements: users, the built environment, and technologies.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/21582440241289814</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8292-5231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-2741</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2158-2440 |
ispartof | SAGE open, 2024-10, Vol.14 (4) |
issn | 2158-2440 2158-2440 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_55002a63c33b4b2297ad566974b1348c |
source | SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Built environment |
title | A Critical Review of Smart Residential Environment Research Focusing Human–Building Interaction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Smart%20Residential%20Environment%20Research%20Focusing%20Human%E2%80%93Building%20Interaction&rft.jtitle=SAGE%20open&rft.au=Yang,%20Hyungmo&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2158-2440&rft.eissn=2158-2440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21582440241289814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3149772738%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-d8f967334a296553ae8b47d2f85dcb77355a561359a67d44e57fc4db037427c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149772738&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21582440241289814&rfr_iscdi=true |