Loading…

Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review

Abstract This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jornal vascular brasileiro 2022-01, Vol.21, p.e20210229-e20210229
Main Authors: Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de, Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt, Silva, Whesley Tanor, Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral, Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues, Lima, Vanessa Pereira, Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho, Costa, Henrique Silveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3
container_end_page e20210229
container_issue
container_start_page e20210229
container_title Jornal vascular brasileiro
container_volume 21
creator Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de
Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
Silva, Whesley Tanor
Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral
Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
Lima, Vanessa Pereira
Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho
Costa, Henrique Silveira
description Abstract This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were related to “venous insufficiency”, and “quality of life”. The CIVIQ-20 and CIVIQ-14 instruments had adequate internal consistency and both were able to discriminate disease severity. The VEINES-QoL showed adequate internal consistency but was not able to discriminate disease severity. Most studies did not demonstrate a correlation between VEINES-QoL and the mental component of the SF-36. The AVVQ had inadequate reliability but its validity was also doubtful when compared to the SF-36. The VARIShort demonstrated good internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity, but only the original study was included. For venous leg ulcers, the CCVUQ showed adequate reliability and validity when compared to VLU-QoL. Resumo Esta revisão sistemática objetivou discutir os principais achados sobre a confiabilidade e validade dos questionários de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde na insuficiência venosa crônica. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS e Scopus. Os termos de busca foram relacionados a “insuficiência venosa” e “qualidade de vida”. O Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ)-20 e o CIVIQ-14 apresentaram consistência interna adequada e foram capazes de discriminar a gravidade da doença. O Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study – Quality of Life (VEINES-QoL) apresentou consistência interna adequada, mas não foi capaz de discriminar a gravidade da doença. A maioria dos estudos não demonstrou associação do VEINES-QoL com o componente mental do Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). O Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) apresentou confiabilidade inadequada e validade duvidosa quando comparado ao SF-36. O VARIShort demonstrou consistência interna, reprodutibilidade e validade boas, mas apenas o estudo original foi incluído. Na úlcera venosa, o Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) apresentou confiabilidade e validade adequadas quando comparado ao Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of Life (VLU-QoL).
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1677-5449.202102292
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5513a2e2c536466896eaf17475685867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S1677_54492022000100406</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5513a2e2c536466896eaf17475685867</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2738496301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1vGyEQXVWNlCjNL-iFYy92-VpYequifkSKVKltzmiWHVIiDC6sXfk39E-HtS2fgMebNzPvdd17RtesN_QjU1qveinNmlPOKOeGv-lujqgWlL093xfGdXdXaxiplFoKSuVN9_8nxgBjiGE-EEgT2UMM0_LIntQtuuCDI393EM9YDB4J1Iq1bjDN7QvrHHJKEApWUjDCjBOZM3F_Sk6teI8p7yoJqe58EwuY3OETAVIPdcYNzI1ScB_w37vuykOseHc-b7unr19-339fPf749nD_-XHlhOLzCifT1hxHYTzK3qNQoLkZeuaRTXTywiNlTo2ejkpNBkeFXI7ADGruRzmJ2-7hpDtleLHbEjZQDjZDsEcgl2cLpY0V0fY9E8CRu14oqdRgFIJnWupeDf2gdNNan7RqWyxm-5J3JbXh7a_FdLuY3lLhlFLW_KaqFXw4FWxLPnpnN6E6jBESNpss12KQRrXgGlWcqK7kWgv6y6yM2iV6e-lhL9GLV72uoao</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738496301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de ; Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt ; Silva, Whesley Tanor ; Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral ; Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues ; Lima, Vanessa Pereira ; Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho ; Costa, Henrique Silveira</creator><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de ; Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt ; Silva, Whesley Tanor ; Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral ; Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues ; Lima, Vanessa Pereira ; Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho ; Costa, Henrique Silveira</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were related to “venous insufficiency”, and “quality of life”. The CIVIQ-20 and CIVIQ-14 instruments had adequate internal consistency and both were able to discriminate disease severity. The VEINES-QoL showed adequate internal consistency but was not able to discriminate disease severity. Most studies did not demonstrate a correlation between VEINES-QoL and the mental component of the SF-36. The AVVQ had inadequate reliability but its validity was also doubtful when compared to the SF-36. The VARIShort demonstrated good internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity, but only the original study was included. For venous leg ulcers, the CCVUQ showed adequate reliability and validity when compared to VLU-QoL. Resumo Esta revisão sistemática objetivou discutir os principais achados sobre a confiabilidade e validade dos questionários de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde na insuficiência venosa crônica. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS e Scopus. Os termos de busca foram relacionados a “insuficiência venosa” e “qualidade de vida”. O Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ)-20 e o CIVIQ-14 apresentaram consistência interna adequada e foram capazes de discriminar a gravidade da doença. O Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study – Quality of Life (VEINES-QoL) apresentou consistência interna adequada, mas não foi capaz de discriminar a gravidade da doença. A maioria dos estudos não demonstrou associação do VEINES-QoL com o componente mental do Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). O Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) apresentou confiabilidade inadequada e validade duvidosa quando comparado ao SF-36. O VARIShort demonstrou consistência interna, reprodutibilidade e validade boas, mas apenas o estudo original foi incluído. Na úlcera venosa, o Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) apresentou confiabilidade e validade adequadas quando comparado ao Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of Life (VLU-QoL).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1677-5449</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1677-7301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1677-7301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1677-5449.202102292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)</publisher><subject>CARDIAC &amp; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ; patient health questionnaire ; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE ; quality of life ; SURGERY ; validation study ; venous insufficiency</subject><ispartof>Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2022-01, Vol.21, p.e20210229-e20210229</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5366-3754 ; 0000-0002-2414-3730 ; 0000-0002-1696-6091 ; 0000-0002-1426-7246 ; 0000-0002-0349-3248 ; 0000-0001-8883-9692 ; 0000-0002-5783-1820 ; 0000-0002-6748-3081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24149,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Whesley Tanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Vanessa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Henrique Silveira</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review</title><title>Jornal vascular brasileiro</title><addtitle>J. vasc. bras</addtitle><description>Abstract This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were related to “venous insufficiency”, and “quality of life”. The CIVIQ-20 and CIVIQ-14 instruments had adequate internal consistency and both were able to discriminate disease severity. The VEINES-QoL showed adequate internal consistency but was not able to discriminate disease severity. Most studies did not demonstrate a correlation between VEINES-QoL and the mental component of the SF-36. The AVVQ had inadequate reliability but its validity was also doubtful when compared to the SF-36. The VARIShort demonstrated good internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity, but only the original study was included. For venous leg ulcers, the CCVUQ showed adequate reliability and validity when compared to VLU-QoL. Resumo Esta revisão sistemática objetivou discutir os principais achados sobre a confiabilidade e validade dos questionários de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde na insuficiência venosa crônica. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS e Scopus. Os termos de busca foram relacionados a “insuficiência venosa” e “qualidade de vida”. O Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ)-20 e o CIVIQ-14 apresentaram consistência interna adequada e foram capazes de discriminar a gravidade da doença. O Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study – Quality of Life (VEINES-QoL) apresentou consistência interna adequada, mas não foi capaz de discriminar a gravidade da doença. A maioria dos estudos não demonstrou associação do VEINES-QoL com o componente mental do Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). O Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) apresentou confiabilidade inadequada e validade duvidosa quando comparado ao SF-36. O VARIShort demonstrou consistência interna, reprodutibilidade e validade boas, mas apenas o estudo original foi incluído. Na úlcera venosa, o Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) apresentou confiabilidade e validade adequadas quando comparado ao Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of Life (VLU-QoL).</description><subject>CARDIAC &amp; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS</subject><subject>patient health questionnaire</subject><subject>PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><subject>validation study</subject><subject>venous insufficiency</subject><issn>1677-5449</issn><issn>1677-7301</issn><issn>1677-7301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU1vGyEQXVWNlCjNL-iFYy92-VpYequifkSKVKltzmiWHVIiDC6sXfk39E-HtS2fgMebNzPvdd17RtesN_QjU1qveinNmlPOKOeGv-lujqgWlL093xfGdXdXaxiplFoKSuVN9_8nxgBjiGE-EEgT2UMM0_LIntQtuuCDI393EM9YDB4J1Iq1bjDN7QvrHHJKEApWUjDCjBOZM3F_Sk6teI8p7yoJqe58EwuY3OETAVIPdcYNzI1ScB_w37vuykOseHc-b7unr19-339fPf749nD_-XHlhOLzCifT1hxHYTzK3qNQoLkZeuaRTXTywiNlTo2ejkpNBkeFXI7ADGruRzmJ2-7hpDtleLHbEjZQDjZDsEcgl2cLpY0V0fY9E8CRu14oqdRgFIJnWupeDf2gdNNan7RqWyxm-5J3JbXh7a_FdLuY3lLhlFLW_KaqFXw4FWxLPnpnN6E6jBESNpss12KQRrXgGlWcqK7kWgv6y6yM2iV6e-lhL9GLV72uoao</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt</creator><creator>Silva, Whesley Tanor</creator><creator>Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral</creator><creator>Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues</creator><creator>Lima, Vanessa Pereira</creator><creator>Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho</creator><creator>Costa, Henrique Silveira</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-3754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-3730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1696-6091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-9692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-1820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-3081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review</title><author>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de ; Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt ; Silva, Whesley Tanor ; Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral ; Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues ; Lima, Vanessa Pereira ; Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho ; Costa, Henrique Silveira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>CARDIAC &amp; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS</topic><topic>patient health questionnaire</topic><topic>PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><topic>validation study</topic><topic>venous insufficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Whesley Tanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Vanessa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Henrique Silveira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Jornal vascular brasileiro</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almeida, Igor Lucas Geraldo Izalino de</au><au>Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt</au><au>Silva, Whesley Tanor</au><au>Mendonça, Vanessa Amaral</au><au>Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues</au><au>Lima, Vanessa Pereira</au><au>Bastone, Alessandra de Carvalho</au><au>Costa, Henrique Silveira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Jornal vascular brasileiro</jtitle><addtitle>J. vasc. bras</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>e20210229</spage><epage>e20210229</epage><pages>e20210229-e20210229</pages><issn>1677-5449</issn><issn>1677-7301</issn><eissn>1677-7301</eissn><abstract>Abstract This systematic review aimed to discuss the main findings regarding the reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaires for chronic venous insufficiency. Searches were performed on the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS, and Scopus databases. The search terms used were related to “venous insufficiency”, and “quality of life”. The CIVIQ-20 and CIVIQ-14 instruments had adequate internal consistency and both were able to discriminate disease severity. The VEINES-QoL showed adequate internal consistency but was not able to discriminate disease severity. Most studies did not demonstrate a correlation between VEINES-QoL and the mental component of the SF-36. The AVVQ had inadequate reliability but its validity was also doubtful when compared to the SF-36. The VARIShort demonstrated good internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity, but only the original study was included. For venous leg ulcers, the CCVUQ showed adequate reliability and validity when compared to VLU-QoL. Resumo Esta revisão sistemática objetivou discutir os principais achados sobre a confiabilidade e validade dos questionários de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde na insuficiência venosa crônica. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS e Scopus. Os termos de busca foram relacionados a “insuficiência venosa” e “qualidade de vida”. O Chronic Lower Limb Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ)-20 e o CIVIQ-14 apresentaram consistência interna adequada e foram capazes de discriminar a gravidade da doença. O Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study – Quality of Life (VEINES-QoL) apresentou consistência interna adequada, mas não foi capaz de discriminar a gravidade da doença. A maioria dos estudos não demonstrou associação do VEINES-QoL com o componente mental do Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). O Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) apresentou confiabilidade inadequada e validade duvidosa quando comparado ao SF-36. O VARIShort demonstrou consistência interna, reprodutibilidade e validade boas, mas apenas o estudo original foi incluído. Na úlcera venosa, o Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) apresentou confiabilidade e validade adequadas quando comparado ao Venous Leg Ulcer Quality of Life (VLU-QoL).</abstract><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)</pub><doi>10.1590/1677-5449.202102292</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-3754</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2414-3730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1696-6091</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-7246</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-3248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8883-9692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-1820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6748-3081</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1677-5449
ispartof Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2022-01, Vol.21, p.e20210229-e20210229
issn 1677-5449
1677-7301
1677-7301
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5513a2e2c536466896eaf17475685867
source SciELO Brazil; PubMed Central
subjects CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
patient health questionnaire
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
quality of life
SURGERY
validation study
venous insufficiency
title Reliability and validity of specific quality of life assessment questionnaires related to chronic venous insufficiency: a systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A13%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20validity%20of%20specific%20quality%20of%20life%20assessment%20questionnaires%20related%20to%20chronic%20venous%20insufficiency:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Jornal%20vascular%20brasileiro&rft.au=Almeida,%20Igor%20Lucas%20Geraldo%20Izalino%20de&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=e20210229&rft.epage=e20210229&rft.pages=e20210229-e20210229&rft.issn=1677-5449&rft.eissn=1677-7301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1677-5449.202102292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2738496301%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ed9210bb39fe45fe36a729851fe1d0df3fe01c6bf0b66d9eb6e24ba19e72fb4d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738496301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S1677_54492022000100406&rfr_iscdi=true