Loading…

Comparison Between Caudal and Combined Caudal with Spinal Anesthesia in Paediatric Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery

Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effect profile of using caudal anaesthesia versus caudal combined with spinal anaesthesia for paediatric patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Anaesthe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2023-12, Vol.73 (6), p.1786-1789
Main Authors: Ali Hashmi, Syed Rafat, Ali Shah, Syed Qasim, Tariq, Waqas, Sarfaraz, Ahmed, Hassam bhalli, Hafiz Ahmed, Khan, Taimur Azam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effect profile of using caudal anaesthesia versus caudal combined with spinal anaesthesia for paediatric patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: Anaesthesia Department of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Mar to Aug 2022. Methodology: Eighty paediatric patients between ages 5-10 years requiring bilateral inguinal hernia repair were included in the study. The Caudal Group received 0.25% Bupivacaine per the Armitage regime at a 1 ml/kg volume to reach an effective sensory level of T10. The Combined Group received spinal anaesthesia at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg for >15 kg patients and 0.4 mg/kg for 5-15 kg patients in the L4-L5 epidural space for an effective spinal level of T10. Once the spinal was administered, the same caudal dose as per the caudal Group's Armitage regime. Results: The total duration of block and subsequent reversal to the S1 level was 326.2±12.6 minutes in the Caudal Group versus 441.22±31.8 minutes in the Combined Group (p
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v73i6.10168