Loading…

Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq

Prediction of the formation of pore and fracture pressure before constructing a drilling wells program are a crucial since it helps to prevent several drilling operations issues including lost circulation, kick, pipe sticking, blowout, and other issues. IP (Interactive Petrophysics) software is used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online) 2023-03, Vol.24 (1), p.65-78
Main Authors: AlHusseini, Ahmed K., Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 78
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online)
container_volume 24
creator AlHusseini, Ahmed K.
Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.
description Prediction of the formation of pore and fracture pressure before constructing a drilling wells program are a crucial since it helps to prevent several drilling operations issues including lost circulation, kick, pipe sticking, blowout, and other issues. IP (Interactive Petrophysics) software is used to calculate and measure pore and fracture pressure. Eaton method, Matthews and Kelly, Modified Eaton, and Barker and Wood equations are used to calculate fracture pressure, whereas only Eaton method is used to measure pore pressure. These approaches are based on log data obtained from six wells, three from the north dome; BUCN-52, BUCN-51, BUCN-43 and the other from the south dome; BUCS-49, BUCS-48, BUCS-47. Along with the overburden pressure gradient and clay volume, which were also established first, data such as gamma ray, density, resistivity, and sonic log data are also required. A key consideration in the design of certain wells is the forecasting of fracture pressure for wells drilled in the southern Iraqi oilfield of Buzurgan. The pressure abnormality is found in MA, MB21, MC1 and MC2 units by depending on pore pressures calculated from resistivity log. In these units, depths and its equivalent normal and abnormal pressure are detected for all sex selected wells; BUCS-47, BUCS-48, BUCS-49, BUCN-43, BUCN-51 and BBCN-52. For MA, MB21, MC1, and MC2 units, the highest difference in pore pressure values are 1698 psi @ 3750 m (BUCN-51), 3420 psi @ 3900 m (BUCN-51), 788 psi @ 3980 m (BUCS-49), and 5705 psi @ 4020 m (BUCN-52). On other hands, MB11 and MB12 units have normal pressure trend in all studied wells. Finally, the results show that the highest pore and fracture pressure values is existed in North dome, in comparison with that obtained in south dome of Mishrif reservoir at Buzurgan oilfield.
doi_str_mv 10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5599a745e80e4a668967b30d18aba072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5599a745e80e4a668967b30d18aba072</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_5599a745e80e4a668967b30d18aba072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1062-8b4cf9ef5c0e12548e350c8065e3dce271d09bcb11c93a2a9e358b4972005063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwkAQxTdGEwly9rpfoGV22-4fPQmC1mAgkftmut1iSaW4Ww746S1gPM3Mm5lf8h4h9wzihAmtx_nbdDWLOfAkZrG6IgMumIpAgrwmA6a1jFKl0lsyCmELAFylOpViQPaz0NVf2NXtjq5a7yjuSjr3aLtDP6y8C-HUTDC4kvY3i3ZDn7HDRzrtJfrRHcrjA32vw6evKzpv_YU1nhx-Dn6DO7qsm6p2TUmxo7nH7ztyU2ET3OivDsl6PltPX6PF8iWfPi0iy0DwSBWprbSrMguO8SxVLsnAKhCZS0rruGQl6MIWjFmdIEfd7_sfLTlABiIZkvyCLVvcmr3vPfqjabE2Z6H1G4O-q23jTJZpjTLNnAKXohBKC1kkUDKFBYLkPWt8YVnfhuBd9c9jYM7xm3P85hS_YUYlvzwRdwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq</title><source>Science Journals (Open access)</source><creator>AlHusseini, Ahmed K. ; Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</creator><creatorcontrib>AlHusseini, Ahmed K. ; Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</creatorcontrib><description>Prediction of the formation of pore and fracture pressure before constructing a drilling wells program are a crucial since it helps to prevent several drilling operations issues including lost circulation, kick, pipe sticking, blowout, and other issues. IP (Interactive Petrophysics) software is used to calculate and measure pore and fracture pressure. Eaton method, Matthews and Kelly, Modified Eaton, and Barker and Wood equations are used to calculate fracture pressure, whereas only Eaton method is used to measure pore pressure. These approaches are based on log data obtained from six wells, three from the north dome; BUCN-52, BUCN-51, BUCN-43 and the other from the south dome; BUCS-49, BUCS-48, BUCS-47. Along with the overburden pressure gradient and clay volume, which were also established first, data such as gamma ray, density, resistivity, and sonic log data are also required. A key consideration in the design of certain wells is the forecasting of fracture pressure for wells drilled in the southern Iraqi oilfield of Buzurgan. The pressure abnormality is found in MA, MB21, MC1 and MC2 units by depending on pore pressures calculated from resistivity log. In these units, depths and its equivalent normal and abnormal pressure are detected for all sex selected wells; BUCS-47, BUCS-48, BUCS-49, BUCN-43, BUCN-51 and BBCN-52. For MA, MB21, MC1, and MC2 units, the highest difference in pore pressure values are 1698 psi @ 3750 m (BUCN-51), 3420 psi @ 3900 m (BUCN-51), 788 psi @ 3980 m (BUCS-49), and 5705 psi @ 4020 m (BUCN-52). On other hands, MB11 and MB12 units have normal pressure trend in all studied wells. Finally, the results show that the highest pore and fracture pressure values is existed in North dome, in comparison with that obtained in south dome of Mishrif reservoir at Buzurgan oilfield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1997-4884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2618-0707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Baghdad/College of Engineering</publisher><subject>Pore pressure, Fracture pressure, Overburden pressure, Clay volume, Eaton method, Sonic log, Resistivity log, Abnormal pressure</subject><ispartof>Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online), 2023-03, Vol.24 (1), p.65-78</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>AlHusseini, Ahmed K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq</title><title>Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online)</title><description>Prediction of the formation of pore and fracture pressure before constructing a drilling wells program are a crucial since it helps to prevent several drilling operations issues including lost circulation, kick, pipe sticking, blowout, and other issues. IP (Interactive Petrophysics) software is used to calculate and measure pore and fracture pressure. Eaton method, Matthews and Kelly, Modified Eaton, and Barker and Wood equations are used to calculate fracture pressure, whereas only Eaton method is used to measure pore pressure. These approaches are based on log data obtained from six wells, three from the north dome; BUCN-52, BUCN-51, BUCN-43 and the other from the south dome; BUCS-49, BUCS-48, BUCS-47. Along with the overburden pressure gradient and clay volume, which were also established first, data such as gamma ray, density, resistivity, and sonic log data are also required. A key consideration in the design of certain wells is the forecasting of fracture pressure for wells drilled in the southern Iraqi oilfield of Buzurgan. The pressure abnormality is found in MA, MB21, MC1 and MC2 units by depending on pore pressures calculated from resistivity log. In these units, depths and its equivalent normal and abnormal pressure are detected for all sex selected wells; BUCS-47, BUCS-48, BUCS-49, BUCN-43, BUCN-51 and BBCN-52. For MA, MB21, MC1, and MC2 units, the highest difference in pore pressure values are 1698 psi @ 3750 m (BUCN-51), 3420 psi @ 3900 m (BUCN-51), 788 psi @ 3980 m (BUCS-49), and 5705 psi @ 4020 m (BUCN-52). On other hands, MB11 and MB12 units have normal pressure trend in all studied wells. Finally, the results show that the highest pore and fracture pressure values is existed in North dome, in comparison with that obtained in south dome of Mishrif reservoir at Buzurgan oilfield.</description><subject>Pore pressure, Fracture pressure, Overburden pressure, Clay volume, Eaton method, Sonic log, Resistivity log, Abnormal pressure</subject><issn>1997-4884</issn><issn>2618-0707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwkAQxTdGEwly9rpfoGV22-4fPQmC1mAgkftmut1iSaW4Ww746S1gPM3Mm5lf8h4h9wzihAmtx_nbdDWLOfAkZrG6IgMumIpAgrwmA6a1jFKl0lsyCmELAFylOpViQPaz0NVf2NXtjq5a7yjuSjr3aLtDP6y8C-HUTDC4kvY3i3ZDn7HDRzrtJfrRHcrjA32vw6evKzpv_YU1nhx-Dn6DO7qsm6p2TUmxo7nH7ztyU2ET3OivDsl6PltPX6PF8iWfPi0iy0DwSBWprbSrMguO8SxVLsnAKhCZS0rruGQl6MIWjFmdIEfd7_sfLTlABiIZkvyCLVvcmr3vPfqjabE2Z6H1G4O-q23jTJZpjTLNnAKXohBKC1kkUDKFBYLkPWt8YVnfhuBd9c9jYM7xm3P85hS_YUYlvzwRdwk</recordid><startdate>20230329</startdate><enddate>20230329</enddate><creator>AlHusseini, Ahmed K.</creator><creator>Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</creator><general>University of Baghdad/College of Engineering</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230329</creationdate><title>Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq</title><author>AlHusseini, Ahmed K. ; Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1062-8b4cf9ef5c0e12548e350c8065e3dce271d09bcb11c93a2a9e358b4972005063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Pore pressure, Fracture pressure, Overburden pressure, Clay volume, Eaton method, Sonic log, Resistivity log, Abnormal pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AlHusseini, Ahmed K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AlHusseini, Ahmed K.</au><au>Hamed-Allah, Sameera M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq</atitle><jtitle>Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online)</jtitle><date>2023-03-29</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>65-78</pages><issn>1997-4884</issn><eissn>2618-0707</eissn><abstract>Prediction of the formation of pore and fracture pressure before constructing a drilling wells program are a crucial since it helps to prevent several drilling operations issues including lost circulation, kick, pipe sticking, blowout, and other issues. IP (Interactive Petrophysics) software is used to calculate and measure pore and fracture pressure. Eaton method, Matthews and Kelly, Modified Eaton, and Barker and Wood equations are used to calculate fracture pressure, whereas only Eaton method is used to measure pore pressure. These approaches are based on log data obtained from six wells, three from the north dome; BUCN-52, BUCN-51, BUCN-43 and the other from the south dome; BUCS-49, BUCS-48, BUCS-47. Along with the overburden pressure gradient and clay volume, which were also established first, data such as gamma ray, density, resistivity, and sonic log data are also required. A key consideration in the design of certain wells is the forecasting of fracture pressure for wells drilled in the southern Iraqi oilfield of Buzurgan. The pressure abnormality is found in MA, MB21, MC1 and MC2 units by depending on pore pressures calculated from resistivity log. In these units, depths and its equivalent normal and abnormal pressure are detected for all sex selected wells; BUCS-47, BUCS-48, BUCS-49, BUCN-43, BUCN-51 and BBCN-52. For MA, MB21, MC1, and MC2 units, the highest difference in pore pressure values are 1698 psi @ 3750 m (BUCN-51), 3420 psi @ 3900 m (BUCN-51), 788 psi @ 3980 m (BUCS-49), and 5705 psi @ 4020 m (BUCN-52). On other hands, MB11 and MB12 units have normal pressure trend in all studied wells. Finally, the results show that the highest pore and fracture pressure values is existed in North dome, in comparison with that obtained in south dome of Mishrif reservoir at Buzurgan oilfield.</abstract><pub>University of Baghdad/College of Engineering</pub><doi>10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1997-4884
ispartof Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering (Online), 2023-03, Vol.24 (1), p.65-78
issn 1997-4884
2618-0707
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5599a745e80e4a668967b30d18aba072
source Science Journals (Open access)
subjects Pore pressure, Fracture pressure, Overburden pressure, Clay volume, Eaton method, Sonic log, Resistivity log, Abnormal pressure
title Estimation Pore and Fracture Pressure Based on Log Data; Case Study: Mishrif Formation/Buzurgan Oilfield at Iraq
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20Pore%20and%20Fracture%20Pressure%20Based%20on%20Log%20Data;%20Case%20Study:%20Mishrif%20Formation/Buzurgan%20Oilfield%20at%20Iraq&rft.jtitle=Iraqi%20Journal%20of%20Chemical%20and%20Petroleum%20Engineering%20(Online)&rft.au=AlHusseini,%20Ahmed%20K.&rft.date=2023-03-29&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=65-78&rft.issn=1997-4884&rft.eissn=2618-0707&rft_id=info:doi/10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.8&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_5599a745e80e4a668967b30d18aba072%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1062-8b4cf9ef5c0e12548e350c8065e3dce271d09bcb11c93a2a9e358b4972005063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true