Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults

Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Obesity 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.603-607
Main Authors: de Oliveira, Erick Prado, Orsatti, Fábio Lera, Teixeira, Okesley, Maestá, Nailza, Burini, Roberto Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173
container_end_page 607
container_issue 2011
container_start_page 603
container_title Journal of Obesity
container_volume 2011
creator de Oliveira, Erick Prado
Orsatti, Fábio Lera
Teixeira, Okesley
Maestá, Nailza
Burini, Roberto Carlos
description Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estimated by IC and other five equations of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2, Owen, Mifflin). Results. All equations had different values when compared to those of IC. The best values were found by Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high values of intraclass correlation coefficient and low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1 and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and random. Conclusion. No predictive equations had the same values of REE as compared to those of indirect calorimetry, and those which least underestimated REE were the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and Benedict. The next step would be to validate the new equation proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2011/534714
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5631b3b7a8a3409abf304a1f9a97b43c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20151217004_201112_201703070009_201703070009_603_607</airiti_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5631b3b7a8a3409abf304a1f9a97b43c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>883313037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtPYE88gvyENlV1_pE5ekKaqwKRKnRA8G8e5SV2ldmcnHfvvcZZR0ScsWb62j34-9nGWvaXwidI8v2ZA6XXOhaTiRXbOoIQZSDp_eayhOMsuY9xCarwoc8leZ2eMFoyJQpxnvxZ-t9fBRu-Ib8hdwNqa3h6QLO8H3VvvIml8IN8x9ta1ZOkwtI9k-XuPrrb9EJBYR9YHDA9o201PtKvJusKI5KYeuj6-yV41uot4-TxeZD-_LH8svs1W66-3i5vVTCdL_ayC2ghoAOY5rQwVJjfIsClLLmFuisqY8Yp1nc-BawDDS8RaGJ2q1KjkF9ntxK293qp9sDsdHpXXVj0t-NAqHXprOlT5nNOKV1IXmgsoddVwEJo2pS5lJbhJrM8Taz9UO6wNuj7o7gR6uuPsRrX-oDgVTEqWAB-eAcHfD-np1M5Gg12nHfohqqJInjnw0fbHSWmCjzFgczyFghoTVmPCako4qd__a-yo_ZtnElxNgo11tX6w_6G9m8SYJNjoo1jIkhejt9W0r22wvVVbPwSXMlR3iZJTRiWAeCJSNg4SePpvAOXpJCWWuuR_AD3BzDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883313037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><creator>de Oliveira, Erick Prado ; Orsatti, Fábio Lera ; Teixeira, Okesley ; Maestá, Nailza ; Burini, Roberto Carlos</creator><contributor>Yanovski, Jack A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Erick Prado ; Orsatti, Fábio Lera ; Teixeira, Okesley ; Maestá, Nailza ; Burini, Roberto Carlos ; Yanovski, Jack A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estimated by IC and other five equations of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2, Owen, Mifflin). Results. All equations had different values when compared to those of IC. The best values were found by Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high values of intraclass correlation coefficient and low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1 and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and random. Conclusion. No predictive equations had the same values of REE as compared to those of indirect calorimetry, and those which least underestimated REE were the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and Benedict. The next step would be to validate the new equation proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-0708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-0716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2011/534714</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21822484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Obesity, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.603-607</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Erick Prado de Oliveira et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Erick Prado de Oliveira et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142772/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142772/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yanovski, Jack A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Erick Prado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsatti, Fábio Lera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Okesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestá, Nailza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burini, Roberto Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults</title><title>Journal of Obesity</title><addtitle>J Obes</addtitle><description>Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estimated by IC and other five equations of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2, Owen, Mifflin). Results. All equations had different values when compared to those of IC. The best values were found by Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high values of intraclass correlation coefficient and low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1 and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and random. Conclusion. No predictive equations had the same values of REE as compared to those of indirect calorimetry, and those which least underestimated REE were the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and Benedict. The next step would be to validate the new equation proposed.</description><issn>2090-0708</issn><issn>2090-0716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt1v0zAUxSMEYtPYE88gvyENlV1_pE5ekKaqwKRKnRA8G8e5SV2ldmcnHfvvcZZR0ScsWb62j34-9nGWvaXwidI8v2ZA6XXOhaTiRXbOoIQZSDp_eayhOMsuY9xCarwoc8leZ2eMFoyJQpxnvxZ-t9fBRu-Ib8hdwNqa3h6QLO8H3VvvIml8IN8x9ta1ZOkwtI9k-XuPrrb9EJBYR9YHDA9o201PtKvJusKI5KYeuj6-yV41uot4-TxeZD-_LH8svs1W66-3i5vVTCdL_ayC2ghoAOY5rQwVJjfIsClLLmFuisqY8Yp1nc-BawDDS8RaGJ2q1KjkF9ntxK293qp9sDsdHpXXVj0t-NAqHXprOlT5nNOKV1IXmgsoddVwEJo2pS5lJbhJrM8Taz9UO6wNuj7o7gR6uuPsRrX-oDgVTEqWAB-eAcHfD-np1M5Gg12nHfohqqJInjnw0fbHSWmCjzFgczyFghoTVmPCako4qd__a-yo_ZtnElxNgo11tX6w_6G9m8SYJNjoo1jIkhejt9W0r22wvVVbPwSXMlR3iZJTRiWAeCJSNg4SePpvAOXpJCWWuuR_AD3BzDA</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>de Oliveira, Erick Prado</creator><creator>Orsatti, Fábio Lera</creator><creator>Teixeira, Okesley</creator><creator>Maestá, Nailza</creator><creator>Burini, Roberto Carlos</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults</title><author>de Oliveira, Erick Prado ; Orsatti, Fábio Lera ; Teixeira, Okesley ; Maestá, Nailza ; Burini, Roberto Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Erick Prado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orsatti, Fábio Lera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Okesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maestá, Nailza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burini, Roberto Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Oliveira, Erick Prado</au><au>Orsatti, Fábio Lera</au><au>Teixeira, Okesley</au><au>Maestá, Nailza</au><au>Burini, Roberto Carlos</au><au>Yanovski, Jack A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Obesity</jtitle><addtitle>J Obes</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>2011</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>603-607</pages><issn>2090-0708</issn><eissn>2090-0716</eissn><abstract>Objective. To compare values from predictive equations of resting energy expenditure (REE) with indirect calorimetry (IC) in overweight and obese adults. Methods. Eighty-two participants aged 30 to 60 years old were retrospectively analyzed. The persons had a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. REE was estimated by IC and other five equations of the literature (Harris and Benedict, WHO1, WHO2, Owen, Mifflin). Results. All equations had different values when compared to those of IC. The best values were found by Harris and Benedict, WHO1, and WHO2, with high values of intraclass correlation coefficient and low values of mean difference. Furthermore, WHO1 and WHO2 showed lower systematic error and random. Conclusion. No predictive equations had the same values of REE as compared to those of indirect calorimetry, and those which least underestimated REE were the equations of WHO1, WHO2, and Harris and Benedict. The next step would be to validate the new equation proposed.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>21822484</pmid><doi>10.1155/2011/534714</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-0708
ispartof Journal of Obesity, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.603-607
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5631b3b7a8a3409abf304a1f9a97b43c
source PubMed Central (Open Access); Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection
title Comparison of Predictive Equations for Resting Energy Expenditure in Overweight and Obese Adults
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A59%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Predictive%20Equations%20for%20Resting%20Energy%20Expenditure%20in%20Overweight%20and%20Obese%20Adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Obesity&rft.au=de%20Oliveira,%20Erick%20Prado&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=2011&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=603-607&rft.issn=2090-0708&rft.eissn=2090-0716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2011/534714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E883313037%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-b0dc40f00651bc14c5ce2ef993706c8bcc4714dd5603a00c39eed4ca0c3333173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883313037&rft_id=info:pmid/21822484&rft_airiti_id=P20151217004_201112_201703070009_201703070009_603_607&rfr_iscdi=true