Loading…

Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol

Globally, good health system performance has resulted from continuous reform, including adaptation of Decentralisation by Devolution policies, for example, the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Generally, the role of decentralisation in the health sector is to improve efficiency, to foster in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health research policy and systems 2019-01, Vol.17 (1), p.11-11, Article 11
Main Authors: Kapologwe, Ntuli A, Kalolo, Albino, Kibusi, Stephen M, Chaula, Zainab, Nswilla, Anna, Teuscher, Thomas, Aung, Kyaw, Borghi, Josephine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Health research policy and systems
container_volume 17
creator Kapologwe, Ntuli A
Kalolo, Albino
Kibusi, Stephen M
Chaula, Zainab
Nswilla, Anna
Teuscher, Thomas
Aung, Kyaw
Borghi, Josephine
description Globally, good health system performance has resulted from continuous reform, including adaptation of Decentralisation by Devolution policies, for example, the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Generally, the role of decentralisation in the health sector is to improve efficiency, to foster innovations and to improve quality, patient experience and accountability. However, such improvements have not been well realised in most low- and middle-income countries, with the main reason cited being the poor mechanism for disbursement of funds, which remain largely centralised. The introduction of the DHFF programme in Tanzania is expected to help improve the quality of health service delivery and increase service utilisation resulting in improved health system performance. This paper describes the protocol, which aims to evaluate the effects of DHFF on health system performance in Tanzania. An evaluation of the effect of the DHFF programme will be carried out as part of a nationwide programme rollout. A before and after non-controlled concurrent mixed methods design study will be employed to examine the effect of the DHFF programme implementation on the structural quality of maternal health, health facility governing committee governance and accountability, and health system responsiveness as perceived by the patients' experiences. Data will be collected from a nationally representative sample involving 42 health facilities, 422 patient consultations, 54 health workers, and 42 health facility governing committees in seven regions from the seven zones of the Tanzanian mainland. The study is grounded in a conceptual framework centered on the Theory of Change and the Implementation Fidelity Framework. The study will utilise a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools (questionnaires, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and documentary review). The study will collect information related to knowledge, acceptability and practice of the programme, fidelity of implementation, structural qualities of maternal and child health services, accountability, governance, and patient perception of health system responsiveness. This evaluation study will generate evidence on both the process and impact of the DHFF programme implementation, and help to inform policy improvement. The study is expected to inform policy on the implementation of DHFF within decentralised health system government machinery, with particular regard to health system streng
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56437124424b4c1088930588df5478c0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581438370</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_56437124424b4c1088930588df5478c0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A581438370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAURSMEomXgA9ggS2xgkWLHduKwQKoKQ0eqhATt2nLslxlXiT3YDurwa_wcTqeUDkKRFev53Jv4vlcULwk-IUTU7yKp2pqUmIgSM4xL-qg4JqwRJeOYP36wPyqexXiNcVW1tHpaHFHcYEyxOC5-XTkDISbljHVrlDaA7LgdYASXVLLeId-jjzaATugc1JA2aKm0HWzaoaV1yulZltXIpoig72cwqzZ7Nu5ighFtIfQ-jJnO9g5dKvdTOaveI4Wcd6X2LgU_DGBQBxmEW0PVJwhotDe5PELaeINimswObYNPXvvhefGkV0OEF3fvRXG1_HR5dl5efPm8Oju9KDVvWSorzZSpaWNIUwnMSdtj3nV5ccFoTWnd5p_uGuhrhRVpGa-YZoJhjmvT1lzTRbHa-xqvruU22FGFnfTKytuCD2upQrJ6AMlrRhtSMVaxjmmChWgp5kKYnudeaJy9Puy9tlM3gtE55qCGA9PDE2c3cu1_yJpyRhnNBm_uDIL_PkFMcrRRwzAoB36KsiJNy5pqvtmieP0Peu2n4HJUmRK0wZyJ5i-1VvkC1vU-f1fPpvKUC8LoTGbq5D9UfgyMNvcPepvrB4K3B4K5x3CT1mqKUa6-fT1kyZ7VwccYoL_Pg2A5T7rcT7rMky7nSZdzDq8eBnmv-DPa9DeuB_i-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183705487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kapologwe, Ntuli A ; Kalolo, Albino ; Kibusi, Stephen M ; Chaula, Zainab ; Nswilla, Anna ; Teuscher, Thomas ; Aung, Kyaw ; Borghi, Josephine</creator><creatorcontrib>Kapologwe, Ntuli A ; Kalolo, Albino ; Kibusi, Stephen M ; Chaula, Zainab ; Nswilla, Anna ; Teuscher, Thomas ; Aung, Kyaw ; Borghi, Josephine</creatorcontrib><description>Globally, good health system performance has resulted from continuous reform, including adaptation of Decentralisation by Devolution policies, for example, the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Generally, the role of decentralisation in the health sector is to improve efficiency, to foster innovations and to improve quality, patient experience and accountability. However, such improvements have not been well realised in most low- and middle-income countries, with the main reason cited being the poor mechanism for disbursement of funds, which remain largely centralised. The introduction of the DHFF programme in Tanzania is expected to help improve the quality of health service delivery and increase service utilisation resulting in improved health system performance. This paper describes the protocol, which aims to evaluate the effects of DHFF on health system performance in Tanzania. An evaluation of the effect of the DHFF programme will be carried out as part of a nationwide programme rollout. A before and after non-controlled concurrent mixed methods design study will be employed to examine the effect of the DHFF programme implementation on the structural quality of maternal health, health facility governing committee governance and accountability, and health system responsiveness as perceived by the patients' experiences. Data will be collected from a nationally representative sample involving 42 health facilities, 422 patient consultations, 54 health workers, and 42 health facility governing committees in seven regions from the seven zones of the Tanzanian mainland. The study is grounded in a conceptual framework centered on the Theory of Change and the Implementation Fidelity Framework. The study will utilise a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools (questionnaires, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and documentary review). The study will collect information related to knowledge, acceptability and practice of the programme, fidelity of implementation, structural qualities of maternal and child health services, accountability, governance, and patient perception of health system responsiveness. This evaluation study will generate evidence on both the process and impact of the DHFF programme implementation, and help to inform policy improvement. The study is expected to inform policy on the implementation of DHFF within decentralised health system government machinery, with particular regard to health system strengthening through quality healthcare delivery. Health system responsiveness assessment, accountability and governance of Health Facility Government Committee should bring autonomy to lower levels and improve patient experiences. A major strength of the proposed study is the use of a mixed methods approach to obtain a more in-depth understanding of factors that may influence the implementation of the DHFF programme. This evaluation has the potential to generate robust data for evidence-based policy decisions in a low-income setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-4505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30700308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Autonomy ; Child health ; Childrens health ; Committees ; Control methods ; Councils ; Data collection ; Decentralization ; Devolution ; Direct Health Facility Financing ; Financing ; Governance ; Health aspects ; Health care facilities ; Health care industry ; Health care policy ; Health care reform ; Health facilities ; Health services ; Health surveys ; health system performance ; health system responsiveness ; Implementation ; implementation fidelity ; Income ; Innovations ; Machinery ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Methods ; Mixed methods research ; Patients ; Planning ; Politics ; primary healthcare facilities ; Public finance ; Qualitative analysis ; Quality ; Quality of care ; Quantitative analysis ; Questionnaires ; Reforms ; structural quality of healthcare ; Study Protocol ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Health research policy and systems, 2019-01, Vol.17 (1), p.11-11, Article 11</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0900-2937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6354343/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2183705487?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21366,21373,25731,27843,27901,27902,33588,33589,33962,33963,36989,36990,43709,43924,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30700308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kapologwe, Ntuli A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalolo, Albino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kibusi, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaula, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nswilla, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teuscher, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Kyaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghi, Josephine</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol</title><title>Health research policy and systems</title><addtitle>Health Res Policy Syst</addtitle><description>Globally, good health system performance has resulted from continuous reform, including adaptation of Decentralisation by Devolution policies, for example, the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Generally, the role of decentralisation in the health sector is to improve efficiency, to foster innovations and to improve quality, patient experience and accountability. However, such improvements have not been well realised in most low- and middle-income countries, with the main reason cited being the poor mechanism for disbursement of funds, which remain largely centralised. The introduction of the DHFF programme in Tanzania is expected to help improve the quality of health service delivery and increase service utilisation resulting in improved health system performance. This paper describes the protocol, which aims to evaluate the effects of DHFF on health system performance in Tanzania. An evaluation of the effect of the DHFF programme will be carried out as part of a nationwide programme rollout. A before and after non-controlled concurrent mixed methods design study will be employed to examine the effect of the DHFF programme implementation on the structural quality of maternal health, health facility governing committee governance and accountability, and health system responsiveness as perceived by the patients' experiences. Data will be collected from a nationally representative sample involving 42 health facilities, 422 patient consultations, 54 health workers, and 42 health facility governing committees in seven regions from the seven zones of the Tanzanian mainland. The study is grounded in a conceptual framework centered on the Theory of Change and the Implementation Fidelity Framework. The study will utilise a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools (questionnaires, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and documentary review). The study will collect information related to knowledge, acceptability and practice of the programme, fidelity of implementation, structural qualities of maternal and child health services, accountability, governance, and patient perception of health system responsiveness. This evaluation study will generate evidence on both the process and impact of the DHFF programme implementation, and help to inform policy improvement. The study is expected to inform policy on the implementation of DHFF within decentralised health system government machinery, with particular regard to health system strengthening through quality healthcare delivery. Health system responsiveness assessment, accountability and governance of Health Facility Government Committee should bring autonomy to lower levels and improve patient experiences. A major strength of the proposed study is the use of a mixed methods approach to obtain a more in-depth understanding of factors that may influence the implementation of the DHFF programme. This evaluation has the potential to generate robust data for evidence-based policy decisions in a low-income setting.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Child health</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Devolution</subject><subject>Direct Health Facility Financing</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>health system performance</subject><subject>health system responsiveness</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>implementation fidelity</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>primary healthcare facilities</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>structural quality of healthcare</subject><subject>Study Protocol</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>1478-4505</issn><issn>1478-4505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAURSMEomXgA9ggS2xgkWLHduKwQKoKQ0eqhATt2nLslxlXiT3YDurwa_wcTqeUDkKRFev53Jv4vlcULwk-IUTU7yKp2pqUmIgSM4xL-qg4JqwRJeOYP36wPyqexXiNcVW1tHpaHFHcYEyxOC5-XTkDISbljHVrlDaA7LgdYASXVLLeId-jjzaATugc1JA2aKm0HWzaoaV1yulZltXIpoig72cwqzZ7Nu5ighFtIfQ-jJnO9g5dKvdTOaveI4Wcd6X2LgU_DGBQBxmEW0PVJwhotDe5PELaeINimswObYNPXvvhefGkV0OEF3fvRXG1_HR5dl5efPm8Oju9KDVvWSorzZSpaWNIUwnMSdtj3nV5ccFoTWnd5p_uGuhrhRVpGa-YZoJhjmvT1lzTRbHa-xqvruU22FGFnfTKytuCD2upQrJ6AMlrRhtSMVaxjmmChWgp5kKYnudeaJy9Puy9tlM3gtE55qCGA9PDE2c3cu1_yJpyRhnNBm_uDIL_PkFMcrRRwzAoB36KsiJNy5pqvtmieP0Peu2n4HJUmRK0wZyJ5i-1VvkC1vU-f1fPpvKUC8LoTGbq5D9UfgyMNvcPepvrB4K3B4K5x3CT1mqKUa6-fT1kyZ7VwccYoL_Pg2A5T7rcT7rMky7nSZdzDq8eBnmv-DPa9DeuB_i-</recordid><startdate>20190130</startdate><enddate>20190130</enddate><creator>Kapologwe, Ntuli A</creator><creator>Kalolo, Albino</creator><creator>Kibusi, Stephen M</creator><creator>Chaula, Zainab</creator><creator>Nswilla, Anna</creator><creator>Teuscher, Thomas</creator><creator>Aung, Kyaw</creator><creator>Borghi, Josephine</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-2937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190130</creationdate><title>Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol</title><author>Kapologwe, Ntuli A ; Kalolo, Albino ; Kibusi, Stephen M ; Chaula, Zainab ; Nswilla, Anna ; Teuscher, Thomas ; Aung, Kyaw ; Borghi, Josephine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Child health</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Devolution</topic><topic>Direct Health Facility Financing</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>health system performance</topic><topic>health system responsiveness</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>implementation fidelity</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>primary healthcare facilities</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>structural quality of healthcare</topic><topic>Study Protocol</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kapologwe, Ntuli A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalolo, Albino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kibusi, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaula, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nswilla, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teuscher, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Kyaw</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghi, Josephine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Health research policy and systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kapologwe, Ntuli A</au><au>Kalolo, Albino</au><au>Kibusi, Stephen M</au><au>Chaula, Zainab</au><au>Nswilla, Anna</au><au>Teuscher, Thomas</au><au>Aung, Kyaw</au><au>Borghi, Josephine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol</atitle><jtitle>Health research policy and systems</jtitle><addtitle>Health Res Policy Syst</addtitle><date>2019-01-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>11-11</pages><artnum>11</artnum><issn>1478-4505</issn><eissn>1478-4505</eissn><abstract>Globally, good health system performance has resulted from continuous reform, including adaptation of Decentralisation by Devolution policies, for example, the Direct Health Facility Financing (DHFF). Generally, the role of decentralisation in the health sector is to improve efficiency, to foster innovations and to improve quality, patient experience and accountability. However, such improvements have not been well realised in most low- and middle-income countries, with the main reason cited being the poor mechanism for disbursement of funds, which remain largely centralised. The introduction of the DHFF programme in Tanzania is expected to help improve the quality of health service delivery and increase service utilisation resulting in improved health system performance. This paper describes the protocol, which aims to evaluate the effects of DHFF on health system performance in Tanzania. An evaluation of the effect of the DHFF programme will be carried out as part of a nationwide programme rollout. A before and after non-controlled concurrent mixed methods design study will be employed to examine the effect of the DHFF programme implementation on the structural quality of maternal health, health facility governing committee governance and accountability, and health system responsiveness as perceived by the patients' experiences. Data will be collected from a nationally representative sample involving 42 health facilities, 422 patient consultations, 54 health workers, and 42 health facility governing committees in seven regions from the seven zones of the Tanzanian mainland. The study is grounded in a conceptual framework centered on the Theory of Change and the Implementation Fidelity Framework. The study will utilise a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools (questionnaires, focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and documentary review). The study will collect information related to knowledge, acceptability and practice of the programme, fidelity of implementation, structural qualities of maternal and child health services, accountability, governance, and patient perception of health system responsiveness. This evaluation study will generate evidence on both the process and impact of the DHFF programme implementation, and help to inform policy improvement. The study is expected to inform policy on the implementation of DHFF within decentralised health system government machinery, with particular regard to health system strengthening through quality healthcare delivery. Health system responsiveness assessment, accountability and governance of Health Facility Government Committee should bring autonomy to lower levels and improve patient experiences. A major strength of the proposed study is the use of a mixed methods approach to obtain a more in-depth understanding of factors that may influence the implementation of the DHFF programme. This evaluation has the potential to generate robust data for evidence-based policy decisions in a low-income setting.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>30700308</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0900-2937</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-4505
ispartof Health research policy and systems, 2019-01, Vol.17 (1), p.11-11, Article 11
issn 1478-4505
1478-4505
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_56437124424b4c1088930588df5478c0
source Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; PubMed Central
subjects Accountability
Autonomy
Child health
Childrens health
Committees
Control methods
Councils
Data collection
Decentralization
Devolution
Direct Health Facility Financing
Financing
Governance
Health aspects
Health care facilities
Health care industry
Health care policy
Health care reform
Health facilities
Health services
Health surveys
health system performance
health system responsiveness
Implementation
implementation fidelity
Income
Innovations
Machinery
Maternal & child health
Medical personnel
Medical research
Methods
Mixed methods research
Patients
Planning
Politics
primary healthcare facilities
Public finance
Qualitative analysis
Quality
Quality of care
Quantitative analysis
Questionnaires
Reforms
structural quality of healthcare
Study Protocol
Workers
title Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20the%20implementation%20of%20Direct%20Health%20Facility%20Financing%20and%20its%20effect%20on%20health%20system%20performance%20in%20Tanzania:%20a%20non-controlled%20before%20and%20after%20mixed%20method%20study%20protocol&rft.jtitle=Health%20research%20policy%20and%20systems&rft.au=Kapologwe,%20Ntuli%20A&rft.date=2019-01-30&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=11-11&rft.artnum=11&rft.issn=1478-4505&rft.eissn=1478-4505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA581438370%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-2c4ad637d17280519f05bb05b584363369fecb7ef6a0a194524c4840506d965c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183705487&rft_id=info:pmid/30700308&rft_galeid=A581438370&rfr_iscdi=true