Loading…

Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte

This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ciência rural 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527
Main Authors: Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi, Cypriano, Lucas, Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 527
container_issue 2
container_start_page 522
container_title Ciência rural
container_volume 39
creator Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi
Cypriano, Lucas
Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate
description This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A212210805</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A212210805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj91Kw0AUhBdRsFafwQWvY_c32VyW4k-hoGDvw8nmJN3aZMtuUPo8vqhLW8SrgZnhm3MIuefskeuSzT4YZzIzqjCCsZIxloRJcUEmPC9MpnSZX5LJX-ma3MS4Ta1CKjUhP--bw-g7HJyl0DRudF9IIVIYKOxGDAMcndHTLvjvcUP3wfc-BZG6gdbBux0GajfOfuIQZ_MjwdPWnaGe2tT_xwIKPp4pPmCkDVKb1LoehzSDPW0DDJ0_JT6MeEuuWthFvDvrlKyfn9aL12z19rJczFdZUyqdFcaWaGpWl1rkeWuwyaXIlW54Y9OrhmmBBUCrBQhTl7U1nIMuWFEzWYNs5ZQsT9jGw7baB9dDOFQeXHU0fOgqCKOzO6x0rgEMKiNsqxRTpUEOdYFSp32T68R6OLE6SHU3tH4MYHsXbTUXXAjO0j3yFwcSilE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P&gt;0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P&gt;0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P&lt;0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</publisher><subject>aditivos fitogênicos ; antibiotic growth promoter ; antibiótico promotor de crescimento ; broiler chickens ; frangos de corte ; phytogenic feed additive</subject><ispartof>Ciência rural, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><title>Ciência rural</title><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P&gt;0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P&gt;0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P&lt;0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</description><subject>aditivos fitogênicos</subject><subject>antibiotic growth promoter</subject><subject>antibiótico promotor de crescimento</subject><subject>broiler chickens</subject><subject>frangos de corte</subject><subject>phytogenic feed additive</subject><issn>0103-8478</issn><issn>1678-4596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj91Kw0AUhBdRsFafwQWvY_c32VyW4k-hoGDvw8nmJN3aZMtuUPo8vqhLW8SrgZnhm3MIuefskeuSzT4YZzIzqjCCsZIxloRJcUEmPC9MpnSZX5LJX-ma3MS4Ta1CKjUhP--bw-g7HJyl0DRudF9IIVIYKOxGDAMcndHTLvjvcUP3wfc-BZG6gdbBux0GajfOfuIQZ_MjwdPWnaGe2tT_xwIKPp4pPmCkDVKb1LoehzSDPW0DDJ0_JT6MeEuuWthFvDvrlKyfn9aL12z19rJczFdZUyqdFcaWaGpWl1rkeWuwyaXIlW54Y9OrhmmBBUCrBQhTl7U1nIMuWFEzWYNs5ZQsT9jGw7baB9dDOFQeXHU0fOgqCKOzO6x0rgEMKiNsqxRTpUEOdYFSp32T68R6OLE6SHU3tH4MYHsXbTUXXAjO0j3yFwcSilE</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creator><creator>Cypriano, Lucas</creator><creator>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</general><scope>INF</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><author>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>aditivos fitogênicos</topic><topic>antibiotic growth promoter</topic><topic>antibiótico promotor de crescimento</topic><topic>broiler chickens</topic><topic>frangos de corte</topic><topic>phytogenic feed additive</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</au><au>Cypriano, Lucas</au><au>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</atitle><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>522-527</pages><issn>0103-8478</issn><eissn>1678-4596</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P&gt;0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P&gt;0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P&lt;0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</abstract><pub>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</pub><doi>10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0103-8478
ispartof Ciência rural, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527
issn 0103-8478
1678-4596
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865
source SciELO Brazil; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects aditivos fitogênicos
antibiotic growth promoter
antibiótico promotor de crescimento
broiler chickens
frangos de corte
phytogenic feed additive
title Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phytogenic%20additive%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20growth%20promoters%20in%20broiler%20chickens/Aditivo%20fitogenico%20como%20alternativa%20aos%20promotores%20de%20crescimento%20em%20frangos%20de%20corte&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20rural&rft.au=Scheuermann,%20Gerson%20Neudi&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=522-527&rft.issn=0103-8478&rft.eissn=1678-4596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA212210805%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A212210805&rfr_iscdi=true