Loading…
Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte
This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ciência rural 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; por |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 527 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | Ciência rural |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi Cypriano, Lucas Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate |
description | This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A212210805</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A212210805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj91Kw0AUhBdRsFafwQWvY_c32VyW4k-hoGDvw8nmJN3aZMtuUPo8vqhLW8SrgZnhm3MIuefskeuSzT4YZzIzqjCCsZIxloRJcUEmPC9MpnSZX5LJX-ma3MS4Ta1CKjUhP--bw-g7HJyl0DRudF9IIVIYKOxGDAMcndHTLvjvcUP3wfc-BZG6gdbBux0GajfOfuIQZ_MjwdPWnaGe2tT_xwIKPp4pPmCkDVKb1LoehzSDPW0DDJ0_JT6MeEuuWthFvDvrlKyfn9aL12z19rJczFdZUyqdFcaWaGpWl1rkeWuwyaXIlW54Y9OrhmmBBUCrBQhTl7U1nIMuWFEzWYNs5ZQsT9jGw7baB9dDOFQeXHU0fOgqCKOzO6x0rgEMKiNsqxRTpUEOdYFSp32T68R6OLE6SHU3tH4MYHsXbTUXXAjO0j3yFwcSilE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0103-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</publisher><subject>aditivos fitogênicos ; antibiotic growth promoter ; antibiótico promotor de crescimento ; broiler chickens ; frangos de corte ; phytogenic feed additive</subject><ispartof>Ciência rural, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><title>Ciência rural</title><description>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</description><subject>aditivos fitogênicos</subject><subject>antibiotic growth promoter</subject><subject>antibiótico promotor de crescimento</subject><subject>broiler chickens</subject><subject>frangos de corte</subject><subject>phytogenic feed additive</subject><issn>0103-8478</issn><issn>1678-4596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj91Kw0AUhBdRsFafwQWvY_c32VyW4k-hoGDvw8nmJN3aZMtuUPo8vqhLW8SrgZnhm3MIuefskeuSzT4YZzIzqjCCsZIxloRJcUEmPC9MpnSZX5LJX-ma3MS4Ta1CKjUhP--bw-g7HJyl0DRudF9IIVIYKOxGDAMcndHTLvjvcUP3wfc-BZG6gdbBux0GajfOfuIQZ_MjwdPWnaGe2tT_xwIKPp4pPmCkDVKb1LoehzSDPW0DDJ0_JT6MeEuuWthFvDvrlKyfn9aL12z19rJczFdZUyqdFcaWaGpWl1rkeWuwyaXIlW54Y9OrhmmBBUCrBQhTl7U1nIMuWFEzWYNs5ZQsT9jGw7baB9dDOFQeXHU0fOgqCKOzO6x0rgEMKiNsqxRTpUEOdYFSp32T68R6OLE6SHU3tH4MYHsXbTUXXAjO0j3yFwcSilE</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creator><creator>Cypriano, Lucas</creator><creator>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</general><scope>INF</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</title><author>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi ; Cypriano, Lucas ; Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>aditivos fitogênicos</topic><topic>antibiotic growth promoter</topic><topic>antibiótico promotor de crescimento</topic><topic>broiler chickens</topic><topic>frangos de corte</topic><topic>phytogenic feed additive</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cypriano, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheuermann, Gerson Neudi</au><au>Cypriano, Lucas</au><au>Gabbi, Alexandre Mossate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte</atitle><jtitle>Ciência rural</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>527</epage><pages>522-527</pages><issn>0103-8478</issn><eissn>1678-4596</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated a phytogenic feed additive for broiler chickens. A total of 1,632 broiler chicks were distributed into four treatments: negative control (without growth promoter); positive control (avilamycine, 10ppm + colistin, 15ppm); and two alternative treatments with 150ppm of phytogenic additive, one with a reduced Ca and P levels diet (PA-R1) and the other with lower energy, and amino acids, besides Ca and P (PA-R2). The trial was conducted with 12 replicates, each consisted of a pen with 34 birds. The alternative diets showed body weight intermediate to the two controls at 42 days, with no significant (P>0.05) treatment effect on feed conversion ratio. No treatment differences (P>0.05) on carcass yield and composition was observed. There was a tendency of abdominal fat lipids saturation, when the phytogenic additive was used, as possible consequence of a decreased level of soybean oil in the diets. A difference (P<0.001) on ingredient consumption profile was observed between the treatments. All together, this study showed a possibility to reduce the cost of total feed used to produce a broilers or a ton of body weight by the utilization of the tested phytogenic additive.</abstract><pub>Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</pub><doi>10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0103-8478 |
ispartof | Ciência rural, 2009-04, Vol.39 (2), p.522-527 |
issn | 0103-8478 1678-4596 |
language | eng ; por |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_565aa8e482cf440498e1ab7e35b0b865 |
source | SciELO Brazil; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | aditivos fitogênicos antibiotic growth promoter antibiótico promotor de crescimento broiler chickens frangos de corte phytogenic feed additive |
title | Phytogenic additive as an alternative to growth promoters in broiler chickens/Aditivo fitogenico como alternativa aos promotores de crescimento em frangos de corte |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phytogenic%20additive%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20growth%20promoters%20in%20broiler%20chickens/Aditivo%20fitogenico%20como%20alternativa%20aos%20promotores%20de%20crescimento%20em%20frangos%20de%20corte&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20rural&rft.au=Scheuermann,%20Gerson%20Neudi&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=527&rft.pages=522-527&rft.issn=0103-8478&rft.eissn=1678-4596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0103-84782009000200032&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA212210805%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d945-78c9e8b0b95266f8ed632645d1dc3448052e7aaf52a28b9bc811a5707b03ba3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A212210805&rfr_iscdi=true |