Immediate implant placement in anterior teeth with grafting material of autogenous tooth bone vs xenogenic bone

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the autogenous tooth bone and xenogenic bone grafted in immediate implant placement with bone defect. Thirty patients whose compromised anterior teeth need immediate implant placement were enrolled. Autogenous tooth bone made from the extracted tee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC oral health 2019-12, Vol.19 (1), p.266-266, Article 266
Main Authors: Wu, Dong, Zhou, Lin, Lin, Jichao, Chen, Jiang, Huang, Wenxiu, Chen, Yonghui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alveolar Bone Loss
Autogenous tooth
Bone graft
Bone grafts
Bone loss
Defects
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental implants
Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
Dentistry
Fistula
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immediate implant placement
Implant dentistry
Infections
Inflammation
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Prostheses
Retention
Skin & tissue grafts
Substance abuse treatment
Success
Surgeons
Surgery
Sutures
Systemic diseases
Teeth
Tooth Extraction
Tooth Socket
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
Xenografts
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the autogenous tooth bone and xenogenic bone grafted in immediate implant placement with bone defect. Thirty patients whose compromised anterior teeth need immediate implant placement were enrolled. Autogenous tooth bone made from the extracted teeth by chair-side or the xenogenic bone were used to repaired bone defect. Clinical examination, radiographic assessment about the horizontal bone change in the level of 0 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm below the implant neck and the marginal bone loss were made immediately, 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Questionnaire of the feelings about the surgery were made at the time of removing the sutures. All implants achieved the success criteria without any complications at the follow-up period. The percent of the horizontal bone change and the marginal bone loss at 6 and 12 months were almost the same between two groups (P > .05). The horizontal bone loss at the first or the latter 6 months was almost the same (P > .05). But the horizontal bone loss at the 6 mm level was less than the 0 mm and 3 mm levels at 6 and 12 months (P 
ISSN:1472-6831
1472-6831
DOI:10.1186/s12903-019-0970-7