Cognition and Neuropsychological Changes at Altitude-A Systematic Review of Literature

High-altitude (HA) exposure affects cognitive functions, but studies have found inconsistent results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HA exposure on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. A structural overview of the applied neuropsychological tests was provided wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain sciences 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.1736
Main Authors: Bliemsrieder, Kathrin, Weiss, Elisabeth Margarete, Fischer, Rainald, Brugger, Hermann, Sperner-Unterweger, Barbara, Hüfner, Katharina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acclimatization
Altitude
Aviation
Brain research
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
cognitive domains
Cold
Hypoxia
Memory
Mountain climbing
neuropsychological tests
Neuropsychology
PRISMA
Review
Sleep
Systematic review
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:High-altitude (HA) exposure affects cognitive functions, but studies have found inconsistent results. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of HA exposure on cognitive functions in healthy subjects. A structural overview of the applied neuropsychological tests was provided with a classification of superordinate cognitive domains. A literature search was performed using PubMed up to October 2021 according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligibility criteria included a healthy human cohort exposed to altitude in the field (at minimum 2440 m [8000 ft]) or in a hypoxic environment in a laboratory, and an assessment of cognitive domains. The literature search identified 52 studies (29 of these were field studies; altitude range: 2440 m-8848 m [8000-29,029 ft]). Researchers applied 112 different neuropsychological tests. Attentional capacity, concentration, and executive functions were the most frequently studied. In the laboratory, the ratio of altitude-induced impairments (64.7%) was twice as high compared to results showing no change or improved results (35.3%), but altitudes studied were similar in the chamber compared to field studies. In the field, the opposite results were found (66.4 % no change or improvements, 33.6% impairments). Since better acclimatization can be assumed in the field studies, the findings support the hypothesis that sufficient acclimatization has beneficial effects on cognitive functions at HA. However, it also becomes apparent that research in this area would benefit most if a consensus could be reached on a standardized framework of freely available neurocognitive tests.
ISSN:2076-3425
2076-3425
DOI:10.3390/brainsci12121736