Relatively stable pressure effects and time-increasing thermal contraction control Heber geothermal field deformation

Due to geological complexities and observational gaps, it is challenging to identify the governing physical processes of geothermal field deformation including ground subsidence and earthquakes. In the west and east regions of the Heber Geothermal Field (HGF), decade-long subsidence was occurring de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature communications 2024-06, Vol.15 (1), p.5159-14, Article 5159
Main Authors: Jiang, Guoyan, Barbour, Andrew J., Skoumal, Robert J., Materna, Kathryn, Taron, Joshua, Crandall-Bear, Aren
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
704/2151/241
704/2151/2809
704/4111
Deformation
Deformation effects
Earthquakes
Fault lines
Heat
Humanities and Social Sciences
Injection
multidisciplinary
Poroelasticity
Power plants
Pressure
Pressure effects
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Seismic activity
Seismicity
Siphoning
Subsidence
Temperature
Thermal contraction
Trends
Uplift
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Due to geological complexities and observational gaps, it is challenging to identify the governing physical processes of geothermal field deformation including ground subsidence and earthquakes. In the west and east regions of the Heber Geothermal Field (HGF), decade-long subsidence was occurring despite injection of heat-depleted brines, along with transient reversals between uplift and subsidence. These observed phenomena contradict current knowledge that injection leads to surface uplift. Here we show that high-yield production wells at the HGF center siphon fluid from surrounding regions, which can cause subsidence at low-rate injection locations. Moreover, the thermal contraction effect by cooling increases with time and eventually overwhelms the pressure effects of pressure fluctuation and poroelastic responses, which keep relatively stable during geothermal operations. The observed subsidence anomalies result from the siphoning effect and thermal contraction. We further demonstrate that thermal contraction dominates long-term trends of surface displacement and seismicity growth, while pressure effects drive near-instantaneous changes. Thermal contraction effect increases with time dominates the long-term deformation trend of the Heber geothermal field, while pressure effects of pressure fluctuation and poroelastic responses keep relatively stable and drive short-term changes.
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-49363-1