Loading…

Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation

Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global ecology and conservation 2014-12, Vol.2, p.255-266
Main Authors: Cypher, B.L., Madrid, A.Y., Van Horn Job, C.L., Kelly, E.C., Harrison, S.W.R., Westall, T.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3
container_end_page 266
container_issue
container_start_page 255
container_title Global ecology and conservation
container_volume 2
creator Cypher, B.L.
Madrid, A.Y.
Van Horn Job, C.L.
Kelly, E.C.
Harrison, S.W.R.
Westall, T.L.
description Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralis
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF3TjH7A7sizZ7q6EPgIp3bRrocc4yDiRkZyS_H1tp5Su5nLmchaXkHsKGQUqHtpsh8b4LAdajCQDoFdkkTNO07qqi-t_-ZasYmxhbIi8pBVbEPN-7AaX9r4_dmpw_pAYv-9VcHGMvkkCRn8MBhM89Z13w6Wjz4mLnTrYpPEnjI_JZt93zszPOLIwWg4Rw_dM7shNo7qIq9-7JF8vz5_rt3T78bpZP21TwwQMaa6rwiATLC9KaGhtatSC58jLBksKvMY6t4VVyIGDMAgW1VgwlAvgwmq2JJuL13rVyj64vQpn6ZWTM_BhJ1UYnOlQ8pIbrrW2QkNhWFHpyhYNt4yqioKeXOziMsHHGLD581GQ0-yylfPscpp9guOo7AeKYnni</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Cypher, B.L. ; Madrid, A.Y. ; Van Horn Job, C.L. ; Kelly, E.C. ; Harrison, S.W.R. ; Westall, T.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cypher, B.L. ; Madrid, A.Y. ; Van Horn Job, C.L. ; Kelly, E.C. ; Harrison, S.W.R. ; Westall, T.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralis</description><identifier>ISSN: 2351-9894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2351-9894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><ispartof>Global ecology and conservation, 2014-12, Vol.2, p.255-266</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cypher, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, A.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Horn Job, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, S.W.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westall, T.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation</title><title>Global ecology and conservation</title><description>Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralis</description><issn>2351-9894</issn><issn>2351-9894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNF3TjH7A7sizZ7q6EPgIp3bRrocc4yDiRkZyS_H1tp5Su5nLmchaXkHsKGQUqHtpsh8b4LAdajCQDoFdkkTNO07qqi-t_-ZasYmxhbIi8pBVbEPN-7AaX9r4_dmpw_pAYv-9VcHGMvkkCRn8MBhM89Z13w6Wjz4mLnTrYpPEnjI_JZt93zszPOLIwWg4Rw_dM7shNo7qIq9-7JF8vz5_rt3T78bpZP21TwwQMaa6rwiATLC9KaGhtatSC58jLBksKvMY6t4VVyIGDMAgW1VgwlAvgwmq2JJuL13rVyj64vQpn6ZWTM_BhJ1UYnOlQ8pIbrrW2QkNhWFHpyhYNt4yqioKeXOziMsHHGLD581GQ0-yylfPscpp9guOo7AeKYnni</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Cypher, B.L.</creator><creator>Madrid, A.Y.</creator><creator>Van Horn Job, C.L.</creator><creator>Kelly, E.C.</creator><creator>Harrison, S.W.R.</creator><creator>Westall, T.L.</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation</title><author>Cypher, B.L. ; Madrid, A.Y. ; Van Horn Job, C.L. ; Kelly, E.C. ; Harrison, S.W.R. ; Westall, T.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cypher, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madrid, A.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Horn Job, C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, E.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, S.W.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westall, T.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cypher, B.L.</au><au>Madrid, A.Y.</au><au>Van Horn Job, C.L.</au><au>Kelly, E.C.</au><au>Harrison, S.W.R.</au><au>Westall, T.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and conservation</jtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>255</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>255-266</pages><issn>2351-9894</issn><eissn>2351-9894</eissn><abstract>Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralis</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2351-9894
ispartof Global ecology and conservation, 2014-12, Vol.2, p.255-266
issn 2351-9894
2351-9894
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
title Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A53%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-population%20comparison%20of%20resource%20exploitation%20by%20island%20foxes:%20Implications%20for%20conservation&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Cypher,%20B.L.&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=255-266&rft.issn=2351-9894&rft.eissn=2351-9894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-2b84ce3632470f19c9eb652e57fe71059e92d4dae50506ce0deab65c156056db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true