Consumer Acceptance of Meat from Animals Reared on Insect Meal as Feed

• Published in: Animals (Basel) 2020-07, Vol.10 (8), p.1312
• Main Authors: Szendrő, Katalin, Nagy, Mónika Zita, Tóth, Katalin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: acceptance; Age; Animal feed; Animal protein; Animal welfare; Animals; Aversion; Climate change; consumer; Consumer preferences; Consumers; Consumption; Evaluation; Family income; farmed animals; Feeds; Fish meal; Food sources; Genetic modification; Global warming; Higher education; insect; Insects; Meat; Poultry; Proteins; Questionnaires; Secondary schools; Social aspects; Soybeans; Swine; Variables
• ISSN: 2076-2615; 2076-2615
• DOI: 10.3390/ani10081312

Insect protein production requires much less land, feed, and water, and thus has a much smaller ecological footprint than animal protein production, which is important for reducing global warming. Poultry, pigs, and fish consume insects in nature, so insect meal could be a good substitute for soybean and fishmeal as a protein source in diets. The aim of this study was to examine consumer opinion on meat that originated from animals whose diet contained insect meal. The study was conducted in Hungary in 2020 (N = 414). On a scale of 1–7, respondents gave much lower scores (3.96) to this product than that which originated from a free-range system (5.11; p < 0.001). Male, more highly educated, and 30–39 year-old respondents gave significantly higher scores than other groups. The most important factor in accepting insect meal in animal feed was “no risk”, while the least important factor was “replacement of Genetically Modified (GM) soybeans”. Since free-range animals also consume insects, the difference in the attitude of respondents was based on their aversion to insects, while accepting free-range as the best animal welfare system. Thus, more emphasis should be placed on the benefits of insect meal in animal feed in order to bring about awareness and acceptance.