A Systematic Methodology to Evaluate Prediction Models for Driving Style Classification

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2020-03, Vol.20 (6), p.1692
• Main Authors: Silva, Iván, Eugenio Naranjo, José
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control; Artificial intelligence; Automobile Driving - standards; Behavior - classification; Biobehavioral Sciences - classification; Classification; Data collection; Datasets; driving safety; driving styles; driving styles classification; driving styles methodology; Forecasting - methods; Fuzzy logic; Geographic Information Systems - instrumentation; Geographic Information Systems - standards; Global positioning systems; GPS; Humans; intelligent vehicle control; Interpersonal Relations; Learning theory; Machine Learning; Methodology; Model accuracy; Neural Networks, Computer; Prediction models; Sensors; Statistical tests; Support Vector Machine; Support vector machines; Traffic accidents & safety; Traffic flow
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s20061692

Identifying driving styles using classification models with in-vehicle data can provide automated feedback to drivers on their driving behavior, particularly if they are driving safely. Although several classification models have been developed for this purpose, there is no consensus on which classifier performs better at identifying driving styles. Therefore, more research is needed to evaluate classification models by comparing performance metrics. In this paper, a data-driven machine-learning methodology for classifying driving styles is introduced. This methodology is grounded in well-established machine-learning (ML) methods and literature related to driving-styles research. The methodology is illustrated through a study involving data collected from 50 drivers from two different cities in a naturalistic setting. Five features were extracted from the raw data. Fifteen experts were involved in the data labeling to derive the ground truth of the dataset. The dataset fed five different models (Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), fuzzy logic, k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Random Forests (RF)). These models were evaluated in terms of a set of performance metrics and statistical tests. The experimental results from performance metrics showed that SVM outperformed the other four models, achieving an average accuracy of 0.96, F1-Score of 0.9595, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9730, and Kappa of 0.9375. In addition, Wilcoxon tests indicated that ANN predicts differently to the other four models. These promising results demonstrate that the proposed methodology may support researchers in making informed decisions about which ML model performs better for driving-styles classification.