Loading…

Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance

The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary sciences 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39
Main Authors: Asadi, Behnam, Seyedasgari, Fahimeh, Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj, Yarmohammadi, Mehdi, Ebadi, Reza, Kim, Ellen, Barin, Abbas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Veterinary sciences
container_volume 10
creator Asadi, Behnam
Seyedasgari, Fahimeh
Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj
Yarmohammadi, Mehdi
Ebadi, Reza
Kim, Ellen
Barin, Abbas
description The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/vetsci10010039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752262540</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A752262540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvQK0dkiQuHpuza64_lgFTCV6QiEKFny2uPNw67drB3g_pX-LU4pJQG25LHM8-8tkdTFE-r8oKQpny5gzFpV5VlXqR5UJxiUrI5J6J6eM8-Kc5S2pSZIjWmvHpcnBDGWJNTTotfyxR6NYJBb5QeITqFbAwDGteArvdnFCxaqAH6hH66cY3eOmshgh_RV9jGYCY9uh3ss793MUzepFfoEq3Gydyg4NFKDdve-Q59gnEdTOhDd3OOvkTYqR68hnOkvEGLjDiterRynXc2mzn0pHhkVZ_g7HafFdfv331bfJxfff6wXFxezTXFZJwbTZQAxmtWQoOhZarkoDRrBRG8rglvTFVTrSvaGtEQoyxT1ECrmSZ1aw2ZFcuDrglqI7fRDSreyKCc_OMIsZMqjk73ICm3lFOLa4CmFoy0DLNGaSO4EWQ_ZsXrg9Z2agcwOtcpqv5I9Dji3Vp2YScbwWjFqyzw4lYghh8TpFEOLmnoe-UhTElizgTGtBY4o8__Qzdhij6Xak9xLERDaaYuDlSXCy6dtyHfq_M0MDgdPFiX_ZecYsyybvkvQceQUgR79_qqlPu2k8dtlxOe3f_zHf63ychvl4TWEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767288955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><creator>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</creator><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p &lt; 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring &lt; 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p &gt; 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p &lt; 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10010039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36669039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Camelidae ; Catheters ; Cervix ; Clinical significance ; Embryo transfer ; Experiments ; Infections ; Methods ; microbiota ; Microorganisms ; pregnancy ; Reproductive technologies ; Sampling ; Ultrasonic imaging ; uterine discharge ; Uterus ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Veterinary sciences, 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767288955/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767288955?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><title>Veterinary sciences</title><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p &lt; 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring &lt; 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p &gt; 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p &lt; 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Camelidae</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Embryo transfer</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>uterine discharge</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>2306-7381</issn><issn>2306-7381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvQK0dkiQuHpuza64_lgFTCV6QiEKFny2uPNw67drB3g_pX-LU4pJQG25LHM8-8tkdTFE-r8oKQpny5gzFpV5VlXqR5UJxiUrI5J6J6eM8-Kc5S2pSZIjWmvHpcnBDGWJNTTotfyxR6NYJBb5QeITqFbAwDGteArvdnFCxaqAH6hH66cY3eOmshgh_RV9jGYCY9uh3ss793MUzepFfoEq3Gydyg4NFKDdve-Q59gnEdTOhDd3OOvkTYqR68hnOkvEGLjDiterRynXc2mzn0pHhkVZ_g7HafFdfv331bfJxfff6wXFxezTXFZJwbTZQAxmtWQoOhZarkoDRrBRG8rglvTFVTrSvaGtEQoyxT1ECrmSZ1aw2ZFcuDrglqI7fRDSreyKCc_OMIsZMqjk73ICm3lFOLa4CmFoy0DLNGaSO4EWQ_ZsXrg9Z2agcwOtcpqv5I9Dji3Vp2YScbwWjFqyzw4lYghh8TpFEOLmnoe-UhTElizgTGtBY4o8__Qzdhij6Xak9xLERDaaYuDlSXCy6dtyHfq_M0MDgdPFiX_ZecYsyybvkvQceQUgR79_qqlPu2k8dtlxOe3f_zHf63ychvl4TWEg</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Asadi, Behnam</creator><creator>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creator><creator>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creator><creator>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creator><creator>Ebadi, Reza</creator><creator>Kim, Ellen</creator><creator>Barin, Abbas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><author>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Camelidae</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Embryo transfer</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>uterine discharge</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asadi, Behnam</au><au>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</au><au>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</au><au>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</au><au>Ebadi, Reza</au><au>Kim, Ellen</au><au>Barin, Abbas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><pages>39-</pages><issn>2306-7381</issn><eissn>2306-7381</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p &lt; 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring &lt; 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p &gt; 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p &lt; 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36669039</pmid><doi>10.3390/vetsci10010039</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2306-7381
ispartof Veterinary sciences, 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39
issn 2306-7381
2306-7381
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)
subjects Bacteria
Camelidae
Catheters
Cervix
Clinical significance
Embryo transfer
Experiments
Infections
Methods
microbiota
Microorganisms
pregnancy
Reproductive technologies
Sampling
Ultrasonic imaging
uterine discharge
Uterus
Vagina
title Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isolated%20Bacteria%20from%20the%20Uteri%20of%20Camels%20with%20Different%20Reproductive%20Backgrounds:%20A%20Study%20on%20Sampling%20Methodology,%20Prevalence,%20and%20Clinical%20Significance&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20sciences&rft.au=Asadi,%20Behnam&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.pages=39-&rft.issn=2306-7381&rft.eissn=2306-7381&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/vetsci10010039&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA752262540%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767288955&rft_id=info:pmid/36669039&rft_galeid=A752262540&rfr_iscdi=true