Loading…
Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance
The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary sciences 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Veterinary sciences |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Asadi, Behnam Seyedasgari, Fahimeh Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj Yarmohammadi, Mehdi Ebadi, Reza Kim, Ellen Barin, Abbas |
description | The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/vetsci10010039 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A752262540</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A752262540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvQK0dkiQuHpuza64_lgFTCV6QiEKFny2uPNw67drB3g_pX-LU4pJQG25LHM8-8tkdTFE-r8oKQpny5gzFpV5VlXqR5UJxiUrI5J6J6eM8-Kc5S2pSZIjWmvHpcnBDGWJNTTotfyxR6NYJBb5QeITqFbAwDGteArvdnFCxaqAH6hH66cY3eOmshgh_RV9jGYCY9uh3ss793MUzepFfoEq3Gydyg4NFKDdve-Q59gnEdTOhDd3OOvkTYqR68hnOkvEGLjDiterRynXc2mzn0pHhkVZ_g7HafFdfv331bfJxfff6wXFxezTXFZJwbTZQAxmtWQoOhZarkoDRrBRG8rglvTFVTrSvaGtEQoyxT1ECrmSZ1aw2ZFcuDrglqI7fRDSreyKCc_OMIsZMqjk73ICm3lFOLa4CmFoy0DLNGaSO4EWQ_ZsXrg9Z2agcwOtcpqv5I9Dji3Vp2YScbwWjFqyzw4lYghh8TpFEOLmnoe-UhTElizgTGtBY4o8__Qzdhij6Xak9xLERDaaYuDlSXCy6dtyHfq_M0MDgdPFiX_ZecYsyybvkvQceQUgR79_qqlPu2k8dtlxOe3f_zHf63ychvl4TWEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2767288955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><creator>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</creator><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-7381</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10010039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36669039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Camelidae ; Catheters ; Cervix ; Clinical significance ; Embryo transfer ; Experiments ; Infections ; Methods ; microbiota ; Microorganisms ; pregnancy ; Reproductive technologies ; Sampling ; Ultrasonic imaging ; uterine discharge ; Uterus ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Veterinary sciences, 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767288955/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2767288955?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36669039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><title>Veterinary sciences</title><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Camelidae</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Embryo transfer</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>uterine discharge</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>2306-7381</issn><issn>2306-7381</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvQK0dkiQuHpuza64_lgFTCV6QiEKFny2uPNw67drB3g_pX-LU4pJQG25LHM8-8tkdTFE-r8oKQpny5gzFpV5VlXqR5UJxiUrI5J6J6eM8-Kc5S2pSZIjWmvHpcnBDGWJNTTotfyxR6NYJBb5QeITqFbAwDGteArvdnFCxaqAH6hH66cY3eOmshgh_RV9jGYCY9uh3ss793MUzepFfoEq3Gydyg4NFKDdve-Q59gnEdTOhDd3OOvkTYqR68hnOkvEGLjDiterRynXc2mzn0pHhkVZ_g7HafFdfv331bfJxfff6wXFxezTXFZJwbTZQAxmtWQoOhZarkoDRrBRG8rglvTFVTrSvaGtEQoyxT1ECrmSZ1aw2ZFcuDrglqI7fRDSreyKCc_OMIsZMqjk73ICm3lFOLa4CmFoy0DLNGaSO4EWQ_ZsXrg9Z2agcwOtcpqv5I9Dji3Vp2YScbwWjFqyzw4lYghh8TpFEOLmnoe-UhTElizgTGtBY4o8__Qzdhij6Xak9xLERDaaYuDlSXCy6dtyHfq_M0MDgdPFiX_ZecYsyybvkvQceQUgR79_qqlPu2k8dtlxOe3f_zHf63ychvl4TWEg</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Asadi, Behnam</creator><creator>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creator><creator>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creator><creator>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creator><creator>Ebadi, Reza</creator><creator>Kim, Ellen</creator><creator>Barin, Abbas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</title><author>Asadi, Behnam ; Seyedasgari, Fahimeh ; Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj ; Yarmohammadi, Mehdi ; Ebadi, Reza ; Kim, Ellen ; Barin, Abbas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Camelidae</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Embryo transfer</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>uterine discharge</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asadi, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebadi, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barin, Abbas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asadi, Behnam</au><au>Seyedasgari, Fahimeh</au><au>Ashrafi Tamai, Iradj</au><au>Yarmohammadi, Mehdi</au><au>Ebadi, Reza</au><au>Kim, Ellen</au><au>Barin, Abbas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><pages>39-</pages><issn>2306-7381</issn><eissn>2306-7381</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to comparatively identify the common bacterial isolates from the uteri of camels coming from different reproductive backgrounds after standardizing the sampling method and to investigate the association of clinically measurable parameters with uterine colonization by these isolates. The uterine samples from 856 dromedary camels yielded a total of 17 different bacterial species with a higher proportion of sub-fertile camel uteri being colonized by bacteria (66.6%) as compared to nulliparous, recently calved, and those with unknown reproductive history combined (44.2%; p < 0.05). Camels with body condition scoring < 3 and those with a consistently echogenic appearance of the uterine lumen by sonography were more likely to be positive on uterine culture, while the presence of pus in uterine discharge was not associated with the odds of bacterial isolation (p > 0.05). While certain strains were more likely to be obtained from the uteri of the sub-fertile group (p < 0.05), embryo transfer to camels with a positive uterine culture in the absence of other gross reproductive pathologies did not necessarily affect the overall pregnancy rate compared to recipients with a negative uterine culture (p > 0.05). In conclusion, a relatively high bacterial load can be identified from the uteri of both sub-fertile and normal dromedary camels, with a higher frequency among the former. The uterine ultrasonography and evaluation of the body condition score can help in identifying the camels in which uterus is contaminated by bacteria.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>36669039</pmid><doi>10.3390/vetsci10010039</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5825-6920</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2306-7381 |
ispartof | Veterinary sciences, 2023-01, Vol.10 (1), p.39 |
issn | 2306-7381 2306-7381 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_57f575f24ee94863b6269acd87d83333 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫) |
subjects | Bacteria Camelidae Catheters Cervix Clinical significance Embryo transfer Experiments Infections Methods microbiota Microorganisms pregnancy Reproductive technologies Sampling Ultrasonic imaging uterine discharge Uterus Vagina |
title | Isolated Bacteria from the Uteri of Camels with Different Reproductive Backgrounds: A Study on Sampling Methodology, Prevalence, and Clinical Significance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isolated%20Bacteria%20from%20the%20Uteri%20of%20Camels%20with%20Different%20Reproductive%20Backgrounds:%20A%20Study%20on%20Sampling%20Methodology,%20Prevalence,%20and%20Clinical%20Significance&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20sciences&rft.au=Asadi,%20Behnam&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.pages=39-&rft.issn=2306-7381&rft.eissn=2306-7381&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/vetsci10010039&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA752262540%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-dc3a8e67460e92eb6a07eac6b838744379d145cc15bd893daf6a5debc6c34bfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2767288955&rft_id=info:pmid/36669039&rft_galeid=A752262540&rfr_iscdi=true |