Loading…

Metabolic tumor parameters complement clinicopathological factors in prognosticating advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Objective(s):Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asia oceania journal of nuclear medicine and biology 2023-01, Vol.11 (2), p.111-121
Main Authors: Mohite, Ashish, Rangarajan, Venkatesh, Goda, Jayant, Chugh, Swati, Agrawal, Archi, Sengar, Manju
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective(s):Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma has a higher probability of relapse and recurrence. Classical clinicopathological parameters including the International Prognostic Score (IPS) have not been reliable in predicting prognosis or tailoring treatment. Since FDG PET/CT is the standard of care in staging Hodgkin Lymphoma, this study attempted to evaluate the clinical utility of baseline metabolic tumor parameters in a cohort of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III and IV). Methods: Histology-proven advanced Hodgkin Patients presenting to our institute between 2012-2016 and treated with chemo-radiotherapy (ABVD / AEVD) were followed up till 2019. Quantitative PET/CT and clinicopathological parameters were used to estimate the Event Free Survival (EFS) in 100 patients. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to compare the survival times of prognostic factors.Results:At a median follow-up of 48.83 months (IQR:33.31-63.05 months), the five-year-EFS was 81%. Of the 100 patients, 16 had relapsed (16%) and none died at the last follow-up. On Univariate analysis, among non-PET parameters bulky disease (P=0.03) and B-symptoms (P=0.04) were significant while among PET/CT parameters SUVmax (p=0.001), SUVmean (P=0.002), WBMTV2.5 (P
ISSN:2322-5718
2322-5726
DOI:10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.69260.1482