Loading…

Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals

Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:iScience 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093
Main Authors: van der Kooi, Casper J., Reuvers, Lora, Spaethe, Johannes
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73
container_end_page 107093
container_issue 7
container_start_page 107093
container_title iScience
container_volume 26
creator van der Kooi, Casper J.
Reuvers, Lora
Spaethe, Johannes
description Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions. [Display omitted] Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589004223011707</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2839253979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5fSUsX6D_hQ9rEPvWt-bwIFKVKrIPSlPodsMrnm2Etssif433euq6IvhcAkk-98kplv151RsqaEqi_bdWo-rRlhHBMDMfxNd8ykNitCBHv7Yn_Unba2JYQwXMKo990RHwRTXAzH3flVydDmh899hSm5MU3pcHA59CnHUnduTiX3vuQZ8tyX2MepVDf1LW2ym9qH7l3EAKeP8aS7vfz-6-JqdfPzx_XFt5uVl4zNq-A4d9zEYKKnwWvpwqgc5SApkzQqUFQJESmRREnUCpDSjUYEgvU0DPyku164obitvatp5-qDLS7Zf4lSN9bVOfkJrNRCayUGjWgx6lGLoEepAbwcRgUBWecL624_7iB4bAw7egV9fZPTb7sp95YSzgwdFBI-PRJq-bPH-dkdugHT5DKUfbNMc8MkN4NBKVukvpbWKsTndyixByft1h6ctAcn7eIkFn18-cPnkiffUPB1EQDO_D5BtYiA7CGkCn7GoaT_8f8CzGmuug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839253979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions. [Display omitted] Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37426347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Plant Biology ; Plant ecology ; Plant evolution ; Review</subject><ispartof>iScience, 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329176/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223011707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuvers, Lora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><title>iScience</title><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><description>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions. [Display omitted] Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</description><subject>Plant Biology</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant evolution</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2589-0042</issn><issn>2589-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5fSUsX6D_hQ9rEPvWt-bwIFKVKrIPSlPodsMrnm2Etssif433euq6IvhcAkk-98kplv151RsqaEqi_bdWo-rRlhHBMDMfxNd8ykNitCBHv7Yn_Unba2JYQwXMKo990RHwRTXAzH3flVydDmh899hSm5MU3pcHA59CnHUnduTiX3vuQZ8tyX2MepVDf1LW2ym9qH7l3EAKeP8aS7vfz-6-JqdfPzx_XFt5uVl4zNq-A4d9zEYKKnwWvpwqgc5SApkzQqUFQJESmRREnUCpDSjUYEgvU0DPyku164obitvatp5-qDLS7Zf4lSN9bVOfkJrNRCayUGjWgx6lGLoEepAbwcRgUBWecL624_7iB4bAw7egV9fZPTb7sp95YSzgwdFBI-PRJq-bPH-dkdugHT5DKUfbNMc8MkN4NBKVukvpbWKsTndyixByft1h6ctAcn7eIkFn18-cPnkiffUPB1EQDO_D5BtYiA7CGkCn7GoaT_8f8CzGmuug</recordid><startdate>20230721</startdate><enddate>20230721</enddate><creator>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creator><creator>Reuvers, Lora</creator><creator>Spaethe, Johannes</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230721</creationdate><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><author>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Plant Biology</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant evolution</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuvers, Lora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>iScience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Kooi, Casper J.</au><au>Reuvers, Lora</au><au>Spaethe, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</atitle><jtitle>iScience</jtitle><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><date>2023-07-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>107093</spage><epage>107093</epage><pages>107093-107093</pages><artnum>107093</artnum><issn>2589-0042</issn><eissn>2589-0042</eissn><abstract>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions. [Display omitted] Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37426347</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2589-0042
ispartof iScience, 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093
issn 2589-0042
2589-0042
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed
source ScienceDirect; PubMed Central
subjects Plant Biology
Plant ecology
Plant evolution
Review
title Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Honesty,%20reliability,%20and%20information%20content%20of%20floral%20signals&rft.jtitle=iScience&rft.au=van%20der%20Kooi,%20Casper%20J.&rft.date=2023-07-21&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=107093&rft.epage=107093&rft.pages=107093-107093&rft.artnum=107093&rft.issn=2589-0042&rft.eissn=2589-0042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2839253979%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839253979&rft_id=info:pmid/37426347&rfr_iscdi=true