Loading…
Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals
Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plan...
Saved in:
Published in: | iScience 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73 |
container_end_page | 107093 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 107093 |
container_title | iScience |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | van der Kooi, Casper J. Reuvers, Lora Spaethe, Johannes |
description | Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions.
[Display omitted]
Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589004223011707</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2839253979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5fSUsX6D_hQ9rEPvWt-bwIFKVKrIPSlPodsMrnm2Etssif433euq6IvhcAkk-98kplv151RsqaEqi_bdWo-rRlhHBMDMfxNd8ykNitCBHv7Yn_Unba2JYQwXMKo990RHwRTXAzH3flVydDmh899hSm5MU3pcHA59CnHUnduTiX3vuQZ8tyX2MepVDf1LW2ym9qH7l3EAKeP8aS7vfz-6-JqdfPzx_XFt5uVl4zNq-A4d9zEYKKnwWvpwqgc5SApkzQqUFQJESmRREnUCpDSjUYEgvU0DPyku164obitvatp5-qDLS7Zf4lSN9bVOfkJrNRCayUGjWgx6lGLoEepAbwcRgUBWecL624_7iB4bAw7egV9fZPTb7sp95YSzgwdFBI-PRJq-bPH-dkdugHT5DKUfbNMc8MkN4NBKVukvpbWKsTndyixByft1h6ctAcn7eIkFn18-cPnkiffUPB1EQDO_D5BtYiA7CGkCn7GoaT_8f8CzGmuug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2839253979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions.
[Display omitted]
Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37426347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Plant Biology ; Plant ecology ; Plant evolution ; Review</subject><ispartof>iScience, 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329176/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004223011707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37426347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuvers, Lora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><title>iScience</title><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><description>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions.
[Display omitted]
Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</description><subject>Plant Biology</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant evolution</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2589-0042</issn><issn>2589-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9LHDEQx5fSUsX6D_hQ9rEPvWt-bwIFKVKrIPSlPodsMrnm2Etssif433euq6IvhcAkk-98kplv151RsqaEqi_bdWo-rRlhHBMDMfxNd8ykNitCBHv7Yn_Unba2JYQwXMKo990RHwRTXAzH3flVydDmh899hSm5MU3pcHA59CnHUnduTiX3vuQZ8tyX2MepVDf1LW2ym9qH7l3EAKeP8aS7vfz-6-JqdfPzx_XFt5uVl4zNq-A4d9zEYKKnwWvpwqgc5SApkzQqUFQJESmRREnUCpDSjUYEgvU0DPyku164obitvatp5-qDLS7Zf4lSN9bVOfkJrNRCayUGjWgx6lGLoEepAbwcRgUBWecL624_7iB4bAw7egV9fZPTb7sp95YSzgwdFBI-PRJq-bPH-dkdugHT5DKUfbNMc8MkN4NBKVukvpbWKsTndyixByft1h6ctAcn7eIkFn18-cPnkiffUPB1EQDO_D5BtYiA7CGkCn7GoaT_8f8CzGmuug</recordid><startdate>20230721</startdate><enddate>20230721</enddate><creator>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creator><creator>Reuvers, Lora</creator><creator>Spaethe, Johannes</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230721</creationdate><title>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</title><author>van der Kooi, Casper J. ; Reuvers, Lora ; Spaethe, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Plant Biology</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant evolution</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Kooi, Casper J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuvers, Lora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaethe, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>iScience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Kooi, Casper J.</au><au>Reuvers, Lora</au><au>Spaethe, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals</atitle><jtitle>iScience</jtitle><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><date>2023-07-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>107093</spage><epage>107093</epage><pages>107093-107093</pages><artnum>107093</artnum><issn>2589-0042</issn><eissn>2589-0042</eissn><abstract>Plants advertise their presence by displaying attractive flowers, which pollinators use to locate a floral reward. Understanding how floral traits scale with reward status lies at the heart of pollination biology, because it connects the different interests of plants and pollinators. Studies on plant phenotype-reward associations often use different terms and concepts, which limits developing a broader synthesis. Here, we present a framework with definitions of the key aspects of plant phenotype-reward associations and provide measures to quantify them across different species and studies. We first distinguish between cues and signals, which are often used interchangeably, but have different meanings and are subject to different selective pressures. We then define honesty, reliability, and information content of floral cues/signals and provide ways to quantify them. Finally, we discuss the ecological and evolutionary factors that determine flower phenotype-reward associations, how context-dependent and temporally variable they are, and highlight promising research directions.
[Display omitted]
Plant Biology ; Plant ecology; Plant evolution</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37426347</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2589-0042 |
ispartof | iScience, 2023-07, Vol.26 (7), p.107093-107093, Article 107093 |
issn | 2589-0042 2589-0042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5848864781254b8b84d8b58eec57b6ed |
source | ScienceDirect; PubMed Central |
subjects | Plant Biology Plant ecology Plant evolution Review |
title | Honesty, reliability, and information content of floral signals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A00%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Honesty,%20reliability,%20and%20information%20content%20of%20floral%20signals&rft.jtitle=iScience&rft.au=van%20der%20Kooi,%20Casper%20J.&rft.date=2023-07-21&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=107093&rft.epage=107093&rft.pages=107093-107093&rft.artnum=107093&rft.issn=2589-0042&rft.eissn=2589-0042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107093&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2839253979%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c522t-da33a39fd9fc1dc85adb6a13e51251f6e61644f105065a334e55ab94d0c521d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2839253979&rft_id=info:pmid/37426347&rfr_iscdi=true |