Topographic numerosity maps cover subitizing and estimation ranges

• Published in: Nature communications 2021-06, Vol.12 (1), p.3374-3374, Article 3374
• Main Authors: Cai, Yuxuan, Hofstetter, Shir, van Dijk, Jelle, Zuiderbaan, Wietske, van der Zwaag, Wietske, Harvey, Ben M., Dumoulin, Serge O.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 59/36; 59/57; 631/378/2613/2614; 631/378/2649/1723; Adult; Brain; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Brain - physiology; Brain mapping; Brain Mapping - methods; Female; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Hemodynamic responses; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Nerve Net - diagnostic imaging; Nerve Net - physiology; Number systems; Photic Stimulation - methods; Populations; Reproducibility of Results; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Topographic mapping; Topographic maps; Topography; Visual Perception - physiology
• ISSN: 2041-1723; 2041-1723
• DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23785-7

Numerosity, the set size of a group of items, helps guide behaviour and decisions. Non-symbolic numerosities are represented by the approximate number system. However, distinct behavioural performance suggests that small numerosities, i.e. subitizing range, are implemented differently in the brain than larger numerosities. Prior work has shown that neural populations selectively responding (i.e. hemodynamic responses) to small numerosities are organized into a network of topographical maps. Here, we investigate how neural populations respond to large numerosities, well into the ANS. Using 7 T fMRI and biologically-inspired analyses, we found a network of neural populations tuned to both small and large numerosities organized within the same topographic maps. These results demonstrate a continuum of numerosity preferences that progressively cover both the subitizing range and beyond within the same numerosity map, suggesting a single neural mechanism. We hypothesize that differences in map properties, such as cortical magnification and tuning width, underlie known differences in behaviour. Here, the authors show that the brain represents small and large numerosity ranges in a continuous topographic map, in line with the idea that differences in map properties underlie differences in perception.