Loading…

The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs

Conventional pork production, based on highly selected breeds for growth efficiency and carcass leanness, is generally considered to decrease pork quality. In contrast, non-selected breeds produced in extensive systems are associated with high pork quality, which is generally attributed to higher in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1976-1986
Main Authors: Lefaucheur, L., Lebret, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3
container_end_page 1986
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1976
container_title Animal (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 14
creator Lefaucheur, L.
Lebret, B.
description Conventional pork production, based on highly selected breeds for growth efficiency and carcass leanness, is generally considered to decrease pork quality. In contrast, non-selected breeds produced in extensive systems are associated with high pork quality, which is generally attributed to higher intramuscular fat (IMF) content and less glycolytic muscle metabolism. The present study aimed to determine biochemical, histological and quality traits of loin and ham muscles of pigs from selected Large White (LW) and local French, non-selected Basque (B) breeds. Pigs were reared in a conventional indoor (C, slatted floor), alternative (A, indoor bedding and outdoor area) or extensive system (E, free range, B pigs only). A total of 100 castrated males were produced in 2 replicates, each containing 5 groups of 10 pigs based on breed and system: LWC, LWA, BC, BA and BE. The glycolytic longissimus muscle (LM) and semimembranosus muscle (SM), and the deep red (RSTM) and superficial white (WSTM) portions of semitendinosus muscle (STM) were studied at 145 kg BW. Overall, breed induced stronger effects on muscle traits than the rearing system, among which the E system induced greater changes. The lower muscle growth of B pigs was associated with fewer muscle fibers and a smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of glycolytic fibers (P < 0.01). The SM was less glycolytic and more oxidative in B than in LW pigs (P < 0.001). The WSTM followed a similar trend, with a larger relative area of type I fibers in B pigs. In contrast, the LM and RSTM were more oxidative in LW pigs. B pigs had higher IMF content and ultimate pH in all muscles, along with lower glycolytic potential, less light and redder meat in the LM and SM (P < 0.001). Compared to the C system, the A system induced only a shift towards a more oxidative metabolism in the LM and a smaller fiber CSA in the RSTM of LW pigs (P < 0.05), without influencing pork quality traits. Compared to BC pigs, BE pigs had a more oxidative and less glycolytic muscle metabolism, along with higher ultimate pH, lower lightness and redder meat (P < 0.01), but similar IMF content. Overall, results indicate that influences of breed and rearing system on muscle properties depend on muscle type, and that IMF content and fiber-type composition are unrelated traits that can be modified independently by genetic or rearing factors.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S175173112000066X
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_594b9752e4d443e88093e877257ebf79</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S175173112000066X</cupid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_594b9752e4d443e88093e877257ebf79</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2434695177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kktv1DAQgCMEoqXwA7igSFzgsOD349hWQCutxIEierO88TjrVRIvdgLqsf-83uyyCBA-2Nb48-fReKrqJUbvMMLy_RcsOZYUY4LKEOL2UXW6Cy0kJbePj3uMT6pnOW8Q4hoz9rQ6oYQwpYQ4re5v1lAnsCkMbZ3v8gh93Uc3dXaEXK9CbNbQh8Z2tR1cvQ55jF1s54AL3kOCoSlgGOoulmmGbFFMuel2Ahh_Agz1hc3fJ5iPlza1UH9bhxHqbWjz8-qJt12GF4f1rPr68cPN5dVi-fnT9eX5ctFwLMaFkwpJxbGnTmnmZQNKSsI0KNtwq7zkTFuiLSeOaCqQF7YB4YXijngpPD2rrvdeF-3GbFPobboz0QYzB2JqjU1jKGkbrtlKS06AOcYoKIU0nZ_jElZe6uJ6u3etbfeH6up8aXYxRAThmKMfuLBv9uw2xVKDPJo-5Aa6zg4Qp2wIVYJRqTEv6Ou_0E2c0lCqYgijTOjy27JQeE81KeacwB8zwMjs-sL80xflzquDeVr14I43fjVCAehBavtVCq6F32__X_sA9anAsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434695177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Lefaucheur, L. ; Lebret, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, L. ; Lebret, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional pork production, based on highly selected breeds for growth efficiency and carcass leanness, is generally considered to decrease pork quality. In contrast, non-selected breeds produced in extensive systems are associated with high pork quality, which is generally attributed to higher intramuscular fat (IMF) content and less glycolytic muscle metabolism. The present study aimed to determine biochemical, histological and quality traits of loin and ham muscles of pigs from selected Large White (LW) and local French, non-selected Basque (B) breeds. Pigs were reared in a conventional indoor (C, slatted floor), alternative (A, indoor bedding and outdoor area) or extensive system (E, free range, B pigs only). A total of 100 castrated males were produced in 2 replicates, each containing 5 groups of 10 pigs based on breed and system: LWC, LWA, BC, BA and BE. The glycolytic longissimus muscle (LM) and semimembranosus muscle (SM), and the deep red (RSTM) and superficial white (WSTM) portions of semitendinosus muscle (STM) were studied at 145 kg BW. Overall, breed induced stronger effects on muscle traits than the rearing system, among which the E system induced greater changes. The lower muscle growth of B pigs was associated with fewer muscle fibers and a smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of glycolytic fibers (P &lt; 0.01). The SM was less glycolytic and more oxidative in B than in LW pigs (P &lt; 0.001). The WSTM followed a similar trend, with a larger relative area of type I fibers in B pigs. In contrast, the LM and RSTM were more oxidative in LW pigs. B pigs had higher IMF content and ultimate pH in all muscles, along with lower glycolytic potential, less light and redder meat in the LM and SM (P &lt; 0.001). Compared to the C system, the A system induced only a shift towards a more oxidative metabolism in the LM and a smaller fiber CSA in the RSTM of LW pigs (P &lt; 0.05), without influencing pork quality traits. Compared to BC pigs, BE pigs had a more oxidative and less glycolytic muscle metabolism, along with higher ultimate pH, lower lightness and redder meat (P &lt; 0.01), but similar IMF content. Overall, results indicate that influences of breed and rearing system on muscle properties depend on muscle type, and that IMF content and fiber-type composition are unrelated traits that can be modified independently by genetic or rearing factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S175173112000066X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32248866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Animal production studies ; Animals ; Bedding ; Body Composition ; breed ; Consumption ; Experiments ; Farms ; Feeds ; Fibers ; Glycolysis ; Ham ; Hogs ; Influence ; intramuscular fat ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Meat ; Meat quality ; Metabolism ; muscle energy metabolism ; muscle fiber type ; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal ; Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism ; Muscles ; Natural &amp; organic foods ; Oxidative metabolism ; pH effects ; Physical growth ; Pork ; pork quality ; Quality of Animal Products ; Research Article ; Spain ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Animal (Cambridge, England), 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1976-1986</ispartof><rights>The Animal Consortium 2020</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5435-0389</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32248866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02625150$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebret, B.</creatorcontrib><title>The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs</title><title>Animal (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><description>Conventional pork production, based on highly selected breeds for growth efficiency and carcass leanness, is generally considered to decrease pork quality. In contrast, non-selected breeds produced in extensive systems are associated with high pork quality, which is generally attributed to higher intramuscular fat (IMF) content and less glycolytic muscle metabolism. The present study aimed to determine biochemical, histological and quality traits of loin and ham muscles of pigs from selected Large White (LW) and local French, non-selected Basque (B) breeds. Pigs were reared in a conventional indoor (C, slatted floor), alternative (A, indoor bedding and outdoor area) or extensive system (E, free range, B pigs only). A total of 100 castrated males were produced in 2 replicates, each containing 5 groups of 10 pigs based on breed and system: LWC, LWA, BC, BA and BE. The glycolytic longissimus muscle (LM) and semimembranosus muscle (SM), and the deep red (RSTM) and superficial white (WSTM) portions of semitendinosus muscle (STM) were studied at 145 kg BW. Overall, breed induced stronger effects on muscle traits than the rearing system, among which the E system induced greater changes. The lower muscle growth of B pigs was associated with fewer muscle fibers and a smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of glycolytic fibers (P &lt; 0.01). The SM was less glycolytic and more oxidative in B than in LW pigs (P &lt; 0.001). The WSTM followed a similar trend, with a larger relative area of type I fibers in B pigs. In contrast, the LM and RSTM were more oxidative in LW pigs. B pigs had higher IMF content and ultimate pH in all muscles, along with lower glycolytic potential, less light and redder meat in the LM and SM (P &lt; 0.001). Compared to the C system, the A system induced only a shift towards a more oxidative metabolism in the LM and a smaller fiber CSA in the RSTM of LW pigs (P &lt; 0.05), without influencing pork quality traits. Compared to BC pigs, BE pigs had a more oxidative and less glycolytic muscle metabolism, along with higher ultimate pH, lower lightness and redder meat (P &lt; 0.01), but similar IMF content. Overall, results indicate that influences of breed and rearing system on muscle properties depend on muscle type, and that IMF content and fiber-type composition are unrelated traits that can be modified independently by genetic or rearing factors.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Animal production studies</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bedding</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>breed</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Glycolysis</subject><subject>Ham</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>intramuscular fat</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>muscle energy metabolism</subject><subject>muscle fiber type</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Natural &amp; organic foods</subject><subject>Oxidative metabolism</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>pork quality</subject><subject>Quality of Animal Products</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kktv1DAQgCMEoqXwA7igSFzgsOD349hWQCutxIEierO88TjrVRIvdgLqsf-83uyyCBA-2Nb48-fReKrqJUbvMMLy_RcsOZYUY4LKEOL2UXW6Cy0kJbePj3uMT6pnOW8Q4hoz9rQ6oYQwpYQ4re5v1lAnsCkMbZ3v8gh93Uc3dXaEXK9CbNbQh8Z2tR1cvQ55jF1s54AL3kOCoSlgGOoulmmGbFFMuel2Ahh_Agz1hc3fJ5iPlza1UH9bhxHqbWjz8-qJt12GF4f1rPr68cPN5dVi-fnT9eX5ctFwLMaFkwpJxbGnTmnmZQNKSsI0KNtwq7zkTFuiLSeOaCqQF7YB4YXijngpPD2rrvdeF-3GbFPobboz0QYzB2JqjU1jKGkbrtlKS06AOcYoKIU0nZ_jElZe6uJ6u3etbfeH6up8aXYxRAThmKMfuLBv9uw2xVKDPJo-5Aa6zg4Qp2wIVYJRqTEv6Ou_0E2c0lCqYgijTOjy27JQeE81KeacwB8zwMjs-sL80xflzquDeVr14I43fjVCAehBavtVCq6F32__X_sA9anAsg</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Lefaucheur, L.</creator><creator>Lebret, B.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Published by Elsevier (since 2021) / Cambridge University Press (until 2020)</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-0389</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs</title><author>Lefaucheur, L. ; Lebret, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Animal production studies</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bedding</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>breed</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Glycolysis</topic><topic>Ham</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>intramuscular fat</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>muscle energy metabolism</topic><topic>muscle fiber type</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Skeletal</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Natural &amp; organic foods</topic><topic>Oxidative metabolism</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>pork quality</topic><topic>Quality of Animal Products</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebret, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lefaucheur, L.</au><au>Lebret, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs</atitle><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1976</spage><epage>1986</epage><pages>1976-1986</pages><issn>1751-7311</issn><eissn>1751-732X</eissn><abstract>Conventional pork production, based on highly selected breeds for growth efficiency and carcass leanness, is generally considered to decrease pork quality. In contrast, non-selected breeds produced in extensive systems are associated with high pork quality, which is generally attributed to higher intramuscular fat (IMF) content and less glycolytic muscle metabolism. The present study aimed to determine biochemical, histological and quality traits of loin and ham muscles of pigs from selected Large White (LW) and local French, non-selected Basque (B) breeds. Pigs were reared in a conventional indoor (C, slatted floor), alternative (A, indoor bedding and outdoor area) or extensive system (E, free range, B pigs only). A total of 100 castrated males were produced in 2 replicates, each containing 5 groups of 10 pigs based on breed and system: LWC, LWA, BC, BA and BE. The glycolytic longissimus muscle (LM) and semimembranosus muscle (SM), and the deep red (RSTM) and superficial white (WSTM) portions of semitendinosus muscle (STM) were studied at 145 kg BW. Overall, breed induced stronger effects on muscle traits than the rearing system, among which the E system induced greater changes. The lower muscle growth of B pigs was associated with fewer muscle fibers and a smaller cross-sectional area (CSA) of glycolytic fibers (P &lt; 0.01). The SM was less glycolytic and more oxidative in B than in LW pigs (P &lt; 0.001). The WSTM followed a similar trend, with a larger relative area of type I fibers in B pigs. In contrast, the LM and RSTM were more oxidative in LW pigs. B pigs had higher IMF content and ultimate pH in all muscles, along with lower glycolytic potential, less light and redder meat in the LM and SM (P &lt; 0.001). Compared to the C system, the A system induced only a shift towards a more oxidative metabolism in the LM and a smaller fiber CSA in the RSTM of LW pigs (P &lt; 0.05), without influencing pork quality traits. Compared to BC pigs, BE pigs had a more oxidative and less glycolytic muscle metabolism, along with higher ultimate pH, lower lightness and redder meat (P &lt; 0.01), but similar IMF content. Overall, results indicate that influences of breed and rearing system on muscle properties depend on muscle type, and that IMF content and fiber-type composition are unrelated traits that can be modified independently by genetic or rearing factors.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>32248866</pmid><doi>10.1017/S175173112000066X</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-0389</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7311
ispartof Animal (Cambridge, England), 2020-09, Vol.14 (9), p.1976-1986
issn 1751-7311
1751-732X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_594b9752e4d443e88093e877257ebf79
source ScienceDirect®
subjects Agricultural sciences
Animal production studies
Animals
Bedding
Body Composition
breed
Consumption
Experiments
Farms
Feeds
Fibers
Glycolysis
Ham
Hogs
Influence
intramuscular fat
Life Sciences
Male
Meat
Meat quality
Metabolism
muscle energy metabolism
muscle fiber type
Muscle Fibers, Skeletal
Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism
Muscles
Natural & organic foods
Oxidative metabolism
pH effects
Physical growth
Pork
pork quality
Quality of Animal Products
Research Article
Spain
Swine
title The rearing system modulates biochemical and histological differences in loin and ham muscles between Basque and Large White pigs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20rearing%20system%20modulates%20biochemical%20and%20histological%20differences%20in%20loin%20and%20ham%20muscles%20between%20Basque%20and%20Large%20White%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Animal%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Lefaucheur,%20L.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1976&rft.epage=1986&rft.pages=1976-1986&rft.issn=1751-7311&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S175173112000066X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2434695177%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-d7807851f3d894f7ce877249e8ac5a8f7549a29a52d29360f6ace6f685d2f76f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434695177&rft_id=info:pmid/32248866&rft_cupid=10_1017_S175173112000066X&rfr_iscdi=true