Loading…
Outcomes and Prognostic Impact of Prophylactic Oral Anticoagulation in Anterior ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Background The contemporary role of prophylactic anticoagulation following extensive anterior wall ST‐segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear. Methods and Results We evaluated anterior STEMI patients with left ventricle dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) (“high risk”), ca...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Heart Association 2017-07, Vol.6 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The contemporary role of prophylactic anticoagulation following extensive anterior wall ST‐segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unclear.
Methods and Results
We evaluated anterior STEMI patients with left ventricle dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) (“high risk”), categorized by prophylactic warfarin use, within a regional STEMI. Patients with pre‐existing atrial fibrillation were excluded. The primary outcome was an adjusted (for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score) 1‐year composite of recurrent ischemia, stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, or all‐cause death. Of the 2032 STEMI admissions, 436 (21.5%) were high risk. After excluding 19 (4.4%) patients with definite left ventricle thrombus and 21 (4.8%) in‐hospital deaths (2 had left ventricle thrombus), prophylactic warfarin was utilized in 236/398 (59.3%) high‐risk survivors. Prescriptions were comparable across sex, but recipients were on average younger (58.5 years versus 64.0 years, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-9980 2047-9980 |
DOI: | 10.1161/JAHA.117.006054 |