Loading…

Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?

Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultures (Montrouge) 2022, Vol.31, p.2
Main Authors: Gillot, Mélisande, Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène, Jeanneaux, Philippe
Format: Article
Language:eng ; fre
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 2
container_title Agricultures (Montrouge)
container_volume 31
creator Gillot, Mélisande
Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène
Jeanneaux, Philippe
description Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de Data Envelopment Analysis en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée. Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.
doi_str_mv 10.1051/cagri/2021036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2671962518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcuKFDEUhgtRcBxdui9w5aKck6RycyPDeJmBBje6DunkpE1TXSmT6kF34s4nkX6OfhOfxPQFwU1y-PnPxznnb5rnBF4R4OTK2VWOVxQoASYeNBdEStlx3euHtSZCdFJo_bh5UsoaoGcg4KL5-TaGsN9lHF20c0xji3Pr0mba7-Y4x_s473d_fvx63X7d4jBgO2EOKW_s6GqdtrkdsLT4bRpSnI_9pa090aWDHrId979tLLUuaVufuBqx9Vhpdjij3zxtHgU7FHx2_i-bz-_ffbq57RYfP9zdXC86x4gW3dILhUslFfMUNGMQFFBPkDFFrSBKkiWCVtR5JXqLvLcsMCY0J9RzxSW7bO5OXJ_s2kw5bmz-bpKN5iikvDI219EHNFwL5wMEzRF7HZhCjbAE63srqSOusl6eWF_s8B_q9nphDhr0ICln5J5U74uTd8qpXrHMZl0PN9ZVDRWyrkY5UdXVnVwup1Iyhn9YAuYQrznGa87xsr_I-p7e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671962518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de Data Envelopment Analysis en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée. Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1166-7699</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1777-5949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1777-5949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2021036</identifier><language>eng ; fre</language><publisher>Paris: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; agriculture biologique ; appellation d’origine protégée ; Data analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Differentiation ; différenciation ; Economic analysis ; efficacité économique ; Efficiency ; Farming ; Farms ; Income ; Life Sciences ; Organic farming ; Sciences and technics of agriculture ; signe de qualité ; Vineyards ; Viticulture ; Wine ; Wines</subject><ispartof>Agricultures (Montrouge), 2022, Vol.31, p.2</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1572-7432 ; 0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04072531$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><title>Agricultures (Montrouge)</title><description>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de Data Envelopment Analysis en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée. Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>agriculture biologique</subject><subject>appellation d’origine protégée</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>différenciation</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>efficacité économique</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Sciences and technics of agriculture</subject><subject>signe de qualité</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>Wine</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>1166-7699</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcuKFDEUhgtRcBxdui9w5aKck6RycyPDeJmBBje6DunkpE1TXSmT6kF34s4nkX6OfhOfxPQFwU1y-PnPxznnb5rnBF4R4OTK2VWOVxQoASYeNBdEStlx3euHtSZCdFJo_bh5UsoaoGcg4KL5-TaGsN9lHF20c0xji3Pr0mba7-Y4x_s473d_fvx63X7d4jBgO2EOKW_s6GqdtrkdsLT4bRpSnI_9pa090aWDHrId979tLLUuaVufuBqx9Vhpdjij3zxtHgU7FHx2_i-bz-_ffbq57RYfP9zdXC86x4gW3dILhUslFfMUNGMQFFBPkDFFrSBKkiWCVtR5JXqLvLcsMCY0J9RzxSW7bO5OXJ_s2kw5bmz-bpKN5iikvDI219EHNFwL5wMEzRF7HZhCjbAE63srqSOusl6eWF_s8B_q9nphDhr0ICln5J5U74uTd8qpXrHMZl0PN9ZVDRWyrkY5UdXVnVwup1Iyhn9YAuYQrznGa87xsr_I-p7e</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Gillot, Mélisande</creator><creator>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creator><creator>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-7432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><author>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>agriculture biologique</topic><topic>appellation d’origine protégée</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>différenciation</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>efficacité économique</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Sciences and technics of agriculture</topic><topic>signe de qualité</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>Wine</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agricultures (Montrouge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillot, Mélisande</au><au>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</au><au>Jeanneaux, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</atitle><jtitle>Agricultures (Montrouge)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>2</spage><pages>2-</pages><issn>1166-7699</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><eissn>1777-5949</eissn><abstract>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de Data Envelopment Analysis en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée. Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/cagri/2021036</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-7432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1166-7699
ispartof Agricultures (Montrouge), 2022, Vol.31, p.2
issn 1166-7699
1777-5949
1777-5949
language eng ; fre
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Agricultural economics
Agricultural sciences
Agriculture
agriculture biologique
appellation d’origine protégée
Data analysis
Data envelopment analysis
Differentiation
différenciation
Economic analysis
efficacité économique
Efficiency
Farming
Farms
Income
Life Sciences
Organic farming
Sciences and technics of agriculture
signe de qualité
Vineyards
Viticulture
Wine
Wines
title Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diff%C3%A9renciation%20et%20comp%C3%A9titivit%C3%A9%E2%80%89:%20quelle%20performance%20pour%20les%20exploitations%20viticoles%20fran%C3%A7aises%20sous%20signe%20de%20qualit%C3%A9%E2%80%89?&rft.jtitle=Agricultures%20(Montrouge)&rft.au=Gillot,%20M%C3%A9lisande&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=2&rft.pages=2-&rft.issn=1166-7699&rft.eissn=1777-5949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/cagri/2021036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2671962518%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671962518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true