Loading…
Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?
Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agricultures (Montrouge) 2022, Vol.31, p.2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; fre |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 2 |
container_title | Agricultures (Montrouge) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Gillot, Mélisande Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène Jeanneaux, Philippe |
description | Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de
Data Envelopment Analysis
en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée.
Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1051/cagri/2021036 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2671962518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcuKFDEUhgtRcBxdui9w5aKck6RycyPDeJmBBje6DunkpE1TXSmT6kF34s4nkX6OfhOfxPQFwU1y-PnPxznnb5rnBF4R4OTK2VWOVxQoASYeNBdEStlx3euHtSZCdFJo_bh5UsoaoGcg4KL5-TaGsN9lHF20c0xji3Pr0mba7-Y4x_s473d_fvx63X7d4jBgO2EOKW_s6GqdtrkdsLT4bRpSnI_9pa090aWDHrId979tLLUuaVufuBqx9Vhpdjij3zxtHgU7FHx2_i-bz-_ffbq57RYfP9zdXC86x4gW3dILhUslFfMUNGMQFFBPkDFFrSBKkiWCVtR5JXqLvLcsMCY0J9RzxSW7bO5OXJ_s2kw5bmz-bpKN5iikvDI219EHNFwL5wMEzRF7HZhCjbAE63srqSOusl6eWF_s8B_q9nphDhr0ICln5J5U74uTd8qpXrHMZl0PN9ZVDRWyrkY5UdXVnVwup1Iyhn9YAuYQrznGa87xsr_I-p7e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2671962518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de
Data Envelopment Analysis
en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée.
Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1166-7699</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1777-5949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1777-5949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1051/cagri/2021036</identifier><language>eng ; fre</language><publisher>Paris: EDP Sciences</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural sciences ; Agriculture ; agriculture biologique ; appellation d’origine protégée ; Data analysis ; Data envelopment analysis ; Differentiation ; différenciation ; Economic analysis ; efficacité économique ; Efficiency ; Farming ; Farms ; Income ; Life Sciences ; Organic farming ; Sciences and technics of agriculture ; signe de qualité ; Vineyards ; Viticulture ; Wine ; Wines</subject><ispartof>Agricultures (Montrouge), 2022, Vol.31, p.2</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1572-7432 ; 0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04072531$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><title>Agricultures (Montrouge)</title><description>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de
Data Envelopment Analysis
en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée.
Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>agriculture biologique</subject><subject>appellation d’origine protégée</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>différenciation</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>efficacité économique</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Sciences and technics of agriculture</subject><subject>signe de qualité</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>Wine</subject><subject>Wines</subject><issn>1166-7699</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcuKFDEUhgtRcBxdui9w5aKck6RycyPDeJmBBje6DunkpE1TXSmT6kF34s4nkX6OfhOfxPQFwU1y-PnPxznnb5rnBF4R4OTK2VWOVxQoASYeNBdEStlx3euHtSZCdFJo_bh5UsoaoGcg4KL5-TaGsN9lHF20c0xji3Pr0mba7-Y4x_s473d_fvx63X7d4jBgO2EOKW_s6GqdtrkdsLT4bRpSnI_9pa090aWDHrId979tLLUuaVufuBqx9Vhpdjij3zxtHgU7FHx2_i-bz-_ffbq57RYfP9zdXC86x4gW3dILhUslFfMUNGMQFFBPkDFFrSBKkiWCVtR5JXqLvLcsMCY0J9RzxSW7bO5OXJ_s2kw5bmz-bpKN5iikvDI219EHNFwL5wMEzRF7HZhCjbAE63srqSOusl6eWF_s8B_q9nphDhr0ICln5J5U74uTd8qpXrHMZl0PN9ZVDRWyrkY5UdXVnVwup1Iyhn9YAuYQrznGa87xsr_I-p7e</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Gillot, Mélisande</creator><creator>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creator><creator>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creator><general>EDP Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-7432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</title><author>Gillot, Mélisande ; Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène ; Jeanneaux, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; fre</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>agriculture biologique</topic><topic>appellation d’origine protégée</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>différenciation</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>efficacité économique</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Sciences and technics of agriculture</topic><topic>signe de qualité</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>Wine</topic><topic>Wines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillot, Mélisande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanneaux, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agricultures (Montrouge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillot, Mélisande</au><au>Blasquiet-Revol, Hélène</au><au>Jeanneaux, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ?</atitle><jtitle>Agricultures (Montrouge)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><spage>2</spage><pages>2-</pages><issn>1166-7699</issn><issn>1777-5949</issn><eissn>1777-5949</eissn><abstract>Les politiques de labellisation (Appellation d’origine protégée [AOP], Agriculture biologique [AB]) sont censées accroître le revenu des producteurs. Mais le revenu des agriculteurs n’est pas automatiquement amélioré par l’adoption d’une stratégie de différenciation. Nous analysons les performances économiques et techniques des exploitations ayant cette stratégie en évaluant leur efficacité technique pure et prix à l’aide de la méthode de
Data Envelopment Analysis
en 2014 et 2015. Nous utilisons les données du Réseau d’information comptable agricole et montrons que les exploitations en appellation d’origine protégée ont des scores d’efficacité plus faibles que celles n’ayant pas adopté ce signe de qualité. L’efficacité est variable selon les bassins viticoles. Il ressort par ailleurs que les exploitations en agriculture biologique ont des efficacités inférieures aux exploitations conventionnelles sur la période étudiée.
Labeling policies (Protected Designation of Origin [PDO]; Organic Farming) are supposed to increase farmers’ income even if income is not automatically improved by the adoption of a strategy of differentiation. Are the adoption choices of a PDO or an Organic Farming label in viticulture economically relevant? We analyze the technical and price performance of wine-growing farms that have chosen a strategy of differentiation by evaluating economic efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis. We used French vineyards data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network for 2014 and 2015. We show that PDO farms have lower efficiency scores than those that did not adopt this quality label. Efficiency varies according to the wine-growing regions. It also appears that organic farms have lower efficiencies than conventional farms for the period of study.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>EDP Sciences</pub><doi>10.1051/cagri/2021036</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1572-7432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-9185</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1166-7699 |
ispartof | Agricultures (Montrouge), 2022, Vol.31, p.2 |
issn | 1166-7699 1777-5949 1777-5949 |
language | eng ; fre |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_596cdf0f95ee49f38e9e0b0ad4a72c1c |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural sciences Agriculture agriculture biologique appellation d’origine protégée Data analysis Data envelopment analysis Differentiation différenciation Economic analysis efficacité économique Efficiency Farming Farms Income Life Sciences Organic farming Sciences and technics of agriculture signe de qualité Vineyards Viticulture Wine Wines |
title | Différenciation et compétitivité : quelle performance pour les exploitations viticoles françaises sous signe de qualité ? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diff%C3%A9renciation%20et%20comp%C3%A9titivit%C3%A9%E2%80%89:%20quelle%20performance%20pour%20les%20exploitations%20viticoles%20fran%C3%A7aises%20sous%20signe%20de%20qualit%C3%A9%E2%80%89?&rft.jtitle=Agricultures%20(Montrouge)&rft.au=Gillot,%20M%C3%A9lisande&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=31&rft.spage=2&rft.pages=2-&rft.issn=1166-7699&rft.eissn=1777-5949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1051/cagri/2021036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2671962518%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-bd68eb8783d209330f802d1e3382a61871be0982cd864ae54a3f3369512d58573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2671962518&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |