Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research

• Published in: BMC medical informatics and decision making 2019-04, Vol.19 (1), p.90-90, Article 90
• Main Authors: Beier, Katharina, Schweda, Mark, Schicktanz, Silke
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asthma; Big Data; Bioethics; Biomaterials; Biomedical materials; Biomedical research; Biomedical Research - ethics; Citizens; Communication; Data management; Datasets; Debate; Demographics; Empowerment; Ethical Analysis; Ethical standards; Ethics; Health care; Humans; Initiatives; Intention; Medical research; Medicine; Negligence; Participation; Participatory health research; Patient Participation; Patients; Public health; R&D; Research & development; Research ethics; Science; Smartphones; Trust; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 1472-6947; 1472-6947
• DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7

Data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare such as health-related big data research (HBDR) implies that data from clinical routine, research and patient-reported data, but also non-medical social or demographic data, are aggregated and linked in order to optimize biomedical research. In this context, notions of patient participation and involvement are frequently invoked to legitimize this kind of research and improve its governance. The aim of this debate paper is to critically examine the specific use and ethical role of participatory concepts in the context of HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare. We introduce basic conceptual distinctions for the understanding of participation by looking at relevant fields of application in politics, bioethics and medical research. Against this backdrop, we identify three paradigmatic participatory roles that patients/subjects are assigned within the field of HBDR: participants as providers of biomaterials and data, participants as administrators of their own research participation and participants as (co-)principal investigators. We further illustrate these roles by exemplary data-intensive research-initiatives. Our analysis of these initiatives and their respective participatory promises reveals specific ethical and practical shortcomings and challenges. Central problems affecting, amongst others, ethical and methodological research standards, as well as public trust in research, result from the negligence of essential political-ethical dimensions of genuine participation. Based on the conceptual distinctions introduced, we formulate basic criteria for justified appeals to participatory approaches in HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare in order to overcome these shortcomings. As we suggest, this is not only a matter of conceptual clarity, but a crucial requirement for maintaining ethical standards and trust in HBDR and related medical research.