Loading…
A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis
Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with M...
Saved in:
Published in: | NPJ digital medicine 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | NPJ digital medicine |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Tea, Fiona Groh, Adam M. R. Lacey, Colleen Fakolade, Afolasade |
description | Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications (
n
= 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3072292370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCYxvibNCVcWlUiU23VuOM8nxkU8cbKdV377OSSktC1a2Z_75PDP6i-I9gc8EmPwSOWl4XQHlFRBS0wpeFaeUtbKqmaCvn91PivMY9wBAgcuW12-LEyZbIrlkp8V8UUbjZzuNZcBbi3eljhFjXANph-USdWedTfelH8rejjZpV-5Qu7QrE5rd5J0fLcYy6TBiWstm9LPD8s5myWFxya6vaBwGH218V7wZtIt4_nieFTffv91c_qyuf_24ury4rgynNFXMsMYwkIJJIUSH2PQ4cBgGIFowMAZFLxpK21qQTjdtL-qG93kPdDDQ1uysuNqwvdd7NQd70OFeeW3VMeDDqHRINnelhAbZ9cwA1JTj0HTYirw3iZ3kdd2bzPq6sealO2BvcEpBuxfQl5nJ7tTobxUhpF1ZmfDpkRD87wVjUgcbDTqnJ_RLVAzWUShrIEs__iPd-yVMeVVHFcg8Mc0quqlMXmoMODx1Q0Ct_lCbP1T2hzr6Q63oD8_neCr544YsYJsg5tQ0Yvj793-wDz5Ax2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072089652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</creator><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications (
n
= 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-6352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-6352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38918483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/371 ; 692/308/575 ; 692/700/565 ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Caregivers ; Digital technology ; Health care access ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multiple sclerosis ; Review ; Review Article ; Telemedicine ; Usability ; Wearable computers</subject><ispartof>NPJ digital medicine, 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199563/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072089652?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38918483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groh, Adam M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><title>NPJ digital medicine</title><addtitle>npj Digit. Med</addtitle><addtitle>NPJ Digit Med</addtitle><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications (
n
= 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</description><subject>631/378/371</subject><subject>692/308/575</subject><subject>692/700/565</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Wearable computers</subject><issn>2398-6352</issn><issn>2398-6352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCYxvibNCVcWlUiU23VuOM8nxkU8cbKdV377OSSktC1a2Z_75PDP6i-I9gc8EmPwSOWl4XQHlFRBS0wpeFaeUtbKqmaCvn91PivMY9wBAgcuW12-LEyZbIrlkp8V8UUbjZzuNZcBbi3eljhFjXANph-USdWedTfelH8rejjZpV-5Qu7QrE5rd5J0fLcYy6TBiWstm9LPD8s5myWFxya6vaBwGH218V7wZtIt4_nieFTffv91c_qyuf_24ury4rgynNFXMsMYwkIJJIUSH2PQ4cBgGIFowMAZFLxpK21qQTjdtL-qG93kPdDDQ1uysuNqwvdd7NQd70OFeeW3VMeDDqHRINnelhAbZ9cwA1JTj0HTYirw3iZ3kdd2bzPq6sealO2BvcEpBuxfQl5nJ7tTobxUhpF1ZmfDpkRD87wVjUgcbDTqnJ_RLVAzWUShrIEs__iPd-yVMeVVHFcg8Mc0quqlMXmoMODx1Q0Ct_lCbP1T2hzr6Q63oD8_neCr544YsYJsg5tQ0Yvj793-wDz5Ax2s</recordid><startdate>20240625</startdate><enddate>20240625</enddate><creator>Tea, Fiona</creator><creator>Groh, Adam M. R.</creator><creator>Lacey, Colleen</creator><creator>Fakolade, Afolasade</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240625</creationdate><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><author>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>631/378/371</topic><topic>692/308/575</topic><topic>692/700/565</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Wearable computers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groh, Adam M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>NPJ digital medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tea, Fiona</au><au>Groh, Adam M. R.</au><au>Lacey, Colleen</au><au>Fakolade, Afolasade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>NPJ digital medicine</jtitle><stitle>npj Digit. Med</stitle><addtitle>NPJ Digit Med</addtitle><date>2024-06-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>168-10</pages><artnum>168</artnum><issn>2398-6352</issn><eissn>2398-6352</eissn><abstract>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications (
n
= 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38918483</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2398-6352 |
ispartof | NPJ digital medicine, 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168 |
issn | 2398-6352 2398-6352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 631/378/371 692/308/575 692/700/565 Biomedicine Biotechnology Caregivers Digital technology Health care access Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multiple sclerosis Review Review Article Telemedicine Usability Wearable computers |
title | A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20scoping%20review%20assessing%20the%20usability%20of%20digital%20health%20technologies%20targeting%20people%20with%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=NPJ%20digital%20medicine&rft.au=Tea,%20Fiona&rft.date=2024-06-25&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=168-10&rft.artnum=168&rft.issn=2398-6352&rft.eissn=2398-6352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3072292370%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072089652&rft_id=info:pmid/38918483&rfr_iscdi=true |