Loading…

A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis

Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NPJ digital medicine 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168
Main Authors: Tea, Fiona, Groh, Adam M. R., Lacey, Colleen, Fakolade, Afolasade
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 168
container_title NPJ digital medicine
container_volume 7
creator Tea, Fiona
Groh, Adam M. R.
Lacey, Colleen
Fakolade, Afolasade
description Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications ( n  = 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3072292370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCYxvibNCVcWlUiU23VuOM8nxkU8cbKdV377OSSktC1a2Z_75PDP6i-I9gc8EmPwSOWl4XQHlFRBS0wpeFaeUtbKqmaCvn91PivMY9wBAgcuW12-LEyZbIrlkp8V8UUbjZzuNZcBbi3eljhFjXANph-USdWedTfelH8rejjZpV-5Qu7QrE5rd5J0fLcYy6TBiWstm9LPD8s5myWFxya6vaBwGH218V7wZtIt4_nieFTffv91c_qyuf_24ury4rgynNFXMsMYwkIJJIUSH2PQ4cBgGIFowMAZFLxpK21qQTjdtL-qG93kPdDDQ1uysuNqwvdd7NQd70OFeeW3VMeDDqHRINnelhAbZ9cwA1JTj0HTYirw3iZ3kdd2bzPq6sealO2BvcEpBuxfQl5nJ7tTobxUhpF1ZmfDpkRD87wVjUgcbDTqnJ_RLVAzWUShrIEs__iPd-yVMeVVHFcg8Mc0quqlMXmoMODx1Q0Ct_lCbP1T2hzr6Q63oD8_neCr544YsYJsg5tQ0Yvj793-wDz5Ax2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072089652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</creator><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications ( n  = 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-6352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-6352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38918483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/371 ; 692/308/575 ; 692/700/565 ; Biomedicine ; Biotechnology ; Caregivers ; Digital technology ; Health care access ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Multiple sclerosis ; Review ; Review Article ; Telemedicine ; Usability ; Wearable computers</subject><ispartof>NPJ digital medicine, 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199563/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3072089652?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38918483$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groh, Adam M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><title>NPJ digital medicine</title><addtitle>npj Digit. Med</addtitle><addtitle>NPJ Digit Med</addtitle><description>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications ( n  = 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</description><subject>631/378/371</subject><subject>692/308/575</subject><subject>692/700/565</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Wearable computers</subject><issn>2398-6352</issn><issn>2398-6352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCYxvibNCVcWlUiU23VuOM8nxkU8cbKdV377OSSktC1a2Z_75PDP6i-I9gc8EmPwSOWl4XQHlFRBS0wpeFaeUtbKqmaCvn91PivMY9wBAgcuW12-LEyZbIrlkp8V8UUbjZzuNZcBbi3eljhFjXANph-USdWedTfelH8rejjZpV-5Qu7QrE5rd5J0fLcYy6TBiWstm9LPD8s5myWFxya6vaBwGH218V7wZtIt4_nieFTffv91c_qyuf_24ury4rgynNFXMsMYwkIJJIUSH2PQ4cBgGIFowMAZFLxpK21qQTjdtL-qG93kPdDDQ1uysuNqwvdd7NQd70OFeeW3VMeDDqHRINnelhAbZ9cwA1JTj0HTYirw3iZ3kdd2bzPq6sealO2BvcEpBuxfQl5nJ7tTobxUhpF1ZmfDpkRD87wVjUgcbDTqnJ_RLVAzWUShrIEs__iPd-yVMeVVHFcg8Mc0quqlMXmoMODx1Q0Ct_lCbP1T2hzr6Q63oD8_neCr544YsYJsg5tQ0Yvj793-wDz5Ax2s</recordid><startdate>20240625</startdate><enddate>20240625</enddate><creator>Tea, Fiona</creator><creator>Groh, Adam M. R.</creator><creator>Lacey, Colleen</creator><creator>Fakolade, Afolasade</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240625</creationdate><title>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</title><author>Tea, Fiona ; Groh, Adam M. R. ; Lacey, Colleen ; Fakolade, Afolasade</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>631/378/371</topic><topic>692/308/575</topic><topic>692/700/565</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Wearable computers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tea, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groh, Adam M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fakolade, Afolasade</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>NPJ digital medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tea, Fiona</au><au>Groh, Adam M. R.</au><au>Lacey, Colleen</au><au>Fakolade, Afolasade</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>NPJ digital medicine</jtitle><stitle>npj Digit. Med</stitle><addtitle>NPJ Digit Med</addtitle><date>2024-06-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>168-10</pages><artnum>168</artnum><issn>2398-6352</issn><eissn>2398-6352</eissn><abstract>Digital health technologies (DHTs) have become progressively more integrated into the healthcare of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). To ensure that DHTs meet end-users’ needs, it is essential to assess their usability. The objective of this study was to determine how DHTs targeting people with MS incorporate usability characteristics into their design and/or evaluation. We conducted a scoping review of DHT studies in MS published from 2010 to the present using PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and medRxiv. Covidence was used to facilitate the review. We included articles that focused on people with MS and/or their caregivers, studied DHTs (including mhealth, telehealth, and wearables), and employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs. Thirty-two studies that assessed usability were included, which represents a minority of studies (26%) that assessed DHTs in MS. The most common DHT was mobile applications ( n  = 23, 70%). Overall, studies were highly heterogeneous with respect to what usability principles were considered and how usability was assessed. These findings suggest that there is a major gap in the application of standardized usability assessments to DHTs in MS. Improvements in the standardization of usability assessments will have implications for the future of digital health care for people with MS.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38918483</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-5782</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2398-6352
ispartof NPJ digital medicine, 2024-06, Vol.7 (1), p.168-10, Article 168
issn 2398-6352
2398-6352
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a08bd3c00624ef7be956358eb8466dc
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/378/371
692/308/575
692/700/565
Biomedicine
Biotechnology
Caregivers
Digital technology
Health care access
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Multiple sclerosis
Review
Review Article
Telemedicine
Usability
Wearable computers
title A scoping review assessing the usability of digital health technologies targeting people with multiple sclerosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20scoping%20review%20assessing%20the%20usability%20of%20digital%20health%20technologies%20targeting%20people%20with%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=NPJ%20digital%20medicine&rft.au=Tea,%20Fiona&rft.date=2024-06-25&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=168-10&rft.artnum=168&rft.issn=2398-6352&rft.eissn=2398-6352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41746-024-01162-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3072292370%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-3c37c308538555bee7def40ff01a530cce5d57229651ba79d5674d1622fc0963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072089652&rft_id=info:pmid/38918483&rfr_iscdi=true