Loading…

How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level

The cultivation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is traditionally managed under shade because of its photosynthetic characteristics; however, its behavior can vary according to the genotype and environmental conditions where it is grown. In this sense, here, we explore the possible mechanisms of protec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agronomy (Basel) 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1422
Main Authors: Suárez, Juan Carlos, Gelpud, Cristian, Noriega, Jhon Eduar, Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1422
container_title Agronomy (Basel)
container_volume 11
creator Suárez, Juan Carlos
Gelpud, Cristian
Noriega, Jhon Eduar
Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés
description The cultivation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is traditionally managed under shade because of its photosynthetic characteristics; however, its behavior can vary according to the genotype and environmental conditions where it is grown. In this sense, here, we explore the possible mechanisms of protection against radiation stress and how these mechanisms are affected by variation between cocoa genotypes. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of the radiation level (HPAR, 2100 ± 46 mol m−2 s−1; MPAR, 1150 ± 42 mol m−2 s−1; LPAR, 636 ± 40 mol m−2 s−1) on the water status and gas exchange in plants of different cocoa genotypes (CCN-51, ICS-1, ICS-95, LUKER-40 and LUKER-50), and the occurrence of photoinhibition of PSII (as a marker of photodamage), followed by a characterization of the protection mechanisms, including the dynamics of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. We found significant changes in the specific leaf area (SLA) and the water potential of the leaf (ΨL) due to the level of radiation, affecting the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), which generated dynamic photoinhibition processes (PIDyn). Cocoa genotypes showed the lowest Light-saturated maximum net carbon assimilation rate (Amax) in HPAR. Moreover, the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) was negatively affected in HPAR for most cocoa genotypes, indicating less RuBisCO activity except for the ICS-95 genotype. The ICS-95 showed the highest values of Vcmax and maximum rate of regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) controlled by electron transport (Jmax) under HPAR. Hence, our results show that some genotypes were acclimated to full sun conditions, which translated into greater carbon use efficiency due to the maximization of photosynthetic rates accompanied by energy dissipation mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/agronomy11071422
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a119d65552c4d7b9e2964bb9271e082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5a119d65552c4d7b9e2964bb9271e082</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2554347141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhpfSQEKae46CXutWX7uyTiWx82EwFEJKj2JWOxvLrHccSU7wD8n_rWKXUioGaZgZnlczU1WXgn9VyvJv8BRppM1eCG6ElvJDdSa5UROtbP3xH_-0ukhpzcuxQk25Oave7umVzYnNQ99jxDGzGXkCdocj5f0WE5sjDOw15BVbjD4iJOzYA3QBcqDxO7sai8GwTyEx6tkvyBjZAw6H9JcDd5fCCzIYO3YdyK9wE3xBzmizpbEoJgaZ5RWyJUJfrhccPlUnPQwJL_6859XP25vH2f1k-eNuMbtaTrwyNk-sxykv_bbSd70xAqVtpGgQjdXeyEZpo3rLa5C2bcXUKqE9SC0tdI1v2kadV4sjtyNYu20MG4h7RxDcIUDxyUHMwQ_oahDCdk1d19LrzrT2XUy3rZVFl09lYX0-sraRnneYslvTLpbRJCfrWpe_CC1KFT9W-UgpRez_qgru3nfp_t-l-g0j1pKx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554347141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Suárez, Juan Carlos ; Gelpud, Cristian ; Noriega, Jhon Eduar ; Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Juan Carlos ; Gelpud, Cristian ; Noriega, Jhon Eduar ; Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</creatorcontrib><description>The cultivation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is traditionally managed under shade because of its photosynthetic characteristics; however, its behavior can vary according to the genotype and environmental conditions where it is grown. In this sense, here, we explore the possible mechanisms of protection against radiation stress and how these mechanisms are affected by variation between cocoa genotypes. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of the radiation level (HPAR, 2100 ± 46 mol m−2 s−1; MPAR, 1150 ± 42 mol m−2 s−1; LPAR, 636 ± 40 mol m−2 s−1) on the water status and gas exchange in plants of different cocoa genotypes (CCN-51, ICS-1, ICS-95, LUKER-40 and LUKER-50), and the occurrence of photoinhibition of PSII (as a marker of photodamage), followed by a characterization of the protection mechanisms, including the dynamics of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. We found significant changes in the specific leaf area (SLA) and the water potential of the leaf (ΨL) due to the level of radiation, affecting the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), which generated dynamic photoinhibition processes (PIDyn). Cocoa genotypes showed the lowest Light-saturated maximum net carbon assimilation rate (Amax) in HPAR. Moreover, the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) was negatively affected in HPAR for most cocoa genotypes, indicating less RuBisCO activity except for the ICS-95 genotype. The ICS-95 showed the highest values of Vcmax and maximum rate of regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) controlled by electron transport (Jmax) under HPAR. Hence, our results show that some genotypes were acclimated to full sun conditions, which translated into greater carbon use efficiency due to the maximization of photosynthetic rates accompanied by energy dissipation mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11071422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Carbon ; Carboxylation ; Chlorophyll ; chlorophyll fluorescence ; Cocoa ; Crops ; Data collection ; Electron transport ; Energy dissipation ; Environmental conditions ; Gas exchange ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Genotypes ; irradiance ; Leaf area ; Leaves ; Light ; Photoinhibition ; Photosynthesis ; Photosynthetic pigments ; Photosystem II ; Physiology ; Pigments ; Radiation ; Radiation measurement ; Regeneration ; Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate ; Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase ; Theobroma cacao ; Water analysis ; Water potential</subject><ispartof>Agronomy (Basel), 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1422</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0978-1256 ; 0000-0003-1055-1159 ; 0000-0001-5928-1837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2554347141/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2554347141?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelpud, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noriega, Jhon Eduar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</creatorcontrib><title>How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level</title><title>Agronomy (Basel)</title><description>The cultivation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is traditionally managed under shade because of its photosynthetic characteristics; however, its behavior can vary according to the genotype and environmental conditions where it is grown. In this sense, here, we explore the possible mechanisms of protection against radiation stress and how these mechanisms are affected by variation between cocoa genotypes. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of the radiation level (HPAR, 2100 ± 46 mol m−2 s−1; MPAR, 1150 ± 42 mol m−2 s−1; LPAR, 636 ± 40 mol m−2 s−1) on the water status and gas exchange in plants of different cocoa genotypes (CCN-51, ICS-1, ICS-95, LUKER-40 and LUKER-50), and the occurrence of photoinhibition of PSII (as a marker of photodamage), followed by a characterization of the protection mechanisms, including the dynamics of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. We found significant changes in the specific leaf area (SLA) and the water potential of the leaf (ΨL) due to the level of radiation, affecting the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), which generated dynamic photoinhibition processes (PIDyn). Cocoa genotypes showed the lowest Light-saturated maximum net carbon assimilation rate (Amax) in HPAR. Moreover, the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) was negatively affected in HPAR for most cocoa genotypes, indicating less RuBisCO activity except for the ICS-95 genotype. The ICS-95 showed the highest values of Vcmax and maximum rate of regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) controlled by electron transport (Jmax) under HPAR. Hence, our results show that some genotypes were acclimated to full sun conditions, which translated into greater carbon use efficiency due to the maximization of photosynthetic rates accompanied by energy dissipation mechanisms.</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carboxylation</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>chlorophyll fluorescence</subject><subject>Cocoa</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Electron transport</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>irradiance</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Photoinhibition</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosynthetic pigments</subject><subject>Photosystem II</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pigments</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation measurement</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate</subject><subject>Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase</subject><subject>Theobroma cacao</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><issn>2073-4395</issn><issn>2073-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1rGzEQhpfSQEKae46CXutWX7uyTiWx82EwFEJKj2JWOxvLrHccSU7wD8n_rWKXUioGaZgZnlczU1WXgn9VyvJv8BRppM1eCG6ElvJDdSa5UROtbP3xH_-0ukhpzcuxQk25Oave7umVzYnNQ99jxDGzGXkCdocj5f0WE5sjDOw15BVbjD4iJOzYA3QBcqDxO7sai8GwTyEx6tkvyBjZAw6H9JcDd5fCCzIYO3YdyK9wE3xBzmizpbEoJgaZ5RWyJUJfrhccPlUnPQwJL_6859XP25vH2f1k-eNuMbtaTrwyNk-sxykv_bbSd70xAqVtpGgQjdXeyEZpo3rLa5C2bcXUKqE9SC0tdI1v2kadV4sjtyNYu20MG4h7RxDcIUDxyUHMwQ_oahDCdk1d19LrzrT2XUy3rZVFl09lYX0-sraRnneYslvTLpbRJCfrWpe_CC1KFT9W-UgpRez_qgru3nfp_t-l-g0j1pKx</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Suárez, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Gelpud, Cristian</creator><creator>Noriega, Jhon Eduar</creator><creator>Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0978-1256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-1159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-1837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level</title><author>Suárez, Juan Carlos ; Gelpud, Cristian ; Noriega, Jhon Eduar ; Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carboxylation</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>chlorophyll fluorescence</topic><topic>Cocoa</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Electron transport</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>irradiance</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Photoinhibition</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosynthetic pigments</topic><topic>Photosystem II</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pigments</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation measurement</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate</topic><topic>Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase</topic><topic>Theobroma cacao</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelpud, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noriega, Jhon Eduar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez, Juan Carlos</au><au>Gelpud, Cristian</au><au>Noriega, Jhon Eduar</au><au>Ortiz-Morea, Fausto Andrés</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1422</spage><pages>1422-</pages><issn>2073-4395</issn><eissn>2073-4395</eissn><abstract>The cultivation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is traditionally managed under shade because of its photosynthetic characteristics; however, its behavior can vary according to the genotype and environmental conditions where it is grown. In this sense, here, we explore the possible mechanisms of protection against radiation stress and how these mechanisms are affected by variation between cocoa genotypes. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of the radiation level (HPAR, 2100 ± 46 mol m−2 s−1; MPAR, 1150 ± 42 mol m−2 s−1; LPAR, 636 ± 40 mol m−2 s−1) on the water status and gas exchange in plants of different cocoa genotypes (CCN-51, ICS-1, ICS-95, LUKER-40 and LUKER-50), and the occurrence of photoinhibition of PSII (as a marker of photodamage), followed by a characterization of the protection mechanisms, including the dynamics of photosynthetic pigments and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. We found significant changes in the specific leaf area (SLA) and the water potential of the leaf (ΨL) due to the level of radiation, affecting the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), which generated dynamic photoinhibition processes (PIDyn). Cocoa genotypes showed the lowest Light-saturated maximum net carbon assimilation rate (Amax) in HPAR. Moreover, the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) was negatively affected in HPAR for most cocoa genotypes, indicating less RuBisCO activity except for the ICS-95 genotype. The ICS-95 showed the highest values of Vcmax and maximum rate of regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) controlled by electron transport (Jmax) under HPAR. Hence, our results show that some genotypes were acclimated to full sun conditions, which translated into greater carbon use efficiency due to the maximization of photosynthetic rates accompanied by energy dissipation mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agronomy11071422</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0978-1256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1055-1159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-1837</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4395
ispartof Agronomy (Basel), 2021-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1422
issn 2073-4395
2073-4395
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5a119d65552c4d7b9e2964bb9271e082
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Antioxidants
Carbon
Carboxylation
Chlorophyll
chlorophyll fluorescence
Cocoa
Crops
Data collection
Electron transport
Energy dissipation
Environmental conditions
Gas exchange
Genotype & phenotype
Genotypes
irradiance
Leaf area
Leaves
Light
Photoinhibition
Photosynthesis
Photosynthetic pigments
Photosystem II
Physiology
Pigments
Radiation
Radiation measurement
Regeneration
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate
Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase
Theobroma cacao
Water analysis
Water potential
title How Do Different Cocoa Genotypes Deal with Increased Radiation? An Analysis of Water Relation, Diffusive and Biochemical Components at the Leaf Level
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Do%20Different%20Cocoa%20Genotypes%20Deal%20with%20Increased%20Radiation?%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Water%20Relation,%20Diffusive%20and%20Biochemical%20Components%20at%20the%20Leaf%20Level&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20(Basel)&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez,%20Juan%20Carlos&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1422&rft.pages=1422-&rft.issn=2073-4395&rft.eissn=2073-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agronomy11071422&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2554347141%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9ce80142b2cdf771e296216ee794c7263473f905a29bb189314ca2429ad6c6b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554347141&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true