Loading…

A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football

Due to the unfortunate pandemic situation, the phenomena of home advantage and referee bias in sports have recently received a particular research attention, especially in association football. In this regard, several studies were conducted on the last portion of the 2019-20 season: the majority of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2022-07, Vol.10, p.e13681, Article e13681
Main Authors: Sors, Fabrizio, Grassi, Michele, Agostini, Tiziano, Murgia, Mauro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e13681
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 10
creator Sors, Fabrizio
Grassi, Michele
Agostini, Tiziano
Murgia, Mauro
description Due to the unfortunate pandemic situation, the phenomena of home advantage and referee bias in sports have recently received a particular research attention, especially in association football. In this regard, several studies were conducted on the last portion of the 2019-20 season: the majority of them suggests a reduction-but not the elimination-of the two phenomena, with some exceptions in which no reduction was found or, at the other extreme, the phenomena were not observed at all. The continuation of the pandemic made it possible to replicate the previous studies considering the complete 2020-21 season, thus with the important added value of having a fully balanced home/away schedule-and a higher number of matches-in the various leagues. In particular, the sample of the present study consisted of 3,898 matches from the first and second divisions of the UEFA top five ranked countries, that is, England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France. For the home advantage, the following variables were examined: distribution of matches outcomes and home advantage for points (also for previous seasons from the 2014-15 one); ball possession; total shots; shots on goal; and corner kicks. Instead, for he referee bias, the following variables were examined: fouls; yellow cards; red cards; penalty kicks; and extra time. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distribution of matches outcomes, and t-tests to compare home . away data for the other variables in the 2020-21 season; Bayesian and equivalence analyses were also conducted. The main results are as follows: (a) the distribution of matches outcomes in the 2020-21 season was significantly different from that of the last five complete seasons with spectators (Chi-square = 37.42, df = 2, < 0.001), with fewer home victories and more away victories; the resulting values of the home advantage for points were 54.95% for the 2020-21 season, and 59.36% for the previous seasons; (b) for the other home advantage variables, a statistically significant overall advantage for the home team emerged; nevertheless, the strength of the differences between home and away teams was generally small (0.09 < Cohen's < 0.17), and the corresponding means can be considered statistically equivalent for all variables but the total shots; (c) no statistically significant differences emerged between home and away teams for any of the referee bias variables. These findings demonstrate that the absence of spectators significantly reduced the home
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.13681
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5aafb28498a8418cab004608a969e81f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A709079137</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5aafb28498a8418cab004608a969e81f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A709079137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl-L1DAUxYso7rLuk-8SEESQWZO00yYvwrD4Z2HBF30ON-nNNEObjElmF7-Kn9Z0Zl1nxLaQy83vntCTU1UvGb3qOta93yLGzRWrW8GeVOectd1C1Ev59Kg-qy5T2tDyCN5SUT-vzuqlYKx859WvFTFh2o6YkSSEFDy5d3kgkDP6HrxBEjHl6Ex2wacCe-vilEge5p0R78DnuVsQvZsZEixJWzQZcoiFC2QIExLoZxLWpfJ9mbQYEYl2kIjzBFIKxsF-3oaQNYzji-qZhTHh5cN6UX3_9PHb9ZfF7dfPN9er24VZdnVeoNGMStlI0zQ1123LGq37VmjbcOzMsrecacPbpoW-RUtBtoi2511X91RbWl9UNwfdPsBGbaObIP5UAZzaN0JcK4jZmRHVEsBqLhopQDRMGNCUNsXToilRMFu0Phy0tjs9YW-w-ALjiejpjneDWoc7JXnLJOdF4O2DQAw_dsV5NblkcBzBY9glxVshqBAN7Qr6-h90E3bRF6tmquGSL5n8S62h_IDzNpRzzSyqVh2VtJOsnrWu_kOVt8fJldtF60r_ZODN0cCAMOYhhXGfgHQKvjuAJoaUyr0_msGomiOs9hFW-wgX-tWxf4_sn8DWvwHIK-86</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2684292519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Sors, Fabrizio ; Grassi, Michele ; Agostini, Tiziano ; Murgia, Mauro</creator><creatorcontrib>Sors, Fabrizio ; Grassi, Michele ; Agostini, Tiziano ; Murgia, Mauro</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the unfortunate pandemic situation, the phenomena of home advantage and referee bias in sports have recently received a particular research attention, especially in association football. In this regard, several studies were conducted on the last portion of the 2019-20 season: the majority of them suggests a reduction-but not the elimination-of the two phenomena, with some exceptions in which no reduction was found or, at the other extreme, the phenomena were not observed at all. The continuation of the pandemic made it possible to replicate the previous studies considering the complete 2020-21 season, thus with the important added value of having a fully balanced home/away schedule-and a higher number of matches-in the various leagues. In particular, the sample of the present study consisted of 3,898 matches from the first and second divisions of the UEFA top five ranked countries, that is, England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France. For the home advantage, the following variables were examined: distribution of matches outcomes and home advantage for points (also for previous seasons from the 2014-15 one); ball possession; total shots; shots on goal; and corner kicks. Instead, for he referee bias, the following variables were examined: fouls; yellow cards; red cards; penalty kicks; and extra time. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distribution of matches outcomes, and t-tests to compare home . away data for the other variables in the 2020-21 season; Bayesian and equivalence analyses were also conducted. The main results are as follows: (a) the distribution of matches outcomes in the 2020-21 season was significantly different from that of the last five complete seasons with spectators (Chi-square = 37.42, df = 2, &lt; 0.001), with fewer home victories and more away victories; the resulting values of the home advantage for points were 54.95% for the 2020-21 season, and 59.36% for the previous seasons; (b) for the other home advantage variables, a statistically significant overall advantage for the home team emerged; nevertheless, the strength of the differences between home and away teams was generally small (0.09 &lt; Cohen's &lt; 0.17), and the corresponding means can be considered statistically equivalent for all variables but the total shots; (c) no statistically significant differences emerged between home and away teams for any of the referee bias variables. These findings demonstrate that the absence of spectators significantly reduced the home advantage compared to previous seasons with spectators. A slight home advantage persisted in the 2020-21 season, probably due to other factors, namely, learning and travel, according to the model by Courneya &amp; Carron (1992). Conversely, the referee bias was not observed, suggesting that it mainly derives from the pressure normally exerted by spectators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13681</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35811811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Awards &amp; honors ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; Crowd ; Epidemics ; Football ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Officials ; Pandemics ; Professional football ; Psychiatry and Psychology ; Seasons ; Soccer ; Social pressure ; Sports Injury ; Sports Medicine ; Sports officiating ; Statistical analysis ; Support</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2022-07, Vol.10, p.e13681, Article e13681</ispartof><rights>2022 Sors et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 Sors et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Sors et al. 2022 Sors et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3803-1772 ; 0000-0002-8450-1157</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2684292519?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2684292519?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,38499,43878,44573,53774,53776,74163,74877</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35811811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sors, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostini, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murgia, Mauro</creatorcontrib><title>A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Due to the unfortunate pandemic situation, the phenomena of home advantage and referee bias in sports have recently received a particular research attention, especially in association football. In this regard, several studies were conducted on the last portion of the 2019-20 season: the majority of them suggests a reduction-but not the elimination-of the two phenomena, with some exceptions in which no reduction was found or, at the other extreme, the phenomena were not observed at all. The continuation of the pandemic made it possible to replicate the previous studies considering the complete 2020-21 season, thus with the important added value of having a fully balanced home/away schedule-and a higher number of matches-in the various leagues. In particular, the sample of the present study consisted of 3,898 matches from the first and second divisions of the UEFA top five ranked countries, that is, England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France. For the home advantage, the following variables were examined: distribution of matches outcomes and home advantage for points (also for previous seasons from the 2014-15 one); ball possession; total shots; shots on goal; and corner kicks. Instead, for he referee bias, the following variables were examined: fouls; yellow cards; red cards; penalty kicks; and extra time. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distribution of matches outcomes, and t-tests to compare home . away data for the other variables in the 2020-21 season; Bayesian and equivalence analyses were also conducted. The main results are as follows: (a) the distribution of matches outcomes in the 2020-21 season was significantly different from that of the last five complete seasons with spectators (Chi-square = 37.42, df = 2, &lt; 0.001), with fewer home victories and more away victories; the resulting values of the home advantage for points were 54.95% for the 2020-21 season, and 59.36% for the previous seasons; (b) for the other home advantage variables, a statistically significant overall advantage for the home team emerged; nevertheless, the strength of the differences between home and away teams was generally small (0.09 &lt; Cohen's &lt; 0.17), and the corresponding means can be considered statistically equivalent for all variables but the total shots; (c) no statistically significant differences emerged between home and away teams for any of the referee bias variables. These findings demonstrate that the absence of spectators significantly reduced the home advantage compared to previous seasons with spectators. A slight home advantage persisted in the 2020-21 season, probably due to other factors, namely, learning and travel, according to the model by Courneya &amp; Carron (1992). Conversely, the referee bias was not observed, suggesting that it mainly derives from the pressure normally exerted by spectators.</description><subject>Awards &amp; honors</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Crowd</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Football</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Officials</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Professional football</subject><subject>Psychiatry and Psychology</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Soccer</subject><subject>Social pressure</subject><subject>Sports Injury</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Sports officiating</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Support</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl-L1DAUxYso7rLuk-8SEESQWZO00yYvwrD4Z2HBF30ON-nNNEObjElmF7-Kn9Z0Zl1nxLaQy83vntCTU1UvGb3qOta93yLGzRWrW8GeVOectd1C1Ev59Kg-qy5T2tDyCN5SUT-vzuqlYKx859WvFTFh2o6YkSSEFDy5d3kgkDP6HrxBEjHl6Ex2wacCe-vilEge5p0R78DnuVsQvZsZEixJWzQZcoiFC2QIExLoZxLWpfJ9mbQYEYl2kIjzBFIKxsF-3oaQNYzji-qZhTHh5cN6UX3_9PHb9ZfF7dfPN9er24VZdnVeoNGMStlI0zQ1123LGq37VmjbcOzMsrecacPbpoW-RUtBtoi2511X91RbWl9UNwfdPsBGbaObIP5UAZzaN0JcK4jZmRHVEsBqLhopQDRMGNCUNsXToilRMFu0Phy0tjs9YW-w-ALjiejpjneDWoc7JXnLJOdF4O2DQAw_dsV5NblkcBzBY9glxVshqBAN7Qr6-h90E3bRF6tmquGSL5n8S62h_IDzNpRzzSyqVh2VtJOsnrWu_kOVt8fJldtF60r_ZODN0cCAMOYhhXGfgHQKvjuAJoaUyr0_msGomiOs9hFW-wgX-tWxf4_sn8DWvwHIK-86</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Sors, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Grassi, Michele</creator><creator>Agostini, Tiziano</creator><creator>Murgia, Mauro</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-1772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-1157</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football</title><author>Sors, Fabrizio ; Grassi, Michele ; Agostini, Tiziano ; Murgia, Mauro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Awards &amp; honors</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Crowd</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Football</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Officials</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Professional football</topic><topic>Psychiatry and Psychology</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Soccer</topic><topic>Social pressure</topic><topic>Sports Injury</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Sports officiating</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sors, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostini, Tiziano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murgia, Mauro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sors, Fabrizio</au><au>Grassi, Michele</au><au>Agostini, Tiziano</au><au>Murgia, Mauro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>e13681</spage><pages>e13681-</pages><artnum>e13681</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Due to the unfortunate pandemic situation, the phenomena of home advantage and referee bias in sports have recently received a particular research attention, especially in association football. In this regard, several studies were conducted on the last portion of the 2019-20 season: the majority of them suggests a reduction-but not the elimination-of the two phenomena, with some exceptions in which no reduction was found or, at the other extreme, the phenomena were not observed at all. The continuation of the pandemic made it possible to replicate the previous studies considering the complete 2020-21 season, thus with the important added value of having a fully balanced home/away schedule-and a higher number of matches-in the various leagues. In particular, the sample of the present study consisted of 3,898 matches from the first and second divisions of the UEFA top five ranked countries, that is, England, Spain, Italy, Germany, and France. For the home advantage, the following variables were examined: distribution of matches outcomes and home advantage for points (also for previous seasons from the 2014-15 one); ball possession; total shots; shots on goal; and corner kicks. Instead, for he referee bias, the following variables were examined: fouls; yellow cards; red cards; penalty kicks; and extra time. Chi-square tests were used to compare the distribution of matches outcomes, and t-tests to compare home . away data for the other variables in the 2020-21 season; Bayesian and equivalence analyses were also conducted. The main results are as follows: (a) the distribution of matches outcomes in the 2020-21 season was significantly different from that of the last five complete seasons with spectators (Chi-square = 37.42, df = 2, &lt; 0.001), with fewer home victories and more away victories; the resulting values of the home advantage for points were 54.95% for the 2020-21 season, and 59.36% for the previous seasons; (b) for the other home advantage variables, a statistically significant overall advantage for the home team emerged; nevertheless, the strength of the differences between home and away teams was generally small (0.09 &lt; Cohen's &lt; 0.17), and the corresponding means can be considered statistically equivalent for all variables but the total shots; (c) no statistically significant differences emerged between home and away teams for any of the referee bias variables. These findings demonstrate that the absence of spectators significantly reduced the home advantage compared to previous seasons with spectators. A slight home advantage persisted in the 2020-21 season, probably due to other factors, namely, learning and travel, according to the model by Courneya &amp; Carron (1992). Conversely, the referee bias was not observed, suggesting that it mainly derives from the pressure normally exerted by spectators.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>35811811</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.13681</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-1772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-1157</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2022-07, Vol.10, p.e13681, Article e13681
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5aafb28498a8418cab004608a969e81f
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Awards & honors
Bayesian analysis
Bias
Crowd
Epidemics
Football
Germany
Humans
Male
Officials
Pandemics
Professional football
Psychiatry and Psychology
Seasons
Soccer
Social pressure
Sports Injury
Sports Medicine
Sports officiating
Statistical analysis
Support
title A complete season with attendance restrictions confirms the relevant contribution of spectators to home advantage and referee bias in association football
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20complete%20season%20with%20attendance%20restrictions%20confirms%20the%20relevant%20contribution%20of%20spectators%20to%20home%20advantage%20and%20referee%20bias%20in%20association%20football&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Sors,%20Fabrizio&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=e13681&rft.pages=e13681-&rft.artnum=e13681&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.13681&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA709079137%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-ecb109949c4432b6614bbd68bf42e7c5df21bc2646ad6ef0a96eefd2773d0bf03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2684292519&rft_id=info:pmid/35811811&rft_galeid=A709079137&rfr_iscdi=true