A preventive integrated eHealth approach for individuals with a low socioeconomic position: protocol for a realist evaluation

• Published in: BMC public health 2024-10, Vol.24 (1), p.2700-14, Article 2700
• Main Authors: Israel, Adriana M C, van Lenthe, Frank J, Beenackers, Mariëlle A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Customization; Data collection; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated; EHealth; Health behavior; Health disparities; Health education; Health literacy; Humans; Intervention; Lifestyles; Living conditions; Low socioeconomic position; Netherlands; Participation; Population studies; Poverty; Preventive Health Services; Professionals; Program Evaluation; Qualitative analysis; Realist evaluation; Social Class; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; Telemedicine
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20113-8

Adoption of standalone eHealth tools is low among persons in lower socioeconomic groups. The preventive integrated eHealth approach combines blended care with an active and personal approach to facilitate access to local care, tailored to the needs of the participant. We describe the four step preventive integrated eHealth approach for individuals with a low socioeconomic position and the realist evaluation protocol of the intervention and implementation. The realist evaluation centers around the question, 'what works for whom in what circumstances and why'. The study population will consist of adult individuals with a low socioeconomic position, who participate in the preventive integrated eHealth approach in one of the participating locations in the Netherlands. The four-step intervention consists of: (1) a proactive invitation of participants by care professionals, (2) the use of an eHealth tool that produces a personalized health report, (3) a personal consultation with a care professional to discuss the personalized health report and set a goal to work on, and (4) active referral to local social and health care. An initial program theory theorized from literature and stakeholder involvement is presented. Qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis with participants (survey at zero, three and twelve months and focus groups at six months) and professionals (interviews at three months) will inform the realist evaluation and serves to test and refine the initial program theory. Our mixed-methods realist evaluation on the effect and implementation of a personal and active blended care approach will elucidate what elements trigger the mechanisms and responses of how individuals with a low socioeconomic position experience the preventive integrated eHealth approach. This will inform the way a preventative health check incorporating eHealth can be used to its full potential for low socioeconomic positioned groups to help close the digital divide and contribute to reduce health disparities.