Information Needs of Breast Cancer Patients: Theory-Generating Meta-Synthesis

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research 2020-07, Vol.22 (7), p.e17907
• Main Authors: Lu, Hongru, Xie, Juan, Gerido, Lynette Hammond, Cheng, Ying, Chen, Ya, Sun, Lizhu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology; Data analysis; Data collection; Demography; Etiology; Female; Grounded theory; Health literacy; Health services; Health Services - standards; Health status; Humans; Incentives; Information needs; Information seeking behavior; Medical diagnosis; Medical prognosis; Multimedia; Patients; Physical abnormalities; Qualitative Research; Quality of care; Research methodology; Review; Social networks; Systematic review; Welfare benefits
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/17907

Breast cancer has become one of the most frequently diagnosed carcinomas and the leading cause of cancer deaths. The substantial growth in the number of breast cancer patients has put great pressure on health services. Meanwhile, the information patients need has increased and become more complicated. Therefore, a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of their information needs is urgently needed to improve the quality of health care. However, previous studies related to the information needs of breast cancer patients have focused on different perspectives and have only contributed to individual results. A systematic review and synthesis of breast cancer patients' information needs is critical. This paper aims to systematically identify, evaluate, and synthesize existing primary qualitative research on the information needs of breast cancer patients. Web of Science, EBSCO, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched on February 12 and July 9, 2019, to collect relevant studies. A Google Scholar search, interpersonal network recommendations, and reference chaining were also conducted. Eligible studies included qualitative or mixed-methods studies focusing on the information needs (across the cancer continuum) of breast cancer patients or their social networks. Subsequently, a Critical Appraisals Skills Programme checklist was used to assess the quality of included research. The results, findings, and discussions were extracted. Data analysis was guided by the theory-generating meta-synthesis and grounded theory approach. Three themes, 19 categories, and 55 concepts emerged: (1) incentives (physical abnormality, inquiry from others, subjective norm, and problems during appointments); (2) types of information needs (prevention, etiology, diagnosis, clinical manifestation, treatment, prognosis, impact and resumption of normal life, scientific research, and social assistance); (3) moderating variables (attitudes, health literacy, demographic characteristics, disease status, as well as political and cultural environment). The studies revealed that the information needs of breast cancer patients were triggered by different incentives. Subsequently, the patients sought a variety of information among different stages of the cancer journey. Five types of variables were also found to moderate the formation of information needs. This study contributes to a thorough model of info