Loading…

Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study

Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC cancer 2019-11, Vol.19 (1), p.1158-15, Article 1158
Main Authors: Tesauro, Cinzia, Simonsen, Anne Katrine, Andersen, Marie Bech, Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe, Kristoffersen, Emil Laust, Algreen, Line, Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama, Andersen, Anne Bech, Jakobsen, Ann Katrine, Stougaard, Magnus, Gromov, Pavel, Knudsen, Birgitta R, Gromova, Irina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1158
container_title BMC cancer
container_volume 19
creator Tesauro, Cinzia
Simonsen, Anne Katrine
Andersen, Marie Bech
Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe
Kristoffersen, Emil Laust
Algreen, Line
Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama
Andersen, Anne Bech
Jakobsen, Ann Katrine
Stougaard, Magnus
Gromov, Pavel
Knudsen, Birgitta R
Gromova, Irina
description Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes. We evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of the TOP1 gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC. In all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation between TOP1 gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives. TOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12885-019-6371-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5bdd00634203464bab2f0dbccd74d249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607415036</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5bdd00634203464bab2f0dbccd74d249</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A607415036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl2L1DAULaK46-oP8EUKguBD13y1SX0QlsWPgQVB1-eQJrczGdpmTNLB-ffedcZ1C5KE3Nycc7j3coriJSWXlKrmXaJMqboitK0aLmlFHhXnVGDABJGPH8RnxbOUtoRQqYh6WpxxDLii6rwYbsMu-BRGiCZBuSqNzX7v86E0kysTTMmf3jmU1oy7HPIGrJ9K3F0EkzKmJwuxchD9HlxpYRjS-9KUNow7Ew3yoUx5dofnxZPeDAlenO6L4senj7fXX6qbr59X11c3lW1YnSuQzjYddbVQteOtVb1jpJXArAToLdR4rOo6KUAx5bhgreAc--SNJC0FflGsjroumK3eRT-aeNDBeP0nEeJam5i9HUDXnXOENKhBuGhEZzrWE9dZ66RwTLSo9eGotZu7EZyFKUczLESXP5Pf6HXY60YpIVuOAq9PAjH8nCFlvQ1znLB_zThTDRbO6n-otcGq_NQHFLOjT1ZfNUQKWmN3iLr8DwqXg9HbMEHvMb8gvF0QEJPhV16bOSW9-v5tiX3zALsBM-RNCsOcfZjSEkiPQBtDShH6-2lQou-MqY_G1GhMfWdMTZDz6uEY7xl_nch_A2K93YM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328632425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Tesauro, Cinzia ; Simonsen, Anne Katrine ; Andersen, Marie Bech ; Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe ; Kristoffersen, Emil Laust ; Algreen, Line ; Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama ; Andersen, Anne Bech ; Jakobsen, Ann Katrine ; Stougaard, Magnus ; Gromov, Pavel ; Knudsen, Birgitta R ; Gromova, Irina</creator><creatorcontrib>Tesauro, Cinzia ; Simonsen, Anne Katrine ; Andersen, Marie Bech ; Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe ; Kristoffersen, Emil Laust ; Algreen, Line ; Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama ; Andersen, Anne Bech ; Jakobsen, Ann Katrine ; Stougaard, Magnus ; Gromov, Pavel ; Knudsen, Birgitta R ; Gromova, Irina</creatorcontrib><description>Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes. We evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of the TOP1 gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC. In all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation between TOP1 gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives. TOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6371-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31783818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology ; Biochemistry ; Breast cancer ; Breast cancer cell lines ; Breast Neoplasms - enzymology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast tumor subtypes ; Breast tumors ; Camptothecin ; Camptothecin - pharmacology ; Camptothecin sensivity ; Cancer research ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Cell death ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Cell Proliferation - drug effects ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical trials ; Colorectal cancer ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative literature ; Copy number ; Cytotoxicity ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA damage ; DNA topoisomerase ; DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - genetics ; DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - metabolism ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm - drug effects ; Enzymatic activity ; Enzymes ; Epidermal growth factor ; ErbB-2 protein ; Female ; Gene amplification ; Gene Dosage ; Gene Expression ; Genes ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Medical research ; Morphology ; Patients ; Phosphodiesterase ; Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases - metabolism ; Protein expression ; Proteins ; Statistical analysis ; Top1 gene ; Topoisomerase I ; Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>BMC cancer, 2019-11, Vol.19 (1), p.1158-15, Article 1158</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3484-3802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884793/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2328632425?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31783818$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tesauro, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Anne Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Marie Bech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Emil Laust</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algreen, Line</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Anne Bech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Ann Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stougaard, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gromov, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Birgitta R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gromova, Irina</creatorcontrib><title>Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study</title><title>BMC cancer</title><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><description>Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes. We evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of the TOP1 gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC. In all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation between TOP1 gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives. TOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast cancer cell lines</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - enzymology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast tumor subtypes</subject><subject>Breast tumors</subject><subject>Camptothecin</subject><subject>Camptothecin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Camptothecin sensivity</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative literature</subject><subject>Copy number</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA topoisomerase</subject><subject>DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - metabolism</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm - drug effects</subject><subject>Enzymatic activity</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene amplification</subject><subject>Gene Dosage</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phosphodiesterase</subject><subject>Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases - metabolism</subject><subject>Protein expression</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Top1 gene</subject><subject>Topoisomerase I</subject><subject>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1471-2407</issn><issn>1471-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl2L1DAULaK46-oP8EUKguBD13y1SX0QlsWPgQVB1-eQJrczGdpmTNLB-ffedcZ1C5KE3Nycc7j3coriJSWXlKrmXaJMqboitK0aLmlFHhXnVGDABJGPH8RnxbOUtoRQqYh6WpxxDLii6rwYbsMu-BRGiCZBuSqNzX7v86E0kysTTMmf3jmU1oy7HPIGrJ9K3F0EkzKmJwuxchD9HlxpYRjS-9KUNow7Ew3yoUx5dofnxZPeDAlenO6L4senj7fXX6qbr59X11c3lW1YnSuQzjYddbVQteOtVb1jpJXArAToLdR4rOo6KUAx5bhgreAc--SNJC0FflGsjroumK3eRT-aeNDBeP0nEeJam5i9HUDXnXOENKhBuGhEZzrWE9dZ66RwTLSo9eGotZu7EZyFKUczLESXP5Pf6HXY60YpIVuOAq9PAjH8nCFlvQ1znLB_zThTDRbO6n-otcGq_NQHFLOjT1ZfNUQKWmN3iLr8DwqXg9HbMEHvMb8gvF0QEJPhV16bOSW9-v5tiX3zALsBM-RNCsOcfZjSEkiPQBtDShH6-2lQou-MqY_G1GhMfWdMTZDz6uEY7xl_nch_A2K93YM</recordid><startdate>20191129</startdate><enddate>20191129</enddate><creator>Tesauro, Cinzia</creator><creator>Simonsen, Anne Katrine</creator><creator>Andersen, Marie Bech</creator><creator>Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe</creator><creator>Kristoffersen, Emil Laust</creator><creator>Algreen, Line</creator><creator>Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama</creator><creator>Andersen, Anne Bech</creator><creator>Jakobsen, Ann Katrine</creator><creator>Stougaard, Magnus</creator><creator>Gromov, Pavel</creator><creator>Knudsen, Birgitta R</creator><creator>Gromova, Irina</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-3802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191129</creationdate><title>Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study</title><author>Tesauro, Cinzia ; Simonsen, Anne Katrine ; Andersen, Marie Bech ; Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe ; Kristoffersen, Emil Laust ; Algreen, Line ; Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama ; Andersen, Anne Bech ; Jakobsen, Ann Katrine ; Stougaard, Magnus ; Gromov, Pavel ; Knudsen, Birgitta R ; Gromova, Irina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast cancer cell lines</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - enzymology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast tumor subtypes</topic><topic>Breast tumors</topic><topic>Camptothecin</topic><topic>Camptothecin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Camptothecin sensivity</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation - drug effects</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative literature</topic><topic>Copy number</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA topoisomerase</topic><topic>DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - metabolism</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Neoplasm - drug effects</topic><topic>Enzymatic activity</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene amplification</topic><topic>Gene Dosage</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phosphodiesterase</topic><topic>Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases - metabolism</topic><topic>Protein expression</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Top1 gene</topic><topic>Topoisomerase I</topic><topic>Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tesauro, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Anne Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Marie Bech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristoffersen, Emil Laust</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Algreen, Line</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Anne Bech</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Ann Katrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stougaard, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gromov, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Birgitta R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gromova, Irina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tesauro, Cinzia</au><au>Simonsen, Anne Katrine</au><au>Andersen, Marie Bech</au><au>Petersen, Kamilla Wandsoe</au><au>Kristoffersen, Emil Laust</au><au>Algreen, Line</au><au>Hansen, Noriko Yokoyama</au><au>Andersen, Anne Bech</au><au>Jakobsen, Ann Katrine</au><au>Stougaard, Magnus</au><au>Gromov, Pavel</au><au>Knudsen, Birgitta R</au><au>Gromova, Irina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study</atitle><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><date>2019-11-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1158-15</pages><artnum>1158</artnum><issn>1471-2407</issn><eissn>1471-2407</eissn><abstract>Camptothecin (CPT) and its derivatives are currently used as second- or third-line treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC). These drugs convert nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) to a cell poison with the potential to damage DNA by increasing the half-life of TOP1-DNA cleavage complexes (TOP1cc), ultimately resulting in cell death. In small and non-randomized trials for BC, researchers have observed extensive variation in CPT response rates, ranging from 14 to 64%. This variability may be due to the absence of reliable selective parameters for patient stratification. BC cell lines may serve as feasible models for generation of functional criteria that may be used to predict drug sensitivity for patient stratification and, thus, lead to more appropriate applications of CPT in clinical trials. However, no study published to date has included a comparison of multiple relevant parameters and CPT response across cell lines corresponding to specific BC subtypes. We evaluated the levels and possible associations of seven parameters including the status of the TOP1 gene (i.e. amplification), TOP1 protein expression level, TOP1 activity and CPT susceptibility, activity of the tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), the cellular CPT response and the cellular growth rate across a representative panel of BC cell lines, which exemplifies three major BC subtypes: Luminal, HER2 and TNBC. In all BC cell lines analyzed (without regard to subtype classification), we observed a significant overall correlation between growth rate and CPT response. In cell lines derived from Luminal and HER2 subtypes, we observed a correlation between TOP1 gene copy number, TOP1 activity, and CPT response, although the data were too limited for statistical analyses. In cell lines representing Luminal and TNBC subtypes, we observed a direct correlation between TOP1 protein abundancy and levels of enzymatic activity. In all three subtypes (Luminal, HER2, and TNBC), TOP1 exhibits approximately the same susceptibility to CPT. Of the three subtypes examined, the TNBC-like cell lines exhibited the highest CPT sensitivity and were characterized by the fastest growth rate. This indicates that breast tumors belonging to the TNBC subtype, may benefit from treatment with CPT derivatives. TOP1 activity is not a marker for CPT sensitivity in breast cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>31783818</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12885-019-6371-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-3802</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2407
ispartof BMC cancer, 2019-11, Vol.19 (1), p.1158-15, Article 1158
issn 1471-2407
1471-2407
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5bdd00634203464bab2f0dbccd74d249
source Open Access: PubMed Central; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacology
Biochemistry
Breast cancer
Breast cancer cell lines
Breast Neoplasms - enzymology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast tumor subtypes
Breast tumors
Camptothecin
Camptothecin - pharmacology
Camptothecin sensivity
Cancer research
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Cell death
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Proliferation - drug effects
Cell Survival - drug effects
Chemotherapy
Clinical trials
Colorectal cancer
Comparative analysis
Comparative literature
Copy number
Cytotoxicity
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA damage
DNA topoisomerase
DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - genetics
DNA Topoisomerases, Type I - metabolism
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm - drug effects
Enzymatic activity
Enzymes
Epidermal growth factor
ErbB-2 protein
Female
Gene amplification
Gene Dosage
Gene Expression
Genes
Growth rate
Humans
Medical research
Morphology
Patients
Phosphodiesterase
Phosphoric Diester Hydrolases - metabolism
Protein expression
Proteins
Statistical analysis
Top1 gene
Topoisomerase I
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors - pharmacology
Tumors
title Topoisomerase I activity and sensitivity to camptothecin in breast cancer-derived cells: a comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topoisomerase%20I%20activity%20and%20sensitivity%20to%20camptothecin%20in%20breast%20cancer-derived%20cells:%20a%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20cancer&rft.au=Tesauro,%20Cinzia&rft.date=2019-11-29&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1158-15&rft.artnum=1158&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12885-019-6371-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA607415036%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-e7dc6b1d5485d39c8fd2097e2c7eefce5fcec8bb74e828d3429433240367091e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328632425&rft_id=info:pmid/31783818&rft_galeid=A607415036&rfr_iscdi=true