Geospatial Modeling Based-Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Flash Flood Susceptibility Zonation in an Arid Area

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2023-05, Vol.15 (10), p.2561
• Main Authors: Shawky, Mohamed, Hassan, Quazi K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: AHP; Algorithms; Analytic hierarchy process; Arid regions; Arid zones; Climate change; Coastal zone; Datasets; Decision making; Drainage; Drainage density; Drainage patterns; Egypt; Environmental risk; Flash floods; Flood hazards; Flood mapping; Flood predictions; Floods; Geographic information systems; Geology; Geospatial data; Hazard identification; Hazard mitigation; Hierarchies; Landforms; Literature reviews; Machine learning; Multiple criteria decision making; Multiple criterion; NASA Giovanni web tool; PCA; Principal components analysis; Rain and rainfall; Rainfall; Remote sensing; Risk; Ruggedness; Satellites; Saudi Arabia; Sinai; Support vector machines; Sustainable development; Tunisia; Waterfront development; Watersheds; Zonation
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs15102561

Identifying areas susceptible to flash flood hazards is essential to mitigating their negative impacts, particularly in arid regions. For example, in southeastern Sinai, the Egyptian government seeks to develop its coastal areas along the Gulf of Aqaba to maximize its national economy while preserving sustainable development standards. The current study aims to map and predict flash flood prone areas utilizing a spatial analytic hierarchy process (AHP) that integrates GIS capabilities, remote sensing datasets, the NASA Giovanni web tool application, and principal component analysis (PCA). Nineteen flash flood triggering parameters were initially considered for developing the susceptibility model by conducting a detailed literature review and using our experiences in the flash food studies. Next, the PCA algorithm was utilized to reduce the subjective nature of the researchers’ judgments in selecting flash flood triggering factors. By reducing the dimensionality of the data, we eliminated ten explanatory variables, and only nine relatively less correlated factors were retained, which prevented the creation of an ill-structured model. Finally, the AHP method was utilized to determine the relative weights of the nine spatial factors based on their significance in triggering flash floods. The resulting weights were as follows: rainfall (RF = 0.310), slope (S = 0.221), drainage density (DD = 0.158), geology (G = 0.107), height above nearest drainage network (HAND = 0.074), landforms (LF = 0.051), Melton ruggedness number (MRN = 0.035), plan curvature (PnC = 0.022), and stream power index (SPI = 0.022). The current research proved that AHP, among the most dependable methods for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), can effectively classify the degree of flash flood risk in ungauged arid areas. The study found that 59.2% of the area assessed was at very low and low risk of a flash flood, 21% was at very high and high risk, and 19.8% was at moderate risk. Using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) as a statistical evaluation metric, the GIS-based AHP model developed demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, achieving a score of 91.6%.