Loading…

Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4

Nowadays, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are widely deployed in communication areas due to their ease of implementation, dynamic self-organization, and cost-effectiveness. The design of routing protocols is critical for ensuring the performance and reliability of WMNs. Although there have been numero...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Telecom (Basel) 2024-10, Vol.5 (4), p.1008-1020
Main Authors: Turlykozhayeva, Dana, Temesheva, Symbat, Ussipov, Nurzhan, Bolysbay, Aslan, Akhmetali, Almat, Akhtanov, Sayat, Tang, Xiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1731-1b1ba0d83929a268ac03c6c588249c31081725b3c738aa0451ba5810c87ccfea3
container_end_page 1020
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1008
container_title Telecom (Basel)
container_volume 5
creator Turlykozhayeva, Dana
Temesheva, Symbat
Ussipov, Nurzhan
Bolysbay, Aslan
Akhmetali, Almat
Akhtanov, Sayat
Tang, Xiao
description Nowadays, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are widely deployed in communication areas due to their ease of implementation, dynamic self-organization, and cost-effectiveness. The design of routing protocols is critical for ensuring the performance and reliability of WMNs. Although there have been numerous experimental works on WMNs in the past decade, only a few of them have been tested in real-world scenarios. This article presents a comparative analysis of three proactive routing protocols, OLSR, BATMAN, and Babel, using Raspberry Pi 4 devices. The evaluation, conducted at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, covers both indoor and outdoor scenarios, focusing on key metrics such as bandwidth, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and jitter. In outdoor scenarios, OLSR achieved the highest bandwidth at 2.9 Mbps, while BATMAN and Babel lagged. Indoor tests revealed that Babel initially outperformed with the highest bandwidth of 57.19 Mb/s but suffered from scalability issues, while BATMAN and OLSR exhibited significant declines in performance as network size increased. For PDR, BATMAN performed best with a decline from 100% to 42.8%, followed by OLSR with a moderate drop, and Babel with the greatest decrease. For jitter, OLSR showed the most stable performance, increasing from 0.281 ms to 2.58 ms at eleven nodes, BATMAN exhibited moderate increases, and Babel experienced the highest rise.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/telecom5040051
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c09167bb4634f03b8f23d6ab7dabb6b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c09167bb4634f03b8f23d6ab7dabb6b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3149762397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1731-1b1ba0d83929a268ac03c6c588249c31081725b3c738aa0451ba5810c87ccfea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxYMoWGqvnhc8p-5XspujlKqFqkUsHpfZzaZuTbNxN1X735taET3NzOPHmxlekpwTPGaswJedra3xmwxzjDNylAxoLljaD-T4T3-ajGJcY4ypKHgm6SBpp5-tDW5jmw5qtLCh8mEDjbFo4jctBBd9g3yFFsGD6dy7RY9-27lmtVc6b3wdkWvQswv9ATGiOxtf0L3tPnx4Rcu4Bx8httqGsEMLh_hZclJBHe3opw6T5fX0aXKbzh9uZpOreWqIYCQlmmjApWQFLYDmEgxmJjeZlJQXhhEsiaCZZkYwCYB51uOZJNhIYUxlgQ2T2cG39LBWbf8ihJ3y4NS34MNKQeicqa3KDC5ILrTmOeMVZlpWlJU5aFGC1rnuvS4OXm3wb1sbO7X229D05ytGeCFyygrRU-MDZYKPMdjqdyvBah-S-h8S-wI65oZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149762397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Turlykozhayeva, Dana ; Temesheva, Symbat ; Ussipov, Nurzhan ; Bolysbay, Aslan ; Akhmetali, Almat ; Akhtanov, Sayat ; Tang, Xiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Turlykozhayeva, Dana ; Temesheva, Symbat ; Ussipov, Nurzhan ; Bolysbay, Aslan ; Akhmetali, Almat ; Akhtanov, Sayat ; Tang, Xiao</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are widely deployed in communication areas due to their ease of implementation, dynamic self-organization, and cost-effectiveness. The design of routing protocols is critical for ensuring the performance and reliability of WMNs. Although there have been numerous experimental works on WMNs in the past decade, only a few of them have been tested in real-world scenarios. This article presents a comparative analysis of three proactive routing protocols, OLSR, BATMAN, and Babel, using Raspberry Pi 4 devices. The evaluation, conducted at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, covers both indoor and outdoor scenarios, focusing on key metrics such as bandwidth, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and jitter. In outdoor scenarios, OLSR achieved the highest bandwidth at 2.9 Mbps, while BATMAN and Babel lagged. Indoor tests revealed that Babel initially outperformed with the highest bandwidth of 57.19 Mb/s but suffered from scalability issues, while BATMAN and OLSR exhibited significant declines in performance as network size increased. For PDR, BATMAN performed best with a decline from 100% to 42.8%, followed by OLSR with a moderate drop, and Babel with the greatest decrease. For jitter, OLSR showed the most stable performance, increasing from 0.281 ms to 2.58 ms at eleven nodes, BATMAN exhibited moderate increases, and Babel experienced the highest rise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2673-4001</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2673-4001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/telecom5040051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Babel ; Bandwidths ; BATMAN ; Communication ; Cost effectiveness ; Neighborhoods ; OLSR ; Performance evaluation ; proactive routing protocols ; Protocol ; Raspberry Pi 4 ; Routing (telecommunications) ; Vibration ; Wireless networks ; WMN</subject><ispartof>Telecom (Basel), 2024-10, Vol.5 (4), p.1008-1020</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1731-1b1ba0d83929a268ac03c6c588249c31081725b3c738aa0451ba5810c87ccfea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8971-5413 ; 0000-0002-9705-8000 ; 0000-0002-2512-3280 ; 0009-0007-5171-8767 ; 0009-0005-7254-524X ; 0009-0000-2795-9586 ; 0000-0002-7326-9196</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149762397/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149762397?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turlykozhayeva, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temesheva, Symbat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ussipov, Nurzhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolysbay, Aslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhmetali, Almat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtanov, Sayat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiao</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4</title><title>Telecom (Basel)</title><description>Nowadays, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are widely deployed in communication areas due to their ease of implementation, dynamic self-organization, and cost-effectiveness. The design of routing protocols is critical for ensuring the performance and reliability of WMNs. Although there have been numerous experimental works on WMNs in the past decade, only a few of them have been tested in real-world scenarios. This article presents a comparative analysis of three proactive routing protocols, OLSR, BATMAN, and Babel, using Raspberry Pi 4 devices. The evaluation, conducted at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, covers both indoor and outdoor scenarios, focusing on key metrics such as bandwidth, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and jitter. In outdoor scenarios, OLSR achieved the highest bandwidth at 2.9 Mbps, while BATMAN and Babel lagged. Indoor tests revealed that Babel initially outperformed with the highest bandwidth of 57.19 Mb/s but suffered from scalability issues, while BATMAN and OLSR exhibited significant declines in performance as network size increased. For PDR, BATMAN performed best with a decline from 100% to 42.8%, followed by OLSR with a moderate drop, and Babel with the greatest decrease. For jitter, OLSR showed the most stable performance, increasing from 0.281 ms to 2.58 ms at eleven nodes, BATMAN exhibited moderate increases, and Babel experienced the highest rise.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Babel</subject><subject>Bandwidths</subject><subject>BATMAN</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>OLSR</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>proactive routing protocols</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Raspberry Pi 4</subject><subject>Routing (telecommunications)</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><subject>WMN</subject><issn>2673-4001</issn><issn>2673-4001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxYMoWGqvnhc8p-5XspujlKqFqkUsHpfZzaZuTbNxN1X735taET3NzOPHmxlekpwTPGaswJedra3xmwxzjDNylAxoLljaD-T4T3-ajGJcY4ypKHgm6SBpp5-tDW5jmw5qtLCh8mEDjbFo4jctBBd9g3yFFsGD6dy7RY9-27lmtVc6b3wdkWvQswv9ATGiOxtf0L3tPnx4Rcu4Bx8httqGsEMLh_hZclJBHe3opw6T5fX0aXKbzh9uZpOreWqIYCQlmmjApWQFLYDmEgxmJjeZlJQXhhEsiaCZZkYwCYB51uOZJNhIYUxlgQ2T2cG39LBWbf8ihJ3y4NS34MNKQeicqa3KDC5ILrTmOeMVZlpWlJU5aFGC1rnuvS4OXm3wb1sbO7X229D05ytGeCFyygrRU-MDZYKPMdjqdyvBah-S-h8S-wI65oZE</recordid><startdate>20241010</startdate><enddate>20241010</enddate><creator>Turlykozhayeva, Dana</creator><creator>Temesheva, Symbat</creator><creator>Ussipov, Nurzhan</creator><creator>Bolysbay, Aslan</creator><creator>Akhmetali, Almat</creator><creator>Akhtanov, Sayat</creator><creator>Tang, Xiao</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-5413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-8000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-3280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5171-8767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7254-524X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2795-9586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7326-9196</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241010</creationdate><title>Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4</title><author>Turlykozhayeva, Dana ; Temesheva, Symbat ; Ussipov, Nurzhan ; Bolysbay, Aslan ; Akhmetali, Almat ; Akhtanov, Sayat ; Tang, Xiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1731-1b1ba0d83929a268ac03c6c588249c31081725b3c738aa0451ba5810c87ccfea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Babel</topic><topic>Bandwidths</topic><topic>BATMAN</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>OLSR</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>proactive routing protocols</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Raspberry Pi 4</topic><topic>Routing (telecommunications)</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><topic>WMN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turlykozhayeva, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Temesheva, Symbat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ussipov, Nurzhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolysbay, Aslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhmetali, Almat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtanov, Sayat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Xiao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Telecom (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turlykozhayeva, Dana</au><au>Temesheva, Symbat</au><au>Ussipov, Nurzhan</au><au>Bolysbay, Aslan</au><au>Akhmetali, Almat</au><au>Akhtanov, Sayat</au><au>Tang, Xiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4</atitle><jtitle>Telecom (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-10-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1008</spage><epage>1020</epage><pages>1008-1020</pages><issn>2673-4001</issn><eissn>2673-4001</eissn><abstract>Nowadays, Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are widely deployed in communication areas due to their ease of implementation, dynamic self-organization, and cost-effectiveness. The design of routing protocols is critical for ensuring the performance and reliability of WMNs. Although there have been numerous experimental works on WMNs in the past decade, only a few of them have been tested in real-world scenarios. This article presents a comparative analysis of three proactive routing protocols, OLSR, BATMAN, and Babel, using Raspberry Pi 4 devices. The evaluation, conducted at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, covers both indoor and outdoor scenarios, focusing on key metrics such as bandwidth, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and jitter. In outdoor scenarios, OLSR achieved the highest bandwidth at 2.9 Mbps, while BATMAN and Babel lagged. Indoor tests revealed that Babel initially outperformed with the highest bandwidth of 57.19 Mb/s but suffered from scalability issues, while BATMAN and OLSR exhibited significant declines in performance as network size increased. For PDR, BATMAN performed best with a decline from 100% to 42.8%, followed by OLSR with a moderate drop, and Babel with the greatest decrease. For jitter, OLSR showed the most stable performance, increasing from 0.281 ms to 2.58 ms at eleven nodes, BATMAN exhibited moderate increases, and Babel experienced the highest rise.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/telecom5040051</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-5413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9705-8000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2512-3280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5171-8767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7254-524X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2795-9586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7326-9196</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2673-4001
ispartof Telecom (Basel), 2024-10, Vol.5 (4), p.1008-1020
issn 2673-4001
2673-4001
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c09167bb4634f03b8f23d6ab7dabb6b
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Algorithms
Babel
Bandwidths
BATMAN
Communication
Cost effectiveness
Neighborhoods
OLSR
Performance evaluation
proactive routing protocols
Protocol
Raspberry Pi 4
Routing (telecommunications)
Vibration
Wireless networks
WMN
title Experimental Performance Comparison of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Mesh Network Using Raspberry Pi 4
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A29%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Performance%20Comparison%20of%20Proactive%20Routing%20Protocols%20in%20Wireless%20Mesh%20Network%20Using%20Raspberry%20Pi%204&rft.jtitle=Telecom%20(Basel)&rft.au=Turlykozhayeva,%20Dana&rft.date=2024-10-10&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1008&rft.epage=1020&rft.pages=1008-1020&rft.issn=2673-4001&rft.eissn=2673-4001&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/telecom5040051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3149762397%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1731-1b1ba0d83929a268ac03c6c588249c31081725b3c738aa0451ba5810c87ccfea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149762397&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true