Loading…
Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Hysterectomy is a widely performed surgery and neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine provides superior quality of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent problem with intrathecal morphine use. Although palonosetron is effective for prevention of PONV after general a...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC anesthesiology 2019-08, Vol.19 (1), p.159-159, Article 159 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83 |
container_end_page | 159 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | BMC anesthesiology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Campos, Guilherme Oliveira de Jesus Martins, Marcelo Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios Lessa, Caio Nogueira de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana Alves, Rodrigo Leal Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro |
description | Hysterectomy is a widely performed surgery and neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine provides superior quality of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent problem with intrathecal morphine use. Although palonosetron is effective for prevention of PONV after general anesthesia, its efficacy after neuraxial anesthesia has not been established. This study was conducted to compare the use of palonosetron with ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis in patients at a high risk of PONV during total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine.
This prospective, randomized double-blind study conducted at São Rafael Hospital involved 140 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II women who underwent TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and who had at least 3 risk factors for PONV based on Apfel's simplified score. The patients were randomized into two groups: one received palonosetron whereas the other received ondansetron. All patients received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, as well as dexamethasone plus palonosetron or ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of PONV, incidence of early- and late-onset nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, and use of rescue antiemetics were recorded.
The overall incidence of PONV was 42.9% in the palonosetron group and 52.9% in the ondansetron group (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed in the incidence of early- and late-onset nausea or early-onset vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of late-onset vomiting was significantly lower in the palonosetron group.
Palonosetron exhibited efficacy similar to that of ondansetron for reducing the overall incidence of PONV after TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine; however, palonosetron reduced the incidence of late-onset vomiting significantly better than ondansetron.
RBR-4gnm8n ( ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ), date of registration: August 18, 2014. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12871-019-0830-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c233012f4b946608a162e9c9450760c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A597048184</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c233012f4b946608a162e9c9450760c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A597048184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIloUfwAVZ4sKBFH8kccwBqar4qFQJDnC2HNvZdeXYi-0sWv4gf4tJd6m6EsohkzfvvcyMXlW9JPiCkL57lwntOakxETXuGa75o-qcNIBQ2rLHD-qz6lnOtxgT3mP2tDpjpKGk4-K8-vNN-RhitiXFgHY25TmjGIwKR2iMCW2T3dlQHHzGEQU1Z6uQCgbt4uSKC2ukxmITKrEoj9RgAA5QbfYZYKtLnPZoDgYoeXvXUcHmsrHZKfTLlQ1yoSQFgIbeFNN244J9jxQycR68rQfvgnmLEvwTrH9bg3QERfQeypKc8s-rJ6Py2b44vlfVj08fv199qW--fr6-urypdctoqQfbUTbghg-taMXIdKM1wx03HA8cM8560TBF-ci5EERjxTGxmtlhbLghQ89W1fXB10R1K7fJTSrtZVRO3gExraVKxWlvZaspY5jQsRlE03W4V6SjVmjRtJh3WIPXh4PXdh4ma7RdjuBPTE87wW3kOu5k14metcswb44GKf6c4aJycllb7-G8cc6SUr6siWGzVfX6QF0rGM2FMYKjXujyshUcNz3pG2Bd_IcFj7GTg5Pb0QF-IiAHgU4x52TH--kJlktG5SGjEjIql4xKDppXD9e-V_wLJfsLnj_m0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2275959070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira ; de Jesus Martins, Marcelo ; Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento ; de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios ; Lessa, Caio Nogueira ; de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes ; de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana ; Alves, Rodrigo Leal ; Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira ; de Jesus Martins, Marcelo ; Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento ; de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios ; Lessa, Caio Nogueira ; de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes ; de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana ; Alves, Rodrigo Leal ; Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><description>Hysterectomy is a widely performed surgery and neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine provides superior quality of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent problem with intrathecal morphine use. Although palonosetron is effective for prevention of PONV after general anesthesia, its efficacy after neuraxial anesthesia has not been established. This study was conducted to compare the use of palonosetron with ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis in patients at a high risk of PONV during total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine.
This prospective, randomized double-blind study conducted at São Rafael Hospital involved 140 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II women who underwent TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and who had at least 3 risk factors for PONV based on Apfel's simplified score. The patients were randomized into two groups: one received palonosetron whereas the other received ondansetron. All patients received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, as well as dexamethasone plus palonosetron or ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of PONV, incidence of early- and late-onset nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, and use of rescue antiemetics were recorded.
The overall incidence of PONV was 42.9% in the palonosetron group and 52.9% in the ondansetron group (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed in the incidence of early- and late-onset nausea or early-onset vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of late-onset vomiting was significantly lower in the palonosetron group.
Palonosetron exhibited efficacy similar to that of ondansetron for reducing the overall incidence of PONV after TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine; however, palonosetron reduced the incidence of late-onset vomiting significantly better than ondansetron.
RBR-4gnm8n ( ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ), date of registration: August 18, 2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0830-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31421679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal surgery ; Anesthesia ; Antiemetics ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Dexamethasone ; Dosage and administration ; Gastrointestinal agents ; Glucocorticoids ; Hysterectomy ; Medical societies ; Methods ; Morphine ; Nausea ; Nerve block ; Ondansetron ; Palonosetron ; Postoperative nausea and vomiting ; Prevention ; Professional associations ; Prophylaxis ; Spinal anesthesia ; Spine ; Surgery ; Vomiting ; Women's health</subject><ispartof>BMC anesthesiology, 2019-08, Vol.19 (1), p.159-159, Article 159</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6308-0314</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698358/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698358/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31421679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Martins, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessa, Caio Nogueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Rodrigo Leal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><title>Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial</title><title>BMC anesthesiology</title><addtitle>BMC Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>Hysterectomy is a widely performed surgery and neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine provides superior quality of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent problem with intrathecal morphine use. Although palonosetron is effective for prevention of PONV after general anesthesia, its efficacy after neuraxial anesthesia has not been established. This study was conducted to compare the use of palonosetron with ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis in patients at a high risk of PONV during total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine.
This prospective, randomized double-blind study conducted at São Rafael Hospital involved 140 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II women who underwent TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and who had at least 3 risk factors for PONV based on Apfel's simplified score. The patients were randomized into two groups: one received palonosetron whereas the other received ondansetron. All patients received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, as well as dexamethasone plus palonosetron or ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of PONV, incidence of early- and late-onset nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, and use of rescue antiemetics were recorded.
The overall incidence of PONV was 42.9% in the palonosetron group and 52.9% in the ondansetron group (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed in the incidence of early- and late-onset nausea or early-onset vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of late-onset vomiting was significantly lower in the palonosetron group.
Palonosetron exhibited efficacy similar to that of ondansetron for reducing the overall incidence of PONV after TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine; however, palonosetron reduced the incidence of late-onset vomiting significantly better than ondansetron.
RBR-4gnm8n ( ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ), date of registration: August 18, 2014.</description><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Antiemetics</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dexamethasone</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal agents</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Medical societies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Nerve block</subject><subject>Ondansetron</subject><subject>Palonosetron</subject><subject>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Professional associations</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Spinal anesthesia</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><subject>Women's health</subject><issn>1471-2253</issn><issn>1471-2253</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIloUfwAVZ4sKBFH8kccwBqar4qFQJDnC2HNvZdeXYi-0sWv4gf4tJd6m6EsohkzfvvcyMXlW9JPiCkL57lwntOakxETXuGa75o-qcNIBQ2rLHD-qz6lnOtxgT3mP2tDpjpKGk4-K8-vNN-RhitiXFgHY25TmjGIwKR2iMCW2T3dlQHHzGEQU1Z6uQCgbt4uSKC2ukxmITKrEoj9RgAA5QbfYZYKtLnPZoDgYoeXvXUcHmsrHZKfTLlQ1yoSQFgIbeFNN244J9jxQycR68rQfvgnmLEvwTrH9bg3QERfQeypKc8s-rJ6Py2b44vlfVj08fv199qW--fr6-urypdctoqQfbUTbghg-taMXIdKM1wx03HA8cM8560TBF-ci5EERjxTGxmtlhbLghQ89W1fXB10R1K7fJTSrtZVRO3gExraVKxWlvZaspY5jQsRlE03W4V6SjVmjRtJh3WIPXh4PXdh4ma7RdjuBPTE87wW3kOu5k14metcswb44GKf6c4aJycllb7-G8cc6SUr6siWGzVfX6QF0rGM2FMYKjXujyshUcNz3pG2Bd_IcFj7GTg5Pb0QF-IiAHgU4x52TH--kJlktG5SGjEjIql4xKDppXD9e-V_wLJfsLnj_m0w</recordid><startdate>20190817</startdate><enddate>20190817</enddate><creator>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira</creator><creator>de Jesus Martins, Marcelo</creator><creator>Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios</creator><creator>Lessa, Caio Nogueira</creator><creator>de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes</creator><creator>de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana</creator><creator>Alves, Rodrigo Leal</creator><creator>Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-0314</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190817</creationdate><title>Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial</title><author>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira ; de Jesus Martins, Marcelo ; Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento ; de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios ; Lessa, Caio Nogueira ; de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes ; de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana ; Alves, Rodrigo Leal ; Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Antiemetics</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dexamethasone</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal agents</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Medical societies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Nerve block</topic><topic>Ondansetron</topic><topic>Palonosetron</topic><topic>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Professional associations</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Spinal anesthesia</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><topic>Women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesus Martins, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessa, Caio Nogueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Rodrigo Leal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campos, Guilherme Oliveira</au><au>de Jesus Martins, Marcelo</au><au>Jesus, Gabriel Nascimento</au><au>de Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Rios</au><au>Lessa, Caio Nogueira</au><au>de Oliveira Junior, João Carlos Macêdo Fernandes</au><au>de Castro Alves, Lucas Jorge Santana</au><au>Alves, Rodrigo Leal</au><au>Módolo, Norma Sueli Pinheiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2019-08-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>159-159</pages><artnum>159</artnum><issn>1471-2253</issn><eissn>1471-2253</eissn><abstract>Hysterectomy is a widely performed surgery and neuraxial anesthesia with intrathecal morphine provides superior quality of recovery. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a frequent problem with intrathecal morphine use. Although palonosetron is effective for prevention of PONV after general anesthesia, its efficacy after neuraxial anesthesia has not been established. This study was conducted to compare the use of palonosetron with ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis in patients at a high risk of PONV during total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine.
This prospective, randomized double-blind study conducted at São Rafael Hospital involved 140 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II women who underwent TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and who had at least 3 risk factors for PONV based on Apfel's simplified score. The patients were randomized into two groups: one received palonosetron whereas the other received ondansetron. All patients received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, as well as dexamethasone plus palonosetron or ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of PONV, incidence of early- and late-onset nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, and use of rescue antiemetics were recorded.
The overall incidence of PONV was 42.9% in the palonosetron group and 52.9% in the ondansetron group (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed in the incidence of early- and late-onset nausea or early-onset vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of late-onset vomiting was significantly lower in the palonosetron group.
Palonosetron exhibited efficacy similar to that of ondansetron for reducing the overall incidence of PONV after TAH under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine; however, palonosetron reduced the incidence of late-onset vomiting significantly better than ondansetron.
RBR-4gnm8n ( ensaiosclinicos.gov.br ), date of registration: August 18, 2014.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>31421679</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12871-019-0830-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6308-0314</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2253 |
ispartof | BMC anesthesiology, 2019-08, Vol.19 (1), p.159-159, Article 159 |
issn | 1471-2253 1471-2253 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c233012f4b946608a162e9c9450760c |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abdominal surgery Anesthesia Antiemetics Care and treatment Clinical trials Comparative analysis Dexamethasone Dosage and administration Gastrointestinal agents Glucocorticoids Hysterectomy Medical societies Methods Morphine Nausea Nerve block Ondansetron Palonosetron Postoperative nausea and vomiting Prevention Professional associations Prophylaxis Spinal anesthesia Spine Surgery Vomiting Women's health |
title | Palonosetron versus ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting after total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Palonosetron%20versus%20ondansetron%20for%20prevention%20of%20nausea%20and%20vomiting%20after%20total%20abdominal%20hysterectomy%20under%20spinal%20anesthesia%20with%20intrathecal%20morphine:%20a%20double-blind,%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Campos,%20Guilherme%20Oliveira&rft.date=2019-08-17&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=159-159&rft.artnum=159&rft.issn=1471-2253&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12871-019-0830-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA597048184%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-be623b047b5959f3c4cc3067d70b703738943a27f77991c0a701ec3ebf47d1b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2275959070&rft_id=info:pmid/31421679&rft_galeid=A597048184&rfr_iscdi=true |