Loading…

Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system comprising co-cultured fed fish and organic extractive species representing three distinct trophic levels as well as the impact and potential utilization of two commercially available fish feeds made...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fishes 2024-02, Vol.9 (2), p.69
Main Authors: Cotou, Efthimia, Miliou, Helen, Chatzoglou, Evanthia, Schoina, Eirini, Politakis, Nektarios, Kogiannou, Dimitra, Fountoulaki, Eleni, Androni, Afrodite, Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki, Assimakopoulou, Georgia, Nathanailides, Cosmas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 69
container_title Fishes
container_volume 9
creator Cotou, Efthimia
Miliou, Helen
Chatzoglou, Evanthia
Schoina, Eirini
Politakis, Nektarios
Kogiannou, Dimitra
Fountoulaki, Eleni
Androni, Afrodite
Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki
Assimakopoulou, Georgia
Nathanailides, Cosmas
description This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system comprising co-cultured fed fish and organic extractive species representing three distinct trophic levels as well as the impact and potential utilization of two commercially available fish feeds made up of 35% fish meal (FM) and 20% fish meal (LFM) ingredients, using a multi-indicator assessment approach. Significant alterations were observed in growth performance indicators (GPIs), water and sediment quality indices, toxicity tests and biomarkers within the IMTA system. The fish survival, weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) were higher in the IMTA system with significantly lower feed conversion ratios (FCRs) and higher feed efficiency (FE) in comparison to the fed fish monoculture system. Yet, organic filter feeders displayed 100% survival, and increased shell growth, while deposit feeders exhibited successful survival and significant weight gain. In the comparison between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA, fed fish in FM-IMTA showed higher WG, SGR, and FE with lower FCR. Environmental parameters like temperature, oxygen, and nutrient concentrations fluctuated but generally improved in the IMTA system, indicating lower mesotrophic conditions. Sediment fatty acid profiles differed between systems and toxicity assessments, which suggested a lower impact in IMTA and FM-IMTA systems. The sediment microbial community displayed high similarity within IMTA systems and between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA. These findings underscore the potential of IMTA systems for sustainable aquaculture, emphasizing improved growth performance and reduced environmental impact, particularly when using fish meal feeds.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/fishes9020069
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c67c89f0c864bcd82dbffc8351242e3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A784039311</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c67c89f0c864bcd82dbffc8351242e3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A784039311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIJKrSI3dLnLfY6_2wuaVLUiIVAUo5W1573Djs2sH2UuU_8SNxEgRUQnOY0eh9n5mRpiheE3xNKcdvjY1biBxXGLf8WXFR1QSXlDH2_J_6ZXEV4w5jTDjnDeMXxc_b4B_TFn2GYHyYpFOApNNo6X7Y4N0ELskRfZnlaNMBrZ22CuJJcWP9JMM3CBFZhyTqfdnPY5oDIG9Q2gJazsHvQTq0AYluZIzo0eZRKzsmCCfGe9j7aBNaAegMeocWqJcR0CbN-nDEZPP64_0CbQ4xwfSqeGHkGOHqd74svq6W9_2H8u7T7bpf3JWqpl0qB2KaocGdlpgYqTgfWsZMRVutgOIBKHQDHRTpKKGsJmSApuaUQm0IN1i19LJYn7nay53YB5sPPQgvrTg1fHgQMiSrRhCNajvFjjbW1oPSrNKDMYrRhlR1BTSz3pxZ--C_zxCT2Pk5uLy-oLhmXVU1nP1VPcgMtc74FKSabFRi0bEaU04Jyarr_6hyaJis8g6Mzf0nhvJsUMHHGMD8OYZgcXwb8eRt6C9rerU_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048722598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Cotou, Efthimia ; Miliou, Helen ; Chatzoglou, Evanthia ; Schoina, Eirini ; Politakis, Nektarios ; Kogiannou, Dimitra ; Fountoulaki, Eleni ; Androni, Afrodite ; Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki ; Assimakopoulou, Georgia ; Nathanailides, Cosmas</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotou, Efthimia ; Miliou, Helen ; Chatzoglou, Evanthia ; Schoina, Eirini ; Politakis, Nektarios ; Kogiannou, Dimitra ; Fountoulaki, Eleni ; Androni, Afrodite ; Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki ; Assimakopoulou, Georgia ; Nathanailides, Cosmas</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system comprising co-cultured fed fish and organic extractive species representing three distinct trophic levels as well as the impact and potential utilization of two commercially available fish feeds made up of 35% fish meal (FM) and 20% fish meal (LFM) ingredients, using a multi-indicator assessment approach. Significant alterations were observed in growth performance indicators (GPIs), water and sediment quality indices, toxicity tests and biomarkers within the IMTA system. The fish survival, weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) were higher in the IMTA system with significantly lower feed conversion ratios (FCRs) and higher feed efficiency (FE) in comparison to the fed fish monoculture system. Yet, organic filter feeders displayed 100% survival, and increased shell growth, while deposit feeders exhibited successful survival and significant weight gain. In the comparison between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA, fed fish in FM-IMTA showed higher WG, SGR, and FE with lower FCR. Environmental parameters like temperature, oxygen, and nutrient concentrations fluctuated but generally improved in the IMTA system, indicating lower mesotrophic conditions. Sediment fatty acid profiles differed between systems and toxicity assessments, which suggested a lower impact in IMTA and FM-IMTA systems. The sediment microbial community displayed high similarity within IMTA systems and between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA. These findings underscore the potential of IMTA systems for sustainable aquaculture, emphasizing improved growth performance and reduced environmental impact, particularly when using fish meal feeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2410-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2410-3888</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/fishes9020069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alkalinity ; Aquaculture ; Bass ; Bioavailability ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Case studies ; Climate change ; Ecosystems ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental economics ; Environmental factors ; Environmental impact ; Environmental quality ; European sea bass ; Fatty acids ; Feed conversion ; Feed conversion efficiency ; Feed efficiency ; Feeds ; Filter feeders ; Fish ; Fish culture ; Fish feeds ; Fishmeal ; Food ; Food conversion ; Growth ; Growth rate ; Health aspects ; integrated multi-trophic aquaculture ; Marine fishes ; Methods ; Mollusks ; Monoculture ; Monoculture (aquaculture) ; Nutrient concentrations ; Nutrients ; Oysters ; Plankton ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Salinity ; Seafood ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Shellfish ; Survival ; Sustainability ; Sustainable aquaculture ; Toxicity ; Toxicity tests ; Trophic levels ; Water quality ; Weight ; Weight gain</subject><ispartof>Fishes, 2024-02, Vol.9 (2), p.69</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9215-4127 ; 0000-0002-2223-7135 ; 0000-0001-5503-3828 ; 0000-0003-1480-8257 ; 0000-0001-9873-2223</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3048722598/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3048722598?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotou, Efthimia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miliou, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzoglou, Evanthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoina, Eirini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politakis, Nektarios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogiannou, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fountoulaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Androni, Afrodite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assimakopoulou, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanailides, Cosmas</creatorcontrib><title>Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System</title><title>Fishes</title><description>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system comprising co-cultured fed fish and organic extractive species representing three distinct trophic levels as well as the impact and potential utilization of two commercially available fish feeds made up of 35% fish meal (FM) and 20% fish meal (LFM) ingredients, using a multi-indicator assessment approach. Significant alterations were observed in growth performance indicators (GPIs), water and sediment quality indices, toxicity tests and biomarkers within the IMTA system. The fish survival, weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) were higher in the IMTA system with significantly lower feed conversion ratios (FCRs) and higher feed efficiency (FE) in comparison to the fed fish monoculture system. Yet, organic filter feeders displayed 100% survival, and increased shell growth, while deposit feeders exhibited successful survival and significant weight gain. In the comparison between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA, fed fish in FM-IMTA showed higher WG, SGR, and FE with lower FCR. Environmental parameters like temperature, oxygen, and nutrient concentrations fluctuated but generally improved in the IMTA system, indicating lower mesotrophic conditions. Sediment fatty acid profiles differed between systems and toxicity assessments, which suggested a lower impact in IMTA and FM-IMTA systems. The sediment microbial community displayed high similarity within IMTA systems and between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA. These findings underscore the potential of IMTA systems for sustainable aquaculture, emphasizing improved growth performance and reduced environmental impact, particularly when using fish meal feeds.</description><subject>Alkalinity</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Bass</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>European sea bass</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Feed conversion</subject><subject>Feed conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Feed efficiency</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Filter feeders</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish culture</subject><subject>Fish feeds</subject><subject>Fishmeal</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food conversion</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>integrated multi-trophic aquaculture</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Monoculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Nutrient concentrations</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Oysters</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Seafood</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable aquaculture</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity tests</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Weight gain</subject><issn>2410-3888</issn><issn>2410-3888</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIJKrSI3dLnLfY6_2wuaVLUiIVAUo5W1573Djs2sH2UuU_8SNxEgRUQnOY0eh9n5mRpiheE3xNKcdvjY1biBxXGLf8WXFR1QSXlDH2_J_6ZXEV4w5jTDjnDeMXxc_b4B_TFn2GYHyYpFOApNNo6X7Y4N0ELskRfZnlaNMBrZ22CuJJcWP9JMM3CBFZhyTqfdnPY5oDIG9Q2gJazsHvQTq0AYluZIzo0eZRKzsmCCfGe9j7aBNaAegMeocWqJcR0CbN-nDEZPP64_0CbQ4xwfSqeGHkGOHqd74svq6W9_2H8u7T7bpf3JWqpl0qB2KaocGdlpgYqTgfWsZMRVutgOIBKHQDHRTpKKGsJmSApuaUQm0IN1i19LJYn7nay53YB5sPPQgvrTg1fHgQMiSrRhCNajvFjjbW1oPSrNKDMYrRhlR1BTSz3pxZ--C_zxCT2Pk5uLy-oLhmXVU1nP1VPcgMtc74FKSabFRi0bEaU04Jyarr_6hyaJis8g6Mzf0nhvJsUMHHGMD8OYZgcXwb8eRt6C9rerU_</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Cotou, Efthimia</creator><creator>Miliou, Helen</creator><creator>Chatzoglou, Evanthia</creator><creator>Schoina, Eirini</creator><creator>Politakis, Nektarios</creator><creator>Kogiannou, Dimitra</creator><creator>Fountoulaki, Eleni</creator><creator>Androni, Afrodite</creator><creator>Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki</creator><creator>Assimakopoulou, Georgia</creator><creator>Nathanailides, Cosmas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-7135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5503-3828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-8257</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-2223</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System</title><author>Cotou, Efthimia ; Miliou, Helen ; Chatzoglou, Evanthia ; Schoina, Eirini ; Politakis, Nektarios ; Kogiannou, Dimitra ; Fountoulaki, Eleni ; Androni, Afrodite ; Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki ; Assimakopoulou, Georgia ; Nathanailides, Cosmas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alkalinity</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Bass</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>European sea bass</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Feed conversion</topic><topic>Feed conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Feed efficiency</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Filter feeders</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish culture</topic><topic>Fish feeds</topic><topic>Fishmeal</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food conversion</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>integrated multi-trophic aquaculture</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Monoculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Nutrient concentrations</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Oysters</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Seafood</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable aquaculture</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity tests</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Weight gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotou, Efthimia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miliou, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzoglou, Evanthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoina, Eirini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Politakis, Nektarios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogiannou, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fountoulaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Androni, Afrodite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assimakopoulou, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanailides, Cosmas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Fishes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotou, Efthimia</au><au>Miliou, Helen</au><au>Chatzoglou, Evanthia</au><au>Schoina, Eirini</au><au>Politakis, Nektarios</au><au>Kogiannou, Dimitra</au><au>Fountoulaki, Eleni</au><au>Androni, Afrodite</au><au>Konstantinopoulou, Aggeliki</au><au>Assimakopoulou, Georgia</au><au>Nathanailides, Cosmas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System</atitle><jtitle>Fishes</jtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>69</spage><pages>69-</pages><issn>2410-3888</issn><eissn>2410-3888</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system comprising co-cultured fed fish and organic extractive species representing three distinct trophic levels as well as the impact and potential utilization of two commercially available fish feeds made up of 35% fish meal (FM) and 20% fish meal (LFM) ingredients, using a multi-indicator assessment approach. Significant alterations were observed in growth performance indicators (GPIs), water and sediment quality indices, toxicity tests and biomarkers within the IMTA system. The fish survival, weight gain (WG), and specific growth rate (SGR) were higher in the IMTA system with significantly lower feed conversion ratios (FCRs) and higher feed efficiency (FE) in comparison to the fed fish monoculture system. Yet, organic filter feeders displayed 100% survival, and increased shell growth, while deposit feeders exhibited successful survival and significant weight gain. In the comparison between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA, fed fish in FM-IMTA showed higher WG, SGR, and FE with lower FCR. Environmental parameters like temperature, oxygen, and nutrient concentrations fluctuated but generally improved in the IMTA system, indicating lower mesotrophic conditions. Sediment fatty acid profiles differed between systems and toxicity assessments, which suggested a lower impact in IMTA and FM-IMTA systems. The sediment microbial community displayed high similarity within IMTA systems and between FM-IMTA and LFM-IMTA. These findings underscore the potential of IMTA systems for sustainable aquaculture, emphasizing improved growth performance and reduced environmental impact, particularly when using fish meal feeds.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/fishes9020069</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-4127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2223-7135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5503-3828</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-8257</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-2223</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2410-3888
ispartof Fishes, 2024-02, Vol.9 (2), p.69
issn 2410-3888
2410-3888
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c67c89f0c864bcd82dbffc8351242e3
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Alkalinity
Aquaculture
Bass
Bioavailability
Biological markers
Biomarkers
Case studies
Climate change
Ecosystems
Environmental aspects
Environmental economics
Environmental factors
Environmental impact
Environmental quality
European sea bass
Fatty acids
Feed conversion
Feed conversion efficiency
Feed efficiency
Feeds
Filter feeders
Fish
Fish culture
Fish feeds
Fishmeal
Food
Food conversion
Growth
Growth rate
Health aspects
integrated multi-trophic aquaculture
Marine fishes
Methods
Mollusks
Monoculture
Monoculture (aquaculture)
Nutrient concentrations
Nutrients
Oysters
Plankton
Polyculture (aquaculture)
Salinity
Seafood
Sediment
Sediments
Shellfish
Survival
Sustainability
Sustainable aquaculture
Toxicity
Toxicity tests
Trophic levels
Water quality
Weight
Weight gain
title Growth Performance and Environmental Quality Indices and Biomarkers in a Co-Culture of the European Sea Bass with Filter and Deposit Feeders: A Case Study of an IMTA System
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth%20Performance%20and%20Environmental%20Quality%20Indices%20and%20Biomarkers%20in%20a%20Co-Culture%20of%20the%20European%20Sea%20Bass%20with%20Filter%20and%20Deposit%20Feeders:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20an%20IMTA%20System&rft.jtitle=Fishes&rft.au=Cotou,%20Efthimia&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=69&rft.pages=69-&rft.issn=2410-3888&rft.eissn=2410-3888&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/fishes9020069&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA784039311%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-b1f5b507da01fac99b688f236dce30be3e7b3bc173138411be54933e4f19f0c63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048722598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A784039311&rfr_iscdi=true