Loading…

Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time

Introduction Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a well‐established method to evaluate scaling indices of time series, which categorize the dynamics of complex systems. In the literature, DFA has been used to study the fluctuations of reaction time Y(n) time series, where n is the trial number....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and behavior 2023-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e3069-n/a
Main Authors: Mahmoodi, Korosh, Kerick, Scott E., Grigolini, Paolo, Franaszczuk, Piotr J., West, Bruce J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page e3069
container_title Brain and behavior
container_volume 13
creator Mahmoodi, Korosh
Kerick, Scott E.
Grigolini, Paolo
Franaszczuk, Piotr J.
West, Bruce J.
description Introduction Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a well‐established method to evaluate scaling indices of time series, which categorize the dynamics of complex systems. In the literature, DFA has been used to study the fluctuations of reaction time Y(n) time series, where n is the trial number. Methods Herein we propose treating each reaction time as a duration time that changes the representation from operational (trial number) time n to event (temporal) time t, or X(t). The DFA algorithm was then applied to the X(t) time series to evaluate scaling indices. The dataset analyzed is based on a Go–NoGo shooting task that was performed by 30 participants under low and high time‐stress conditions in each of six repeated sessions over a 3‐week period. Results This new perspective leads to quantitatively better results in (1) differentiating scaling indices between low versus high time‐stress conditions and (2) predicting task performance outcomes. Conclusion We show that by changing from operational time to event time, the DFA allows discrimination of time‐stress conditions and predicts performance outcomes. We introduce a novel conceptual and analytical framework for estimating the complexity of short behavioral time series using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). Analyzing the dataset based on a Go‐NoGo shooting task by this method, we found a clear classification of complexity indices between Low and High time‐stress conditions. We also found clear relations between complexity indices and errors of commission.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/brb3.3069
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c74a7ae9e2c4b54886c7bdc12e81a44</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c74a7ae9e2c4b54886c7bdc12e81a44</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2836113201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURqOqVUGURV-gitRNWQz43043VUG0RUJCQnRtOTc31KNknNrJlHl7nBmKAAlvbF0fH1_7K4qPlBxTQthJHWt-zImq3hT7jCq24ExXb5-s94rDlJYkD0kFE-R9scc1Y7QyZL-4vsF-CNF1JYR-6PDOj5uyR5emiGVoy4gORh9W5eh7LBNGj-lreTVgdHM5n1tjTFMqcY2rcUt9KN61rkt4-DAfFL9_nN-c_VpcXv28OPt-uQBJSbWgQhoipXAaKTegNJhGoQGjq1qyWhGnlJaVaaAFCQqcFso42lQOpKh5yw-Ki523CW5ph-h7Fzc2OG-3hRBvrYujhw6tBJ3vcVghA1FLYYwCXTdAGRrqhMiubzvXMNU9NpDfkv_kmfT5zsr_sbdhbSnhPHfMsuHLgyGGvxOm0fY-AXadW2GYkmWGGi2MJDP6-QW6DFPMfzlTXFHKGaGZOtpREENKEdvHbiixc_J2Tt7OyWf209P2H8n_OWfgZAf88x1uXjfZ0-tTvlXeA__nt7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836113201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Mahmoodi, Korosh ; Kerick, Scott E. ; Grigolini, Paolo ; Franaszczuk, Piotr J. ; West, Bruce J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodi, Korosh ; Kerick, Scott E. ; Grigolini, Paolo ; Franaszczuk, Piotr J. ; West, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a well‐established method to evaluate scaling indices of time series, which categorize the dynamics of complex systems. In the literature, DFA has been used to study the fluctuations of reaction time Y(n) time series, where n is the trial number. Methods Herein we propose treating each reaction time as a duration time that changes the representation from operational (trial number) time n to event (temporal) time t, or X(t). The DFA algorithm was then applied to the X(t) time series to evaluate scaling indices. The dataset analyzed is based on a Go–NoGo shooting task that was performed by 30 participants under low and high time‐stress conditions in each of six repeated sessions over a 3‐week period. Results This new perspective leads to quantitatively better results in (1) differentiating scaling indices between low versus high time‐stress conditions and (2) predicting task performance outcomes. Conclusion We show that by changing from operational time to event time, the DFA allows discrimination of time‐stress conditions and predicts performance outcomes. We introduce a novel conceptual and analytical framework for estimating the complexity of short behavioral time series using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). Analyzing the dataset based on a Go‐NoGo shooting task by this method, we found a clear classification of complexity indices between Low and High time‐stress conditions. We also found clear relations between complexity indices and errors of commission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37221980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>detrended fluctuation analysis ; Estimates ; Fourier transforms ; Humans ; Memory ; Original ; Reaction Time ; reaction time series ; temporal complexity ; Time Factors ; Time series ; time‐stress</subject><ispartof>Brain and behavior, 2023-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e3069-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1590-6115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836113201/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2836113201?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11542,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,46031,46455,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodi, Korosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerick, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigolini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franaszczuk, Piotr J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time</title><title>Brain and behavior</title><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><description>Introduction Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a well‐established method to evaluate scaling indices of time series, which categorize the dynamics of complex systems. In the literature, DFA has been used to study the fluctuations of reaction time Y(n) time series, where n is the trial number. Methods Herein we propose treating each reaction time as a duration time that changes the representation from operational (trial number) time n to event (temporal) time t, or X(t). The DFA algorithm was then applied to the X(t) time series to evaluate scaling indices. The dataset analyzed is based on a Go–NoGo shooting task that was performed by 30 participants under low and high time‐stress conditions in each of six repeated sessions over a 3‐week period. Results This new perspective leads to quantitatively better results in (1) differentiating scaling indices between low versus high time‐stress conditions and (2) predicting task performance outcomes. Conclusion We show that by changing from operational time to event time, the DFA allows discrimination of time‐stress conditions and predicts performance outcomes. We introduce a novel conceptual and analytical framework for estimating the complexity of short behavioral time series using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). Analyzing the dataset based on a Go‐NoGo shooting task by this method, we found a clear classification of complexity indices between Low and High time‐stress conditions. We also found clear relations between complexity indices and errors of commission.</description><subject>detrended fluctuation analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>reaction time series</subject><subject>temporal complexity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>time‐stress</subject><issn>2162-3279</issn><issn>2162-3279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURqOqVUGURV-gitRNWQz43043VUG0RUJCQnRtOTc31KNknNrJlHl7nBmKAAlvbF0fH1_7K4qPlBxTQthJHWt-zImq3hT7jCq24ExXb5-s94rDlJYkD0kFE-R9scc1Y7QyZL-4vsF-CNF1JYR-6PDOj5uyR5emiGVoy4gORh9W5eh7LBNGj-lreTVgdHM5n1tjTFMqcY2rcUt9KN61rkt4-DAfFL9_nN-c_VpcXv28OPt-uQBJSbWgQhoipXAaKTegNJhGoQGjq1qyWhGnlJaVaaAFCQqcFso42lQOpKh5yw-Ki523CW5ph-h7Fzc2OG-3hRBvrYujhw6tBJ3vcVghA1FLYYwCXTdAGRrqhMiubzvXMNU9NpDfkv_kmfT5zsr_sbdhbSnhPHfMsuHLgyGGvxOm0fY-AXadW2GYkmWGGi2MJDP6-QW6DFPMfzlTXFHKGaGZOtpREENKEdvHbiixc_J2Tt7OyWf209P2H8n_OWfgZAf88x1uXjfZ0-tTvlXeA__nt7U</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Mahmoodi, Korosh</creator><creator>Kerick, Scott E.</creator><creator>Grigolini, Paolo</creator><creator>Franaszczuk, Piotr J.</creator><creator>West, Bruce J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-6115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time</title><author>Mahmoodi, Korosh ; Kerick, Scott E. ; Grigolini, Paolo ; Franaszczuk, Piotr J. ; West, Bruce J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>detrended fluctuation analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>reaction time series</topic><topic>temporal complexity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>time‐stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahmoodi, Korosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerick, Scott E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigolini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franaszczuk, Piotr J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>West, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahmoodi, Korosh</au><au>Kerick, Scott E.</au><au>Grigolini, Paolo</au><au>Franaszczuk, Piotr J.</au><au>West, Bruce J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time</atitle><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e3069</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3069-n/a</pages><issn>2162-3279</issn><eissn>2162-3279</eissn><abstract>Introduction Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) is a well‐established method to evaluate scaling indices of time series, which categorize the dynamics of complex systems. In the literature, DFA has been used to study the fluctuations of reaction time Y(n) time series, where n is the trial number. Methods Herein we propose treating each reaction time as a duration time that changes the representation from operational (trial number) time n to event (temporal) time t, or X(t). The DFA algorithm was then applied to the X(t) time series to evaluate scaling indices. The dataset analyzed is based on a Go–NoGo shooting task that was performed by 30 participants under low and high time‐stress conditions in each of six repeated sessions over a 3‐week period. Results This new perspective leads to quantitatively better results in (1) differentiating scaling indices between low versus high time‐stress conditions and (2) predicting task performance outcomes. Conclusion We show that by changing from operational time to event time, the DFA allows discrimination of time‐stress conditions and predicts performance outcomes. We introduce a novel conceptual and analytical framework for estimating the complexity of short behavioral time series using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). Analyzing the dataset based on a Go‐NoGo shooting task by this method, we found a clear classification of complexity indices between Low and High time‐stress conditions. We also found clear relations between complexity indices and errors of commission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37221980</pmid><doi>10.1002/brb3.3069</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-6115</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2162-3279
ispartof Brain and behavior, 2023-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e3069-n/a
issn 2162-3279
2162-3279
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5c74a7ae9e2c4b54886c7bdc12e81a44
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access); PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects detrended fluctuation analysis
Estimates
Fourier transforms
Humans
Memory
Original
Reaction Time
reaction time series
temporal complexity
Time Factors
Time series
time‐stress
title Temporal complexity measure of reaction time series: Operational versus event time
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A01%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20complexity%20measure%20of%20reaction%20time%20series:%20Operational%20versus%20event%20time&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Mahmoodi,%20Korosh&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e3069&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3069-n/a&rft.issn=2162-3279&rft.eissn=2162-3279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/brb3.3069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2836113201%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5109-14580554a7e138c67c8d6e8c879b52b60a667598dcfc5c6ca7468a1d9ac54b3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836113201&rft_id=info:pmid/37221980&rfr_iscdi=true