Post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: quality improvement in primary care

• Published in: BMJ open quality 2020-12, Vol.9 (4), p.e000891
• Main Authors: Howard, Susan J, Elvey, Rebecca, Ohrnberger, Julius, Turner, Alex J, Anselmi, Laura, Martindale, Anne-Marie, Blakeman, Tom
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: acute kidney injury; audit and feedback; Audits; Blood tests; clinical audit; Collaboration; Hospitals; Illnesses; Intervention; Kidneys; Medical research; Mortality; Patient safety; Primary care; Professional education; Quality control; Quality improvement; Quality Improvement Report
• ISSN: 2399-6641; 2399-6641
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000891

BackgroundOver the past decade, targeting acute kidney injury (AKI) has become a priority to improve patient safety and health outcomes. Illness complicated by AKI is common and is associated with adverse outcomes including high rates of unplanned hospital readmission. Through national patient safety directives, NHS England has mandated the implementation of an AKI clinical decision support system in hospitals. In order to improve care following AKI, hospitals have also been incentivised to improve discharge summaries and general practices are recommended to establish registers of people who have had an episode of illness complicated by AKI. However, to date, there is limited evidence surrounding the development and impact of interventions following AKI.DesignWe conducted a quality improvement project in primary care aiming to improve the management of patients following an episode of hospital care complicated by AKI. All 31 general practices within a single NHS Clinical Commissioning Group were incentivised by a locally commissioned service to engage in audit and feedback, education training and to develop an action plan at each practice to improve management of AKI.ResultsAKI coding in general practice increased from 28% of cases in 2015/2016 to 50% in 2017/2018. Coding of AKI was associated with significant improvements in downstream patient management in terms of conducting a medication review within 1 month of hospital discharge, monitoring kidney function within 3 months and providing written information about AKI to patients. However, there was no effect on unplanned hospitalisation and mortality.ConclusionThe findings suggest that the quality improvement intervention successfully engaged a primary care workforce in AKI-related care, but that a higher intensity intervention is likely to be required to improve health outcomes. Development of a real-time audit tool is necessary to better understand and minimise the impact of the high mortality rate following AKI.