Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership

This report shares the experience during selection, implementation and maintenance phases of an electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) in a public–private partnership project and comments on user’s feedback. In particular, we address which time constraints for roll-out of an ELN exist in granted proje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ. Computer science 2016-09, Vol.2, p.e83, Article e83
Main Authors: Vaas, Lea A.I, Witt, Gesa, Windshügel, Björn, Bosin, Andrea, Serra, Giovanni, Bruengger, Adrian, Winterhalter, Mathias, Gribbon, Philip, Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J, Kohler, Manfred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Archives & records
Biology
Collaboration
Consortia
Data retrieval
Documentation
Drug resistance
Electronic laboratory notebook
Experiments
Feedback
IMI
Information sharing
Innovations
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Intellectual property
Internships
Laboratories
Life sciences
New Drugs for Bad Bugs
Open access
Pharmaceutical industry
Public-private sector cooperation
public–private partnership
R&D
Research & development
Software
User groups
Working groups
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page e83
container_title PeerJ. Computer science
container_volume 2
creator Vaas, Lea A.I
Witt, Gesa
Windshügel, Björn
Bosin, Andrea
Serra, Giovanni
Bruengger, Adrian
Winterhalter, Mathias
Gribbon, Philip
Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J
Kohler, Manfred
description This report shares the experience during selection, implementation and maintenance phases of an electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) in a public–private partnership project and comments on user’s feedback. In particular, we address which time constraints for roll-out of an ELN exist in granted projects and which benefits and/or restrictions come with out-of-the-box solutions. We discuss several options for the implementation of support functions and potential advantages of open access solutions. Connected to that, we identified willingness and a vivid culture of data sharing as the major item leading to success or failure of collaborative research activities. The feedback from users turned out to be the only angle for driving technical improvements, but also exhibited high efficiency. Based on these experiences, we describe best practices for future projects on implementation and support of an ELN supporting a diverse, multidisciplinary user group based in academia, NGOs, and/or for-profit corporations located in multiple time zones.
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj-cs.83
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5d4db56cff544994a9b19e44ad8e2120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543341932</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5d4db56cff544994a9b19e44ad8e2120</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543341932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc9q3DAQxk1poSHNqS9g6CkUbyRLsqTjEtJmIVDon7MYjeWttl7LkbQlufUd8oZ5kijZ0mSh0kGj4fd9fMNU1XtKFlJSeTY7FzcNpoVir6qjlsmuEVq3r1_Ub6uTlDaEECpoOfqoWl6MDnMMk8d6BBsi5BBv6ylkZ0P4lWo_1VDPOzt6vP9zN0f_G7KrZ4h5cjH99PO76s0AY3Inf9_j6seni-_nl83Vl8-r8-VVg4KJ3HApZNdxLSwdtEAB5Y9dD7JXqms5ldZKRYgUyCwDqZhEEGRQyuqWdAzZcbXa-_YBNqYE2UK8NQG8eWqEuDYllMfRGdHz3ooOh0FwrjUHbal2nEOvXEtbUrw-7L3mGK53LmWzCbs4lfiG6pJRK866Z2oNxdRPQ8gRcOsTmqXgjHGqWVuoxX-ocnu39RgmN_jSPxCcHggKk91NXsMuJbP69vWQ_bhnMYaUohv-DU6Jedy6edq6wWQUYw8QNp5C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949598436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Vaas, Lea A.I ; Witt, Gesa ; Windshügel, Björn ; Bosin, Andrea ; Serra, Giovanni ; Bruengger, Adrian ; Winterhalter, Mathias ; Gribbon, Philip ; Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J ; Kohler, Manfred</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaas, Lea A.I ; Witt, Gesa ; Windshügel, Björn ; Bosin, Andrea ; Serra, Giovanni ; Bruengger, Adrian ; Winterhalter, Mathias ; Gribbon, Philip ; Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J ; Kohler, Manfred</creatorcontrib><description>This report shares the experience during selection, implementation and maintenance phases of an electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) in a public–private partnership project and comments on user’s feedback. In particular, we address which time constraints for roll-out of an ELN exist in granted projects and which benefits and/or restrictions come with out-of-the-box solutions. We discuss several options for the implementation of support functions and potential advantages of open access solutions. Connected to that, we identified willingness and a vivid culture of data sharing as the major item leading to success or failure of collaborative research activities. The feedback from users turned out to be the only angle for driving technical improvements, but also exhibited high efficiency. Based on these experiences, we describe best practices for future projects on implementation and support of an ELN supporting a diverse, multidisciplinary user group based in academia, NGOs, and/or for-profit corporations located in multiple time zones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2376-5992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-5992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.83</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Archives &amp; records ; Biology ; Collaboration ; Consortia ; Data retrieval ; Documentation ; Drug resistance ; Electronic laboratory notebook ; Experiments ; Feedback ; IMI ; Information sharing ; Innovations ; Innovative Medicines Initiative ; Intellectual property ; Internships ; Laboratories ; Life sciences ; New Drugs for Bad Bugs ; Open access ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Public-private sector cooperation ; public–private partnership ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Software ; User groups ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>PeerJ. Computer science, 2016-09, Vol.2, p.e83, Article e83</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Vaas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1949598436/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1949598436?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaas, Lea A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Gesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windshügel, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosin, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruengger, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winterhalter, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gribbon, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Manfred</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership</title><title>PeerJ. Computer science</title><description>This report shares the experience during selection, implementation and maintenance phases of an electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) in a public–private partnership project and comments on user’s feedback. In particular, we address which time constraints for roll-out of an ELN exist in granted projects and which benefits and/or restrictions come with out-of-the-box solutions. We discuss several options for the implementation of support functions and potential advantages of open access solutions. Connected to that, we identified willingness and a vivid culture of data sharing as the major item leading to success or failure of collaborative research activities. The feedback from users turned out to be the only angle for driving technical improvements, but also exhibited high efficiency. Based on these experiences, we describe best practices for future projects on implementation and support of an ELN supporting a diverse, multidisciplinary user group based in academia, NGOs, and/or for-profit corporations located in multiple time zones.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Data retrieval</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Electronic laboratory notebook</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>IMI</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Innovative Medicines Initiative</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Internships</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>New Drugs for Bad Bugs</subject><subject>Open access</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Public-private sector cooperation</subject><subject>public–private partnership</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>User groups</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>2376-5992</issn><issn>2376-5992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc9q3DAQxk1poSHNqS9g6CkUbyRLsqTjEtJmIVDon7MYjeWttl7LkbQlufUd8oZ5kijZ0mSh0kGj4fd9fMNU1XtKFlJSeTY7FzcNpoVir6qjlsmuEVq3r1_Ub6uTlDaEECpoOfqoWl6MDnMMk8d6BBsi5BBv6ylkZ0P4lWo_1VDPOzt6vP9zN0f_G7KrZ4h5cjH99PO76s0AY3Inf9_j6seni-_nl83Vl8-r8-VVg4KJ3HApZNdxLSwdtEAB5Y9dD7JXqms5ldZKRYgUyCwDqZhEEGRQyuqWdAzZcbXa-_YBNqYE2UK8NQG8eWqEuDYllMfRGdHz3ooOh0FwrjUHbal2nEOvXEtbUrw-7L3mGK53LmWzCbs4lfiG6pJRK866Z2oNxdRPQ8gRcOsTmqXgjHGqWVuoxX-ocnu39RgmN_jSPxCcHggKk91NXsMuJbP69vWQ_bhnMYaUohv-DU6Jedy6edq6wWQUYw8QNp5C</recordid><startdate>20160919</startdate><enddate>20160919</enddate><creator>Vaas, Lea A.I</creator><creator>Witt, Gesa</creator><creator>Windshügel, Björn</creator><creator>Bosin, Andrea</creator><creator>Serra, Giovanni</creator><creator>Bruengger, Adrian</creator><creator>Winterhalter, Mathias</creator><creator>Gribbon, Philip</creator><creator>Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J</creator><creator>Kohler, Manfred</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160919</creationdate><title>Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership</title><author>Vaas, Lea A.I ; Witt, Gesa ; Windshügel, Björn ; Bosin, Andrea ; Serra, Giovanni ; Bruengger, Adrian ; Winterhalter, Mathias ; Gribbon, Philip ; Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J ; Kohler, Manfred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Data retrieval</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Electronic laboratory notebook</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>IMI</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Innovative Medicines Initiative</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Internships</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>New Drugs for Bad Bugs</topic><topic>Open access</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Public-private sector cooperation</topic><topic>public–private partnership</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>User groups</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaas, Lea A.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Gesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windshügel, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosin, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serra, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruengger, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winterhalter, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gribbon, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohler, Manfred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ. Computer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaas, Lea A.I</au><au>Witt, Gesa</au><au>Windshügel, Björn</au><au>Bosin, Andrea</au><au>Serra, Giovanni</au><au>Bruengger, Adrian</au><au>Winterhalter, Mathias</au><au>Gribbon, Philip</au><au>Levy-Petelinkar, Cindy J</au><au>Kohler, Manfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ. Computer science</jtitle><date>2016-09-19</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>e83</spage><pages>e83-</pages><artnum>e83</artnum><issn>2376-5992</issn><eissn>2376-5992</eissn><abstract>This report shares the experience during selection, implementation and maintenance phases of an electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) in a public–private partnership project and comments on user’s feedback. In particular, we address which time constraints for roll-out of an ELN exist in granted projects and which benefits and/or restrictions come with out-of-the-box solutions. We discuss several options for the implementation of support functions and potential advantages of open access solutions. Connected to that, we identified willingness and a vivid culture of data sharing as the major item leading to success or failure of collaborative research activities. The feedback from users turned out to be the only angle for driving technical improvements, but also exhibited high efficiency. Based on these experiences, we describe best practices for future projects on implementation and support of an ELN supporting a diverse, multidisciplinary user group based in academia, NGOs, and/or for-profit corporations located in multiple time zones.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><doi>10.7717/peerj-cs.83</doi><tpages>e83</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2376-5992
ispartof PeerJ. Computer science, 2016-09, Vol.2, p.e83, Article e83
issn 2376-5992
2376-5992
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5d4db56cff544994a9b19e44ad8e2120
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Archives & records
Biology
Collaboration
Consortia
Data retrieval
Documentation
Drug resistance
Electronic laboratory notebook
Experiments
Feedback
IMI
Information sharing
Innovations
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Intellectual property
Internships
Laboratories
Life sciences
New Drugs for Bad Bugs
Open access
Pharmaceutical industry
Public-private sector cooperation
public–private partnership
R&D
Research & development
Software
User groups
Working groups
title Electronic laboratory notebooks in a public–private partnership
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20laboratory%20notebooks%20in%20a%20public%E2%80%93private%20partnership&rft.jtitle=PeerJ.%20Computer%20science&rft.au=Vaas,%20Lea%20A.I&rft.date=2016-09-19&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=e83&rft.pages=e83-&rft.artnum=e83&rft.issn=2376-5992&rft.eissn=2376-5992&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj-cs.83&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543341932%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-475766495b1f95c5a757c6da7d8862417bb780075c3b3a7837ca50f88b92063c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949598436&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A543341932&rfr_iscdi=true