A new configuration of lateral-pin fixation for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: A biomechanical analysis

• Published in: Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 2024-03, Vol.58 (2), p.110-115
• Main Authors: Bilgili, Fuat, Demirel, Mehmet, Birişik, Fevzi, İbrahim Balcı, Halil, Sunbuloglu, Emin, Bozdag, Ergun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1017-995X; 2589-1294
• DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.21091

Objective: The aim of this study was to biomechanically compare a new lateral-pinning technique, in which pins engage the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus in a divergent configuration in both the axial and sagittal planes instead of the coronal plane, with the cross-pin, and with 2 and 3 coronally divergent lateral-pin techniques in a synthetic humerus model of supracondylar humerus fractures. Methods: Thirty-six identical synthetic models of the humerus simulating a standardized supracondylar humerus fracture were included in this study. They were divided into 4 groups based on the pin configuration of fixation: the new 3-lateral pin-fixation technique (group A), 2 crossed pins (group B), 3 divergent lateral pins (group C), and 2 divergent lateral pins (group D). Each model was subjected to combined axial and torsional loading, and then torsional stability and torsional stiffness (Nmm/°) were recorded. Results: Group A had greater rotational stability than groups C and D but had no statistically significant additional rotational stability compared with group B (P=.042, P=.008, P=.648, respectively), whereas group B had greater rotational stability than only group D (P=.020). Furthermore, group A demonstrated higher internal rotational stiffness compared with groups C and D (P=.038, P=.006, respectively). Group B had better internal rotational stiffness than group D (P=.015). There was no significant difference in internal rotational stiffness between groups A and B (P=. 542), groups B and C (P=.804), and groups D and C (P=.352). Although no statistically significant differences existed between groups A and B, the modified pin configuration exhibited the highest torsional stability and stiffness. Group D showed the lowest values in all biomechanical properties. Conclusion: This study has shown us that this new lateral-pinning technique may provide torsional resistance to internal rotational displacement as strong as the standard technique of crossed-pin configuration of fixation. Furthermore, with this new pin configuration, greater torsional resistance can be obtained than with either the standard 2- or the standard 3-lateral divergent pin configuration.