Loading…
Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?
This study examines the relationship between multidimensional corporate social performance (CSP) and shareholder value, considering the moderating impacts of country-specific factors: economic development, the political system, and culture. Based on a sample of public companies in Asian-Pacific emer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Humanities & social sciences communications 2024-12, Vol.11 (1), p.116-20, Article 116 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-3f09786889885ad0fb548dfa263f06d265cf9235a47dcc25719da6a5bbf82ca93 |
container_end_page | 20 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Humanities & social sciences communications |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert |
description | This study examines the relationship between multidimensional corporate social performance (CSP) and shareholder value, considering the moderating impacts of country-specific factors: economic development, the political system, and culture. Based on a sample of public companies in Asian-Pacific emerging countries over the 2010–2020 period, the findings reveal that the aggregate CSP measure obscures the valuation effect, whereas individual CSP dimensions highlight positive valuation effects. The CSP valuation effect varies across dimensions aimed at different stakeholder groups. Notably, narrowly focused CSP dimensions (community, product responsibility, and workforce) demonstrate more pronounced valuation effects than broadly focused dimensions (human rights). Given CSP’s multifaceted nature, directing attention toward the aggregate measure or incorrect dimensions may yield unwarranted conclusions. To enhance shareholder value through CSP, importance-performance analysis suggests prioritized resource allocation to human rights, community, product responsibility, and workforce dimensions. Intriguingly, the positive valuation effect of CSP is amplified in countries with higher income-per-capita and lower corruption, indicative of economic development and a robust political system, respectively. However, humane orientation—a cultural proxy—exerts no moderating impact on the CSP-shareholder value relationship. Comprehending the moderating roles of country-specific factors bears significant implications for bolstering CSP across diverse global regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41599-024-02615-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5d97e6f8439245d695a1e3bf4fbee1e4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5d97e6f8439245d695a1e3bf4fbee1e4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2915840360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-3f09786889885ad0fb548dfa263f06d265cf9235a47dcc25719da6a5bbf82ca93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1rHDEMhofSQpdk_0BPhpwn9ffYuZSwJOlCIJe2V6Ox5XaW2fXU9iTk33d2t4QchIT06JXgbZovjF4zqrqvRTJlbUu5XEIz1YoPzYprzVtrLf_4rv7crEvZUUq5Ylxys2rwF4wzkowjPsPBI0mR7OexDhE8VgzEpzylDBVJSX6AkUyYY8r7I3xD_qQXEtICzYeaX9syoR_i4MmyXVMuZA-1Yv522XyKMBZc_88Xzc_7ux-b7-3j08N2c_vYeiF0bUWktjPaGGuMgkBjr6QJEbheJjpwrXy0XCiQXfCeq47ZABpU30fDPVhx0WzPuiHBzk152EN-dQkGd2qk_NtBroMf0algO9TRSGG5VEFbBQxFH2XsERnKRevqrDXl9HfGUt0uzfmwvO-4ZcpIKjRdKH6mfE6lZIxvVxl1R3fc2R23uONO7jgh_gFy_YNh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2915840360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</creator><creatorcontrib>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the relationship between multidimensional corporate social performance (CSP) and shareholder value, considering the moderating impacts of country-specific factors: economic development, the political system, and culture. Based on a sample of public companies in Asian-Pacific emerging countries over the 2010–2020 period, the findings reveal that the aggregate CSP measure obscures the valuation effect, whereas individual CSP dimensions highlight positive valuation effects. The CSP valuation effect varies across dimensions aimed at different stakeholder groups. Notably, narrowly focused CSP dimensions (community, product responsibility, and workforce) demonstrate more pronounced valuation effects than broadly focused dimensions (human rights). Given CSP’s multifaceted nature, directing attention toward the aggregate measure or incorrect dimensions may yield unwarranted conclusions. To enhance shareholder value through CSP, importance-performance analysis suggests prioritized resource allocation to human rights, community, product responsibility, and workforce dimensions. Intriguingly, the positive valuation effect of CSP is amplified in countries with higher income-per-capita and lower corruption, indicative of economic development and a robust political system, respectively. However, humane orientation—a cultural proxy—exerts no moderating impact on the CSP-shareholder value relationship. Comprehending the moderating roles of country-specific factors bears significant implications for bolstering CSP across diverse global regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-9992</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-9992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02615-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan</publisher><subject>Economic development ; Human rights ; Political systems ; Regression analysis ; Stakeholders ; Stockholders ; Valuation ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Humanities & social sciences communications, 2024-12, Vol.11 (1), p.116-20, Article 116</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-3f09786889885ad0fb548dfa263f06d265cf9235a47dcc25719da6a5bbf82ca93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4665-5470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2915840360/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2915840360?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,25753,27924,27925,33611,37012,43733,44590,74093,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</creatorcontrib><title>Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?</title><title>Humanities & social sciences communications</title><description>This study examines the relationship between multidimensional corporate social performance (CSP) and shareholder value, considering the moderating impacts of country-specific factors: economic development, the political system, and culture. Based on a sample of public companies in Asian-Pacific emerging countries over the 2010–2020 period, the findings reveal that the aggregate CSP measure obscures the valuation effect, whereas individual CSP dimensions highlight positive valuation effects. The CSP valuation effect varies across dimensions aimed at different stakeholder groups. Notably, narrowly focused CSP dimensions (community, product responsibility, and workforce) demonstrate more pronounced valuation effects than broadly focused dimensions (human rights). Given CSP’s multifaceted nature, directing attention toward the aggregate measure or incorrect dimensions may yield unwarranted conclusions. To enhance shareholder value through CSP, importance-performance analysis suggests prioritized resource allocation to human rights, community, product responsibility, and workforce dimensions. Intriguingly, the positive valuation effect of CSP is amplified in countries with higher income-per-capita and lower corruption, indicative of economic development and a robust political system, respectively. However, humane orientation—a cultural proxy—exerts no moderating impact on the CSP-shareholder value relationship. Comprehending the moderating roles of country-specific factors bears significant implications for bolstering CSP across diverse global regions.</description><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>2662-9992</issn><issn>2662-9992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1rHDEMhofSQpdk_0BPhpwn9ffYuZSwJOlCIJe2V6Ox5XaW2fXU9iTk33d2t4QchIT06JXgbZovjF4zqrqvRTJlbUu5XEIz1YoPzYprzVtrLf_4rv7crEvZUUq5Ylxys2rwF4wzkowjPsPBI0mR7OexDhE8VgzEpzylDBVJSX6AkUyYY8r7I3xD_qQXEtICzYeaX9syoR_i4MmyXVMuZA-1Yv522XyKMBZc_88Xzc_7ux-b7-3j08N2c_vYeiF0bUWktjPaGGuMgkBjr6QJEbheJjpwrXy0XCiQXfCeq47ZABpU30fDPVhx0WzPuiHBzk152EN-dQkGd2qk_NtBroMf0algO9TRSGG5VEFbBQxFH2XsERnKRevqrDXl9HfGUt0uzfmwvO-4ZcpIKjRdKH6mfE6lZIxvVxl1R3fc2R23uONO7jgh_gFy_YNh</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><general>Springer Nature</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-5470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?</title><author>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-3f09786889885ad0fb548dfa263f06d265cf9235a47dcc25719da6a5bbf82ca93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Humanities & social sciences communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?</atitle><jtitle>Humanities & social sciences communications</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>116-20</pages><artnum>116</artnum><issn>2662-9992</issn><eissn>2662-9992</eissn><abstract>This study examines the relationship between multidimensional corporate social performance (CSP) and shareholder value, considering the moderating impacts of country-specific factors: economic development, the political system, and culture. Based on a sample of public companies in Asian-Pacific emerging countries over the 2010–2020 period, the findings reveal that the aggregate CSP measure obscures the valuation effect, whereas individual CSP dimensions highlight positive valuation effects. The CSP valuation effect varies across dimensions aimed at different stakeholder groups. Notably, narrowly focused CSP dimensions (community, product responsibility, and workforce) demonstrate more pronounced valuation effects than broadly focused dimensions (human rights). Given CSP’s multifaceted nature, directing attention toward the aggregate measure or incorrect dimensions may yield unwarranted conclusions. To enhance shareholder value through CSP, importance-performance analysis suggests prioritized resource allocation to human rights, community, product responsibility, and workforce dimensions. Intriguingly, the positive valuation effect of CSP is amplified in countries with higher income-per-capita and lower corruption, indicative of economic development and a robust political system, respectively. However, humane orientation—a cultural proxy—exerts no moderating impact on the CSP-shareholder value relationship. Comprehending the moderating roles of country-specific factors bears significant implications for bolstering CSP across diverse global regions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan</pub><doi>10.1057/s41599-024-02615-3</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-5470</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2662-9992 |
ispartof | Humanities & social sciences communications, 2024-12, Vol.11 (1), p.116-20, Article 116 |
issn | 2662-9992 2662-9992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5d97e6f8439245d695a1e3bf4fbee1e4 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Economic development Human rights Political systems Regression analysis Stakeholders Stockholders Valuation Workforce |
title | Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20relevance%20of%20multifaceted%20corporate%20social%20performance:%20how%20do%20country-specific%20factors%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Humanities%20&%20social%20sciences%20communications&rft.au=Jitmaneeroj,%20Boonlert&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=116-20&rft.artnum=116&rft.issn=2662-9992&rft.eissn=2662-9992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41599-024-02615-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2915840360%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-3f09786889885ad0fb548dfa263f06d265cf9235a47dcc25719da6a5bbf82ca93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2915840360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |