Loading…

Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:MedEdPORTAL 2020-12, Vol.16, p.11039-11039
Main Authors: Greenfield, Jessica, Traboulsi, Elias I, Lombardo-Klefos, Krista, Bierer, S Beth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73
container_end_page 11039
container_issue
container_start_page 11039
container_title MedEdPORTAL
container_volume 16
creator Greenfield, Jessica
Traboulsi, Elias I
Lombardo-Klefos, Krista
Bierer, S Beth
description The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11039
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2470628248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUV1P3DAQtKpWBR38g6rKY19C44849kslOF0pEohKbZ-tjb2-BiVxaicn8e9r7uAET17vzoy9M4R8otUFrRspvw44GcYbUSom6wtKK67fkdNj5_2r-oScp_RQVRXVWsuKfiQnnHMmGqFPCVxhmoufEezcWUyFD7G4WrredeO2gNEVv5ZpCnF-um68xwzbYXG5vr7blHd5DjO6TA_bCEOx2UG_wNyFsViHYejmGTGdkQ8e-oTnz-eK_Pm--b3-Ud7eX9-sL29Ly5XWpbKSWS3RU2hbUBLQ5oI13uUdvGq1kqpGx2rhwbUV9yA5aE2Z9lzW0PAVuTnougAPZordAPHRBOjMvhHi1kDew_ZoameFBi7QVVY0WkHNqaDgGisld-iy1reD1rS0AzqL4xyhfyP6djJ2f8027EzTcEazuyvy5Vkghn9LttgMXbLY9zBiWJLJ7leSKSZUhooD1MaQUkR_fIZWZh-2eQnbPMVp9mFn2ufXXzySXqLl_wFI06f_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470628248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Greenfield, Jessica ; Traboulsi, Elias I ; Lombardo-Klefos, Krista ; Bierer, S Beth</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Jessica ; Traboulsi, Elias I ; Lombardo-Klefos, Krista ; Bierer, S Beth</creatorcontrib><description>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2374-8265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-8265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33324749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Association of American Medical Colleges</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; ACGME ; Evaluation ; Faculty Development ; Original Publication ; Program Evaluation ; Residency</subject><ispartof>MedEdPORTAL, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.11039-11039</ispartof><rights>2020 Greenfield et al.</rights><rights>2020 Greenfield et al. 2020 Greenfield et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2723-5550</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732133/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7732133/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traboulsi, Elias I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardo-Klefos, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierer, S Beth</creatorcontrib><title>Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees</title><title>MedEdPORTAL</title><addtitle>MedEdPORTAL</addtitle><description>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>ACGME</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Original Publication</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Residency</subject><issn>2374-8265</issn><issn>2374-8265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUV1P3DAQtKpWBR38g6rKY19C44849kslOF0pEohKbZ-tjb2-BiVxaicn8e9r7uAET17vzoy9M4R8otUFrRspvw44GcYbUSom6wtKK67fkdNj5_2r-oScp_RQVRXVWsuKfiQnnHMmGqFPCVxhmoufEezcWUyFD7G4WrredeO2gNEVv5ZpCnF-um68xwzbYXG5vr7blHd5DjO6TA_bCEOx2UG_wNyFsViHYejmGTGdkQ8e-oTnz-eK_Pm--b3-Ud7eX9-sL29Ly5XWpbKSWS3RU2hbUBLQ5oI13uUdvGq1kqpGx2rhwbUV9yA5aE2Z9lzW0PAVuTnougAPZordAPHRBOjMvhHi1kDew_ZoameFBi7QVVY0WkHNqaDgGisld-iy1reD1rS0AzqL4xyhfyP6djJ2f8027EzTcEazuyvy5Vkghn9LttgMXbLY9zBiWJLJ7leSKSZUhooD1MaQUkR_fIZWZh-2eQnbPMVp9mFn2ufXXzySXqLl_wFI06f_</recordid><startdate>20201210</startdate><enddate>20201210</enddate><creator>Greenfield, Jessica</creator><creator>Traboulsi, Elias I</creator><creator>Lombardo-Klefos, Krista</creator><creator>Bierer, S Beth</creator><general>Association of American Medical Colleges</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-5550</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201210</creationdate><title>Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees</title><author>Greenfield, Jessica ; Traboulsi, Elias I ; Lombardo-Klefos, Krista ; Bierer, S Beth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>ACGME</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Original Publication</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Residency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenfield, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traboulsi, Elias I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardo-Klefos, Krista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierer, S Beth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>MedEdPORTAL</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenfield, Jessica</au><au>Traboulsi, Elias I</au><au>Lombardo-Klefos, Krista</au><au>Bierer, S Beth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees</atitle><jtitle>MedEdPORTAL</jtitle><addtitle>MedEdPORTAL</addtitle><date>2020-12-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><spage>11039</spage><epage>11039</epage><pages>11039-11039</pages><issn>2374-8265</issn><eissn>2374-8265</eissn><abstract>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that residency training programs form program evaluation committees (PECs) to monitor program delivery and outcomes, generate annual program evaluations (APEs), facilitate strategic planning, and implement continuous quality improvement projects. Though PECs provide essential documentation to position programs for successful accreditation decisions, few resources exist in the literature for PEC members. Employing Kern's model for curriculum development, we conducted a needs assessment in 2016 that resulted in adding a 2-hour workshop on building and supporting effective PECs to a certificate program for residency program directors. The workshop used a flipped classroom model with prework readings and guiding questions to familiarize participants with ACGME requirements for PECs and APEs. Several activities helped participants identify best practices for PECs and discuss authentic examples of mission statements, APEs, and action plans. From 2017 to 2019, we offered this workshop on three different occasions to a total of 42 participants (34 residency program directors/associate program directors and eight program coordinators). In 2019, 14 participants completed a web-based evaluation after the session. All agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop met the learning objectives, utilized interactive teaching methods, included useful APE examples, and provided valuable resources. This workshop addresses a gap in the literature by helping program directors identify best practices for PECs. The APE template and workshop examples can be adjusted to fit the needs of individual institutions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Association of American Medical Colleges</pub><pmid>33324749</pmid><doi>10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11039</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-5550</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2374-8265
ispartof MedEdPORTAL, 2020-12, Vol.16, p.11039-11039
issn 2374-8265
2374-8265
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dc49a34ed0c4798a53141ad7c663ded
source PubMed Central
subjects Accreditation
ACGME
Evaluation
Faculty Development
Original Publication
Program Evaluation
Residency
title Best Practices for Building and Supporting Effective ACGME-Mandated Program Evaluation Committees
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A57%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20Practices%20for%20Building%20and%20Supporting%20Effective%20ACGME-Mandated%20Program%20Evaluation%20Committees&rft.jtitle=MedEdPORTAL&rft.au=Greenfield,%20Jessica&rft.date=2020-12-10&rft.volume=16&rft.spage=11039&rft.epage=11039&rft.pages=11039-11039&rft.issn=2374-8265&rft.eissn=2374-8265&rft_id=info:doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2470628248%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3899-8c62c96ef1abba86aecabb27fd826f8b98685ed254fadb03fa63a99129f365a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470628248&rft_id=info:pmid/33324749&rfr_iscdi=true