Loading…
Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development
In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913 |
container_end_page | 102 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Brazilian Journal of Political Economy |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Karo, Erkki Kattel, Rainer |
description | In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0101_31572014000100006</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1629327903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UV1LwzAULaLgnP4G--jDNu9Nm2Z9EWT4MRgoqM_hNh8jo2tq0w327802EUHMS3LPPefkfiTJNcIEeQm3b4CA4wy5YIA5QAzjKU6SwU_i9Nf7PLkIYQXASs6zQXL3uqlqp9I1NbQ0a9P0o7T1EdmlilpSrt-NUtc0fku9801KjU612Zrat3vyZXJmqQ7m6vseJh-PD--z5_Hi5Wk-u1-MVS5EMUbLObJC64qrzDA9ZUJABMlaUSEzFShODGMWWZVntpiCRYFFbkukrMRsmMyPvtrTSradW1O3k56cPAC-W0rqeqdqI7nWotJYMlZAbpBXxA1TxKZAgJTb6DU5egXlYh9y5TddE4uXh0nKP5OMgpujoO3858aEXq5dUKauqTF-EyQWrMyYKCGLVHGkqs6H0Bn7UyuC3K_r30--AM4Tg4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629327903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0101-3157</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1809-4538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0101-3157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Editora 34</publisher><subject>Asians ; Economic development ; economic planning ; ECONOMICS ; innovation ; Management ; political economy ; POLITICAL SCIENCE ; transition economies</subject><ispartof>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24149,27864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><title>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</title><addtitle>Brazil. J. Polit. Econ</addtitle><description>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>economic planning</subject><subject>ECONOMICS</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>political economy</subject><subject>POLITICAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>transition economies</subject><issn>0101-3157</issn><issn>1809-4538</issn><issn>0101-3157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UV1LwzAULaLgnP4G--jDNu9Nm2Z9EWT4MRgoqM_hNh8jo2tq0w327802EUHMS3LPPefkfiTJNcIEeQm3b4CA4wy5YIA5QAzjKU6SwU_i9Nf7PLkIYQXASs6zQXL3uqlqp9I1NbQ0a9P0o7T1EdmlilpSrt-NUtc0fku9801KjU612Zrat3vyZXJmqQ7m6vseJh-PD--z5_Hi5Wk-u1-MVS5EMUbLObJC64qrzDA9ZUJABMlaUSEzFShODGMWWZVntpiCRYFFbkukrMRsmMyPvtrTSradW1O3k56cPAC-W0rqeqdqI7nWotJYMlZAbpBXxA1TxKZAgJTb6DU5egXlYh9y5TddE4uXh0nKP5OMgpujoO3858aEXq5dUKauqTF-EyQWrMyYKCGLVHGkqs6H0Bn7UyuC3K_r30--AM4Tg4Q</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Karo, Erkki</creator><creator>Kattel, Rainer</creator><general>Editora 34</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><author>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>economic planning</topic><topic>ECONOMICS</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>political economy</topic><topic>POLITICAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>transition economies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karo, Erkki</au><au>Kattel, Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</jtitle><addtitle>Brazil. J. Polit. Econ</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>80-102</pages><issn>0101-3157</issn><issn>1809-4538</issn><eissn>0101-3157</eissn><abstract>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><pub>Editora 34</pub><doi>10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0101-3157 |
ispartof | Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102 |
issn | 0101-3157 1809-4538 0101-3157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; PAIS Index; SciELO |
subjects | Asians Economic development economic planning ECONOMICS innovation Management political economy POLITICAL SCIENCE transition economies |
title | Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20management,%20policy%20capacity,%20innovation%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Economy&rft.au=Karo,%20Erkki&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=80-102&rft.issn=0101-3157&rft.eissn=0101-3157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1629327903%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629327903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0101_31572014000100006&rfr_iscdi=true |