Loading…

Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development

In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102
Main Authors: Karo, Erkki, Kattel, Rainer
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
container_volume 34
creator Karo, Erkki
Kattel, Rainer
description In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0101_31572014000100006</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1629327903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UV1LwzAULaLgnP4G--jDNu9Nm2Z9EWT4MRgoqM_hNh8jo2tq0w327802EUHMS3LPPefkfiTJNcIEeQm3b4CA4wy5YIA5QAzjKU6SwU_i9Nf7PLkIYQXASs6zQXL3uqlqp9I1NbQ0a9P0o7T1EdmlilpSrt-NUtc0fku9801KjU612Zrat3vyZXJmqQ7m6vseJh-PD--z5_Hi5Wk-u1-MVS5EMUbLObJC64qrzDA9ZUJABMlaUSEzFShODGMWWZVntpiCRYFFbkukrMRsmMyPvtrTSradW1O3k56cPAC-W0rqeqdqI7nWotJYMlZAbpBXxA1TxKZAgJTb6DU5egXlYh9y5TddE4uXh0nKP5OMgpujoO3858aEXq5dUKauqTF-EyQWrMyYKCGLVHGkqs6H0Bn7UyuC3K_r30--AM4Tg4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1629327903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SciELO</source><creator>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</creator><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0101-3157</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1809-4538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0101-3157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Editora 34</publisher><subject>Asians ; Economic development ; economic planning ; ECONOMICS ; innovation ; Management ; political economy ; POLITICAL SCIENCE ; transition economies</subject><ispartof>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,24149,27864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><title>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</title><addtitle>Brazil. J. Polit. Econ</addtitle><description>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Asians</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>economic planning</subject><subject>ECONOMICS</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>political economy</subject><subject>POLITICAL SCIENCE</subject><subject>transition economies</subject><issn>0101-3157</issn><issn>1809-4538</issn><issn>0101-3157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UV1LwzAULaLgnP4G--jDNu9Nm2Z9EWT4MRgoqM_hNh8jo2tq0w327802EUHMS3LPPefkfiTJNcIEeQm3b4CA4wy5YIA5QAzjKU6SwU_i9Nf7PLkIYQXASs6zQXL3uqlqp9I1NbQ0a9P0o7T1EdmlilpSrt-NUtc0fku9801KjU612Zrat3vyZXJmqQ7m6vseJh-PD--z5_Hi5Wk-u1-MVS5EMUbLObJC64qrzDA9ZUJABMlaUSEzFShODGMWWZVntpiCRYFFbkukrMRsmMyPvtrTSradW1O3k56cPAC-W0rqeqdqI7nWotJYMlZAbpBXxA1TxKZAgJTb6DU5egXlYh9y5TddE4uXh0nKP5OMgpujoO3858aEXq5dUKauqTF-EyQWrMyYKCGLVHGkqs6H0Bn7UyuC3K_r30--AM4Tg4Q</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Karo, Erkki</creator><creator>Kattel, Rainer</creator><general>Editora 34</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</title><author>Karo, Erkki ; Kattel, Rainer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Asians</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>economic planning</topic><topic>ECONOMICS</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>political economy</topic><topic>POLITICAL SCIENCE</topic><topic>transition economies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karo, Erkki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kattel, Rainer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karo, Erkki</au><au>Kattel, Rainer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian Journal of Political Economy</jtitle><addtitle>Brazil. J. Polit. Econ</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>80-102</pages><issn>0101-3157</issn><issn>1809-4538</issn><eissn>0101-3157</eissn><abstract>In this paper we discuss the question of what factors in development policy create specific forms of policy capacity and under what circumstances developmentoriented complementarities or mismatches between the public and private sectors emerge. We argue that specific forms of policy capacity emerge from three interlinked policy choices, each fundamentally evolutionary in nature: policy choices on understanding the nature and sources of technical change and innovation; on the ways of financing economic growth, in particular technical change; and on the nature of public management to deliver and implement both previous sets of policy choices. Thus, policy capacity is not so much a continuum of abilities (from less to more), but rather a variety of modes of making policy that originate from co-evolutionary processes in capitalist development. To illustrate, we briefly reflect upon how the East Asian developmental states of the 1960s-1980s and Eastern European transition policies since the 1990s led to almost opposite institutional systems for financing, designing and managing development strategies, and how this led, through co-evolutionary processes, to different forms of policy capacity. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><pub>Editora 34</pub><doi>10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0101-3157
ispartof Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2014-01, Vol.34 (1), p.80-102
issn 0101-3157
1809-4538
0101-3157
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5dd7bd1922604e15ba5e2ca280a01a4f
source EconLit s plnými texty; PAIS Index; SciELO
subjects Asians
Economic development
economic planning
ECONOMICS
innovation
Management
political economy
POLITICAL SCIENCE
transition economies
title Public management, policy capacity, innovation and development
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20management,%20policy%20capacity,%20innovation%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Economy&rft.au=Karo,%20Erkki&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=80-102&rft.issn=0101-3157&rft.eissn=0101-3157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S0101-31572014000100006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1629327903%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4776-1f55126ddb5c3e2d827701f5aff7b12eb0c5a21b5c12b43f680f17164f91a3913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1629327903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_scielo_id=S0101_31572014000100006&rfr_iscdi=true