Loading…
Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses
Different types of natural events hit the United States every year. The data of natural hazards from 1900 to 2016 in the US shows that there is an increasing trend in annul natural disaster losses after 1980. Climate change is recognized as one of the factors causing this trend, and predictive analy...
Saved in:
Published in: | Risks (Basel) 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), p.1-23 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3 |
container_end_page | 23 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Risks (Basel) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Deng, Min Aminzadeh, Mostafa Ji, Min |
description | Different types of natural events hit the United States every year. The data of natural hazards from 1900 to 2016 in the US shows that there is an increasing trend in annul natural disaster losses after 1980. Climate change is recognized as one of the factors causing this trend, and predictive analysis of natural losses becomes important in loss prediction and risk prevention as this trend continues. In this paper, we convert natural disaster losses to the year 2016 dollars using yearly average Consumers Price Index (CPI), and conduct several tests to verify that the CPI adjusted amounts of loss from individual natural disasters are independent and identically distributed. Based on these test results, we use various model selection quantities to find the best model for the natural loss severity among three composite distributions, namely Exponential-Pareto, Inverse Gamma-Pareto, and Lognormal-Pareto. These composite distributions model piecewise small losses with high frequency and large losses with low frequency. Remarkably, we make the first attempt to derive analytical Bayesian estimate of the Lognormal-Pareto distribution based on the selected priors, and show that the Lognormal-Pareto distribution outperforms the other two composite distributions in modeling natural disaster losses. Important risk measures for natural disasters are thereafter derived and discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/risks9010012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e75e3f145ed44feb79642107bfc0209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e75e3f145ed44feb79642107bfc0209</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2475631869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxRdRsGhvXoUFr1Yz2Xxsjip-FApe9ByyyURS16ZmtkL_e7dWxLm8Yfjxhveq6gzYVdMYdl0SvZNhwBjwg2rCOdczwwwc_tuPqynRko1joGkVm1T61m2RklvV64Ih-SF9Ye1Wrt9SojrHeuWGTXF9HRI5GrDUfSZCOq2OousJp796Ur0-3L_cPc0Wz4_zu5vFzAtthpmQoQ3YBWQtBCWjiJ3SnocQGID2JmroFGCEDk0wUjbCOS-kQsUDtOCbk2q-9w3ZLe26pA9Xtja7ZH8OubxZV4bke7QStcQmgpAYhIjYaaMEB6a76BlnZvS62HutS_7cIA12mTdlzEqWCy1VA63aUZd7ypcxacH49xWY3TVt_zc94ud7HH1eJbI7oSEXy2ULjDfffXx6-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475631869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Deng, Min ; Aminzadeh, Mostafa ; Ji, Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Deng, Min ; Aminzadeh, Mostafa ; Ji, Min</creatorcontrib><description>Different types of natural events hit the United States every year. The data of natural hazards from 1900 to 2016 in the US shows that there is an increasing trend in annul natural disaster losses after 1980. Climate change is recognized as one of the factors causing this trend, and predictive analysis of natural losses becomes important in loss prediction and risk prevention as this trend continues. In this paper, we convert natural disaster losses to the year 2016 dollars using yearly average Consumers Price Index (CPI), and conduct several tests to verify that the CPI adjusted amounts of loss from individual natural disasters are independent and identically distributed. Based on these test results, we use various model selection quantities to find the best model for the natural loss severity among three composite distributions, namely Exponential-Pareto, Inverse Gamma-Pareto, and Lognormal-Pareto. These composite distributions model piecewise small losses with high frequency and large losses with low frequency. Remarkably, we make the first attempt to derive analytical Bayesian estimate of the Lognormal-Pareto distribution based on the selected priors, and show that the Lognormal-Pareto distribution outperforms the other two composite distributions in modeling natural disaster losses. Important risk measures for natural disasters are thereafter derived and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/risks9010012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI</publisher><subject>bayesian inference ; climate change ; composite distributions ; Disasters ; Hurricanes ; natural disaster ; predictive analysis ; Random variables ; risk measures ; Storm damage</subject><ispartof>Risks (Basel), 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), p.1-23</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4827-6351 ; 0000-0001-6076-7762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2475631869/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2475631869?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,25752,27923,27924,36059,37011,44362,44589,74666,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deng, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminzadeh, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Min</creatorcontrib><title>Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses</title><title>Risks (Basel)</title><description>Different types of natural events hit the United States every year. The data of natural hazards from 1900 to 2016 in the US shows that there is an increasing trend in annul natural disaster losses after 1980. Climate change is recognized as one of the factors causing this trend, and predictive analysis of natural losses becomes important in loss prediction and risk prevention as this trend continues. In this paper, we convert natural disaster losses to the year 2016 dollars using yearly average Consumers Price Index (CPI), and conduct several tests to verify that the CPI adjusted amounts of loss from individual natural disasters are independent and identically distributed. Based on these test results, we use various model selection quantities to find the best model for the natural loss severity among three composite distributions, namely Exponential-Pareto, Inverse Gamma-Pareto, and Lognormal-Pareto. These composite distributions model piecewise small losses with high frequency and large losses with low frequency. Remarkably, we make the first attempt to derive analytical Bayesian estimate of the Lognormal-Pareto distribution based on the selected priors, and show that the Lognormal-Pareto distribution outperforms the other two composite distributions in modeling natural disaster losses. Important risk measures for natural disasters are thereafter derived and discussed.</description><subject>bayesian inference</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>composite distributions</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>natural disaster</subject><subject>predictive analysis</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>risk measures</subject><subject>Storm damage</subject><issn>2227-9091</issn><issn>2227-9091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1LAzEQxRdRsGhvXoUFr1Yz2Xxsjip-FApe9ByyyURS16ZmtkL_e7dWxLm8Yfjxhveq6gzYVdMYdl0SvZNhwBjwg2rCOdczwwwc_tuPqynRko1joGkVm1T61m2RklvV64Ih-SF9Ye1Wrt9SojrHeuWGTXF9HRI5GrDUfSZCOq2OousJp796Ur0-3L_cPc0Wz4_zu5vFzAtthpmQoQ3YBWQtBCWjiJ3SnocQGID2JmroFGCEDk0wUjbCOS-kQsUDtOCbk2q-9w3ZLe26pA9Xtja7ZH8OubxZV4bke7QStcQmgpAYhIjYaaMEB6a76BlnZvS62HutS_7cIA12mTdlzEqWCy1VA63aUZd7ypcxacH49xWY3TVt_zc94ud7HH1eJbI7oSEXy2ULjDfffXx6-g</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Deng, Min</creator><creator>Aminzadeh, Mostafa</creator><creator>Ji, Min</creator><general>MDPI</general><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-6351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-7762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses</title><author>Deng, Min ; Aminzadeh, Mostafa ; Ji, Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>bayesian inference</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>composite distributions</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>natural disaster</topic><topic>predictive analysis</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>risk measures</topic><topic>Storm damage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deng, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminzadeh, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Min</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Risks (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deng, Min</au><au>Aminzadeh, Mostafa</au><au>Ji, Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses</atitle><jtitle>Risks (Basel)</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>1-23</pages><issn>2227-9091</issn><eissn>2227-9091</eissn><abstract>Different types of natural events hit the United States every year. The data of natural hazards from 1900 to 2016 in the US shows that there is an increasing trend in annul natural disaster losses after 1980. Climate change is recognized as one of the factors causing this trend, and predictive analysis of natural losses becomes important in loss prediction and risk prevention as this trend continues. In this paper, we convert natural disaster losses to the year 2016 dollars using yearly average Consumers Price Index (CPI), and conduct several tests to verify that the CPI adjusted amounts of loss from individual natural disasters are independent and identically distributed. Based on these test results, we use various model selection quantities to find the best model for the natural loss severity among three composite distributions, namely Exponential-Pareto, Inverse Gamma-Pareto, and Lognormal-Pareto. These composite distributions model piecewise small losses with high frequency and large losses with low frequency. Remarkably, we make the first attempt to derive analytical Bayesian estimate of the Lognormal-Pareto distribution based on the selected priors, and show that the Lognormal-Pareto distribution outperforms the other two composite distributions in modeling natural disaster losses. Important risk measures for natural disasters are thereafter derived and discussed.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><doi>10.3390/risks9010012</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4827-6351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-7762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9091 |
ispartof | Risks (Basel), 2021-01, Vol.9 (1), p.1-23 |
issn | 2227-9091 2227-9091 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e75e3f145ed44feb79642107bfc0209 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; ABI/INFORM Global; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | bayesian inference climate change composite distributions Disasters Hurricanes natural disaster predictive analysis Random variables risk measures Storm damage |
title | Bayesian predictive analysis of natural disaster losses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A42%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayesian%20predictive%20analysis%20of%20natural%20disaster%20losses&rft.jtitle=Risks%20(Basel)&rft.au=Deng,%20Min&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=1-23&rft.issn=2227-9091&rft.eissn=2227-9091&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/risks9010012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2475631869%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-45d8debde081d65f4fb67c2ddd0117c9f71b61ef1be9d95534aac456e62d181c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475631869&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |