Loading…

Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge

Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as source...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and translational allergy 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a
Main Authors: Olivieri, Bianca, Gil, Ana Jimenez, Stoenchev, Kostadin, Durham, Stephen R., Scadding, Guy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e12360
container_title Clinical and translational allergy
container_volume 14
creator Olivieri, Bianca
Gil, Ana Jimenez
Stoenchev, Kostadin
Durham, Stephen R.
Scadding, Guy
description Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR. Methods Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses. Results Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics. Conclusion For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/clt2.12360
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3059257157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIwBsRtuZrZpIrkcXWwoI37XXIx5nZLJlJTWZW119vtlNL64UHQk5OnrxJDm9VvSX4gmBMP9kw0QtCWYNfVKcU83rVYkpfPslPqvOcd7hELcoR_Lo6YaJtZSvYafX7dvLBTwcUO5R92ENCxie7RXp0aBvnDMjNeUKDnwDBrylpO2XkIPk9ONSlOKDgLYy5rPJsgh_7WQc0aROggF1MaNS5VHQIkHoYkd0e07GHN9WrTocM5w_zWXV7-fVm_W21-X51vf6yWVnecrwi2jjCXFM7EEw21gAlVkghJBjuWilkzXljdCNtJ2TDhaBMMmEE4MYRrtlZdb3ouqh36i75QaeDitqr-0JMvdJp8jaAqkECc4a1XFiuAaQhLZeMNJhY15K6aH1etO5mM4ArHy8dCc9En--Mfqv6uFekBOUYF4UPDwop_pghT2rw2UIIeoTSbsVwLWld7moL-v4fdBfnNJZeFUrwMgg5Uh8XyqaYc4Lu8TUEq6NF1NEi6t4iBX739P2P6F9DFIAswE8f4PAfKbXe3NBF9A9h4sa6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084308117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR. Methods Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses. Results Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics. Conclusion For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38779783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>allergen immunotherapy ; Allergens ; allergic rhinitis ; Allergies ; Asthma ; birch pollen ; house dust mite ; Immunotherapy ; Licenses ; nasal allergen challenge ; Nose ; Original ; Rhinitis ; Standardization ; Steroids</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational allergy, 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084308117/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084308117?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11543,25733,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,46030,46454,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38779783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><title>Clinical and translational allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Allergy</addtitle><description>Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR. Methods Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses. Results Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics. Conclusion For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</description><subject>allergen immunotherapy</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>allergic rhinitis</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>birch pollen</subject><subject>house dust mite</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>nasal allergen challenge</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Rhinitis</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><issn>2045-7022</issn><issn>2045-7022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIwBsRtuZrZpIrkcXWwoI37XXIx5nZLJlJTWZW119vtlNL64UHQk5OnrxJDm9VvSX4gmBMP9kw0QtCWYNfVKcU83rVYkpfPslPqvOcd7hELcoR_Lo6YaJtZSvYafX7dvLBTwcUO5R92ENCxie7RXp0aBvnDMjNeUKDnwDBrylpO2XkIPk9ONSlOKDgLYy5rPJsgh_7WQc0aROggF1MaNS5VHQIkHoYkd0e07GHN9WrTocM5w_zWXV7-fVm_W21-X51vf6yWVnecrwi2jjCXFM7EEw21gAlVkghJBjuWilkzXljdCNtJ2TDhaBMMmEE4MYRrtlZdb3ouqh36i75QaeDitqr-0JMvdJp8jaAqkECc4a1XFiuAaQhLZeMNJhY15K6aH1etO5mM4ArHy8dCc9En--Mfqv6uFekBOUYF4UPDwop_pghT2rw2UIIeoTSbsVwLWld7moL-v4fdBfnNJZeFUrwMgg5Uh8XyqaYc4Lu8TUEq6NF1NEi6t4iBX739P2P6F9DFIAswE8f4PAfKbXe3NBF9A9h4sa6</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Olivieri, Bianca</creator><creator>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creator><creator>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creator><creator>Durham, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Scadding, Guy</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><author>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>allergen immunotherapy</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>allergic rhinitis</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>birch pollen</topic><topic>house dust mite</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>nasal allergen challenge</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Rhinitis</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olivieri, Bianca</au><au>Gil, Ana Jimenez</au><au>Stoenchev, Kostadin</au><au>Durham, Stephen R.</au><au>Scadding, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Allergy</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e12360</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12360-n/a</pages><issn>2045-7022</issn><eissn>2045-7022</eissn><abstract>Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR. Methods Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses. Results Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics. Conclusion For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38779783</pmid><doi>10.1002/clt2.12360</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7022
ispartof Clinical and translational allergy, 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a
issn 2045-7022
2045-7022
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects allergen immunotherapy
Allergens
allergic rhinitis
Allergies
Asthma
birch pollen
house dust mite
Immunotherapy
Licenses
nasal allergen challenge
Nose
Original
Rhinitis
Standardization
Steroids
title Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A45%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20silver%20birch%20and%20house%20dust%20mite%20extracts%20derived%20from%20licensed%20sublingual%20tablets%20for%20nasal%20allergen%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20allergy&rft.au=Olivieri,%20Bianca&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e12360&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12360-n/a&rft.issn=2045-7022&rft.eissn=2045-7022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/clt2.12360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3059257157%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084308117&rft_id=info:pmid/38779783&rfr_iscdi=true