Loading…
Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge
Background Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as source...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical and translational allergy 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e12360 |
container_title | Clinical and translational allergy |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Olivieri, Bianca Gil, Ana Jimenez Stoenchev, Kostadin Durham, Stephen R. Scadding, Guy |
description | Background
Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR.
Methods
Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses.
Results
Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics.
Conclusion
For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/clt2.12360 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3059257157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIwBsRtuZrZpIrkcXWwoI37XXIx5nZLJlJTWZW119vtlNL64UHQk5OnrxJDm9VvSX4gmBMP9kw0QtCWYNfVKcU83rVYkpfPslPqvOcd7hELcoR_Lo6YaJtZSvYafX7dvLBTwcUO5R92ENCxie7RXp0aBvnDMjNeUKDnwDBrylpO2XkIPk9ONSlOKDgLYy5rPJsgh_7WQc0aROggF1MaNS5VHQIkHoYkd0e07GHN9WrTocM5w_zWXV7-fVm_W21-X51vf6yWVnecrwi2jjCXFM7EEw21gAlVkghJBjuWilkzXljdCNtJ2TDhaBMMmEE4MYRrtlZdb3ouqh36i75QaeDitqr-0JMvdJp8jaAqkECc4a1XFiuAaQhLZeMNJhY15K6aH1etO5mM4ArHy8dCc9En--Mfqv6uFekBOUYF4UPDwop_pghT2rw2UIIeoTSbsVwLWld7moL-v4fdBfnNJZeFUrwMgg5Uh8XyqaYc4Lu8TUEq6NF1NEi6t4iBX739P2P6F9DFIAswE8f4PAfKbXe3NBF9A9h4sa6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084308117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR.
Methods
Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses.
Results
Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics.
Conclusion
For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38779783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>allergen immunotherapy ; Allergens ; allergic rhinitis ; Allergies ; Asthma ; birch pollen ; house dust mite ; Immunotherapy ; Licenses ; nasal allergen challenge ; Nose ; Original ; Rhinitis ; Standardization ; Steroids</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational allergy, 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084308117/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3084308117?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11543,25733,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,46030,46454,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38779783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><title>Clinical and translational allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Allergy</addtitle><description>Background
Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR.
Methods
Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses.
Results
Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics.
Conclusion
For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</description><subject>allergen immunotherapy</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>allergic rhinitis</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>birch pollen</subject><subject>house dust mite</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>nasal allergen challenge</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Rhinitis</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><issn>2045-7022</issn><issn>2045-7022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rFDEUhgdRbKm98QdIwBsRtuZrZpIrkcXWwoI37XXIx5nZLJlJTWZW119vtlNL64UHQk5OnrxJDm9VvSX4gmBMP9kw0QtCWYNfVKcU83rVYkpfPslPqvOcd7hELcoR_Lo6YaJtZSvYafX7dvLBTwcUO5R92ENCxie7RXp0aBvnDMjNeUKDnwDBrylpO2XkIPk9ONSlOKDgLYy5rPJsgh_7WQc0aROggF1MaNS5VHQIkHoYkd0e07GHN9WrTocM5w_zWXV7-fVm_W21-X51vf6yWVnecrwi2jjCXFM7EEw21gAlVkghJBjuWilkzXljdCNtJ2TDhaBMMmEE4MYRrtlZdb3ouqh36i75QaeDitqr-0JMvdJp8jaAqkECc4a1XFiuAaQhLZeMNJhY15K6aH1etO5mM4ArHy8dCc9En--Mfqv6uFekBOUYF4UPDwop_pghT2rw2UIIeoTSbsVwLWld7moL-v4fdBfnNJZeFUrwMgg5Uh8XyqaYc4Lu8TUEq6NF1NEi6t4iBX739P2P6F9DFIAswE8f4PAfKbXe3NBF9A9h4sa6</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Olivieri, Bianca</creator><creator>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creator><creator>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creator><creator>Durham, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Scadding, Guy</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</title><author>Olivieri, Bianca ; Gil, Ana Jimenez ; Stoenchev, Kostadin ; Durham, Stephen R. ; Scadding, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>allergen immunotherapy</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>allergic rhinitis</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>birch pollen</topic><topic>house dust mite</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>nasal allergen challenge</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Rhinitis</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Ana Jimenez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoenchev, Kostadin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scadding, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals - May need to register for free articles</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olivieri, Bianca</au><au>Gil, Ana Jimenez</au><au>Stoenchev, Kostadin</au><au>Durham, Stephen R.</au><au>Scadding, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Allergy</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e12360</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e12360-n/a</pages><issn>2045-7022</issn><eissn>2045-7022</eissn><abstract>Background
Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose‐responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR.
Methods
Sixteen volunteers with HDM‐induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen‐induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up‐dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0–12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (“provoking dose 7”) in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the “provoking dose 7” were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The “provoking dose 7” of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non‐HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses.
Results
Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non‐allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics.
Conclusion
For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate‐severity response (“provoking dose 7/12”) was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38779783</pmid><doi>10.1002/clt2.12360</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-6774</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7022 |
ispartof | Clinical and translational allergy, 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.e12360-n/a |
issn | 2045-7022 2045-7022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5e9e3db3748c4aee9b174931601cd715 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | allergen immunotherapy Allergens allergic rhinitis Allergies Asthma birch pollen house dust mite Immunotherapy Licenses nasal allergen challenge Nose Original Rhinitis Standardization Steroids |
title | Utility of silver birch and house dust mite extracts derived from licensed sublingual tablets for nasal allergen challenge |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A45%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20silver%20birch%20and%20house%20dust%20mite%20extracts%20derived%20from%20licensed%20sublingual%20tablets%20for%20nasal%20allergen%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20allergy&rft.au=Olivieri,%20Bianca&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e12360&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e12360-n/a&rft.issn=2045-7022&rft.eissn=2045-7022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/clt2.12360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3059257157%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-1abd13d65de8396cbe21c89889eb4d79895446ba69cf89648823938b8e06d14a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084308117&rft_id=info:pmid/38779783&rfr_iscdi=true |