Loading…

In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties

Background The study here investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to assess tumour response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment in vivo. Mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were exposed to various treatment conditions including 1% (v/v) Defi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC cancer 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-10, Article 991
Main Authors: Sharma, Deepa, Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar, Faltyn, Mateusz, Giles, Anoja, Stanisz, Martin, Czarnota, Gregory J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title BMC cancer
container_volume 21
creator Sharma, Deepa
Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar
Faltyn, Mateusz
Giles, Anoja
Stanisz, Martin
Czarnota, Gregory J
description Background The study here investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to assess tumour response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment in vivo. Mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were exposed to various treatment conditions including 1% (v/v) Definity microbubbles stimulated at ultrasound pressures 246 kPa and 570 kPa and HT duration of 0, 10, 40, and 50 min. Ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data were collected using an ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 25 MHz. QUS parameters based on form factor models were used as potential biomarkers of cell death in prostate cancer xenografts. Results The average acoustic concentration (AAC) parameter from spherical gaussian and the fluid-filled spherical models were the most efficient imaging biomarker of cell death. Statistical significant increases of AAC were found in the combined treatment groups: 246 kPa + 40 min, 246 kPa + 50 min, and 570 kPa + 50 min, in comparison with control tumours (0 kPa + 0 min). Changes in AAC correlates strongly (r.sup.2 = 0.62) with cell death fraction quantified from the histopathological analysis. Conclusion Scattering property estimates from spherical gaussian and fluid-filled spherical models are useful imaging biomarkers for assessing tumour response to treatment. Our observation of changes in AAC from high ultrasound frequencies was consistent with previous findings where parameters related to the backscatter intensity (AAC) increased with cell death. Keywords: Cell death, Hyperthermia, Prostate cancer, Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12885-021-08706-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5ef0a2e367504f978d9b0e6476bc0e6f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A675232107</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5ef0a2e367504f978d9b0e6476bc0e6f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A675232107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7wqCIIXXZM0adIbYVn8GFgQ_LgOp2kyk6WTzOakg3rnPzezM-gWbC9Sznny9DR9q-olJZeUqu4tUqaUaAijDVGSdI18VJ1TLmnDOJGPHzyfVc8QbwmhUhH1tDprOZc9V_y8-r0K9d7vYw2IFnFrQ66jq3cpYoZsawPB2FQni7sY0NYz-rCu72YI2RfA70tpygkwzmGszQYSmGyT_1V6MRxUp3bwpkYD-dAshvKCnU3ZW3xePXEwoX1xWi-q7x_ef7v-1Nx8_ri6vrppTEdEblw_GjCOtxIAOk5HVy4mZdcRqfhIVd8PggvaDq5lglLZgREARjqQQg1De1Gtjt4xwq3eJb-F9FNH8Pq-ENNaQxnITFYL6wgw23ZSEO56qcZ-ILbjshtMWV1xvTu6dvOwtaMpp5ZgWkiXneA3eh33WnEq-64tglcnQYp3s8Wsb-OcQvl-zYTkXDDK-D9qDWUqH1wsMrP1aPRVmY21jBJZqMv_UOUe7dabGKzzpb7Y8GaxoTDZ_shrmBH16uuXJfv6AbuxMOUNxmk-_F1cguwImhIdTNb9PQ1K9CGu-hhXXeKq7-OqZfsHcJ3d9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574452124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharma, Deepa ; Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar ; Faltyn, Mateusz ; Giles, Anoja ; Stanisz, Martin ; Czarnota, Gregory J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Deepa ; Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar ; Faltyn, Mateusz ; Giles, Anoja ; Stanisz, Martin ; Czarnota, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><description>Background The study here investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to assess tumour response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment in vivo. Mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were exposed to various treatment conditions including 1% (v/v) Definity microbubbles stimulated at ultrasound pressures 246 kPa and 570 kPa and HT duration of 0, 10, 40, and 50 min. Ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data were collected using an ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 25 MHz. QUS parameters based on form factor models were used as potential biomarkers of cell death in prostate cancer xenografts. Results The average acoustic concentration (AAC) parameter from spherical gaussian and the fluid-filled spherical models were the most efficient imaging biomarker of cell death. Statistical significant increases of AAC were found in the combined treatment groups: 246 kPa + 40 min, 246 kPa + 50 min, and 570 kPa + 50 min, in comparison with control tumours (0 kPa + 0 min). Changes in AAC correlates strongly (r.sup.2 = 0.62) with cell death fraction quantified from the histopathological analysis. Conclusion Scattering property estimates from spherical gaussian and fluid-filled spherical models are useful imaging biomarkers for assessing tumour response to treatment. Our observation of changes in AAC from high ultrasound frequencies was consistent with previous findings where parameters related to the backscatter intensity (AAC) increased with cell death. Keywords: Cell death, Hyperthermia, Prostate cancer, Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08706-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34479484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Apoptosis ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Catheters ; Cell death ; Chemotherapy ; Development and progression ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; Hyperthermia ; Medical imaging ; Morphology ; Prostate cancer ; Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic waves ; Ultrasound ; Xenografts</subject><ispartof>BMC cancer, 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-10, Article 991</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417963/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2574452124?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faltyn, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Anoja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanisz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnota, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties</title><title>BMC cancer</title><description>Background The study here investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to assess tumour response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment in vivo. Mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were exposed to various treatment conditions including 1% (v/v) Definity microbubbles stimulated at ultrasound pressures 246 kPa and 570 kPa and HT duration of 0, 10, 40, and 50 min. Ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data were collected using an ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 25 MHz. QUS parameters based on form factor models were used as potential biomarkers of cell death in prostate cancer xenografts. Results The average acoustic concentration (AAC) parameter from spherical gaussian and the fluid-filled spherical models were the most efficient imaging biomarker of cell death. Statistical significant increases of AAC were found in the combined treatment groups: 246 kPa + 40 min, 246 kPa + 50 min, and 570 kPa + 50 min, in comparison with control tumours (0 kPa + 0 min). Changes in AAC correlates strongly (r.sup.2 = 0.62) with cell death fraction quantified from the histopathological analysis. Conclusion Scattering property estimates from spherical gaussian and fluid-filled spherical models are useful imaging biomarkers for assessing tumour response to treatment. Our observation of changes in AAC from high ultrasound frequencies was consistent with previous findings where parameters related to the backscatter intensity (AAC) increased with cell death. Keywords: Cell death, Hyperthermia, Prostate cancer, Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hyperthermia</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic waves</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Xenografts</subject><issn>1471-2407</issn><issn>1471-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7wqCIIXXZM0adIbYVn8GFgQ_LgOp2kyk6WTzOakg3rnPzezM-gWbC9Sznny9DR9q-olJZeUqu4tUqaUaAijDVGSdI18VJ1TLmnDOJGPHzyfVc8QbwmhUhH1tDprOZc9V_y8-r0K9d7vYw2IFnFrQ66jq3cpYoZsawPB2FQni7sY0NYz-rCu72YI2RfA70tpygkwzmGszQYSmGyT_1V6MRxUp3bwpkYD-dAshvKCnU3ZW3xePXEwoX1xWi-q7x_ef7v-1Nx8_ri6vrppTEdEblw_GjCOtxIAOk5HVy4mZdcRqfhIVd8PggvaDq5lglLZgREARjqQQg1De1Gtjt4xwq3eJb-F9FNH8Pq-ENNaQxnITFYL6wgw23ZSEO56qcZ-ILbjshtMWV1xvTu6dvOwtaMpp5ZgWkiXneA3eh33WnEq-64tglcnQYp3s8Wsb-OcQvl-zYTkXDDK-D9qDWUqH1wsMrP1aPRVmY21jBJZqMv_UOUe7dabGKzzpb7Y8GaxoTDZ_shrmBH16uuXJfv6AbuxMOUNxmk-_F1cguwImhIdTNb9PQ1K9CGu-hhXXeKq7-OqZfsHcJ3d9Q</recordid><startdate>20210903</startdate><enddate>20210903</enddate><creator>Sharma, Deepa</creator><creator>Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar</creator><creator>Faltyn, Mateusz</creator><creator>Giles, Anoja</creator><creator>Stanisz, Martin</creator><creator>Czarnota, Gregory J</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210903</creationdate><title>In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties</title><author>Sharma, Deepa ; Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar ; Faltyn, Mateusz ; Giles, Anoja ; Stanisz, Martin ; Czarnota, Gregory J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hyperthermia</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic waves</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Xenografts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faltyn, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Anoja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanisz, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnota, Gregory J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Deepa</au><au>Osapoetra, Laurentius Oscar</au><au>Faltyn, Mateusz</au><au>Giles, Anoja</au><au>Stanisz, Martin</au><au>Czarnota, Gregory J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties</atitle><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle><date>2021-09-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><artnum>991</artnum><issn>1471-2407</issn><eissn>1471-2407</eissn><abstract>Background The study here investigated quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters to assess tumour response to ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) and hyperthermia (HT) treatment in vivo. Mice bearing prostate cancer xenografts were exposed to various treatment conditions including 1% (v/v) Definity microbubbles stimulated at ultrasound pressures 246 kPa and 570 kPa and HT duration of 0, 10, 40, and 50 min. Ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) data were collected using an ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 25 MHz. QUS parameters based on form factor models were used as potential biomarkers of cell death in prostate cancer xenografts. Results The average acoustic concentration (AAC) parameter from spherical gaussian and the fluid-filled spherical models were the most efficient imaging biomarker of cell death. Statistical significant increases of AAC were found in the combined treatment groups: 246 kPa + 40 min, 246 kPa + 50 min, and 570 kPa + 50 min, in comparison with control tumours (0 kPa + 0 min). Changes in AAC correlates strongly (r.sup.2 = 0.62) with cell death fraction quantified from the histopathological analysis. Conclusion Scattering property estimates from spherical gaussian and fluid-filled spherical models are useful imaging biomarkers for assessing tumour response to treatment. Our observation of changes in AAC from high ultrasound frequencies was consistent with previous findings where parameters related to the backscatter intensity (AAC) increased with cell death. Keywords: Cell death, Hyperthermia, Prostate cancer, Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>34479484</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12885-021-08706-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2407
ispartof BMC cancer, 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-10, Article 991
issn 1471-2407
1471-2407
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5ef0a2e367504f978d9b0e6476bc0e6f
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Acoustics
Apoptosis
Biomarkers
Biopsy
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Catheters
Cell death
Chemotherapy
Development and progression
Diagnosis
Health aspects
Hyperthermia
Medical imaging
Morphology
Prostate cancer
Quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy
Spectrum analysis
Statistical analysis
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic waves
Ultrasound
Xenografts
title In vivo assessment of prostate cancer response using quantitative ultrasound characterization of ultrasonic scattering properties
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20assessment%20of%20prostate%20cancer%20response%20using%20quantitative%20ultrasound%20characterization%20of%20ultrasonic%20scattering%20properties&rft.jtitle=BMC%20cancer&rft.au=Sharma,%20Deepa&rft.date=2021-09-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.artnum=991&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12885-021-08706-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA675232107%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-f9dcacf437aaa641dffff277660784d1899b54513bf3251176ac5aac7fa758bb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574452124&rft_id=info:pmid/34479484&rft_galeid=A675232107&rfr_iscdi=true