Loading…

Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)

The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting du...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-09, Vol.12 (1), p.15259-15259, Article 15259
Main Authors: Seltmann, Anne, Troxell, Sara A., Schad, Julia, Fritze, Marcus, Bailey, Liam D., Voigt, Christian C., Czirják, Gábor Á.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703
container_end_page 15259
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15259
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 12
creator Seltmann, Anne
Troxell, Sara A.
Schad, Julia
Fritze, Marcus
Bailey, Liam D.
Voigt, Christian C.
Czirják, Gábor Á.
description The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting due to the known role of bats as reservoirs for viruses and other intracellular pathogens, while being susceptible to extracellular microorganisms such as some bacteria and fungi. To better understand these discrepancies and the reservoir-competence of bats, we mimicked bacterial, viral and fungal infections in greater mouse-eared bats ( Myotis myotis ) and quantified different aspects of the APR over a two-day period. Individuals reacted most strongly to a viral (PolyI:C) and a bacterial (LPS) antigen, reflected by an increase of haptoglobin levels (LPS) and an increase of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PolyI:C and LPS). We did not detect fever, leukocytosis, body mass loss, or a change in the overall functioning of the innate immunity upon challenge with any antigen. We add evidence that bats respond selectively with APR to specific pathogens and that the activation of different parts of the immune system is species-specific.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_609ac5cc5ef74bc28a7b465cfce129e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_609ac5cc5ef74bc28a7b465cfce129e0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2712853654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiUuRCPgzcS5IqHxVKuICZ2tiT1KvsvZiJ0X997jZUloO-OAZed579oxfVT1n9A2jQr_NkqlO15Tzmmkuad08qo45larmgvPH9_Kj6iTnLS1L8U6y7ml1JBqqtaTquPr1wQ8DJgwWM_GBgF1mJPtLyEgS5n0MJZkj6cHOmDxMr8mwhBEmAsGRK5_WbPYjhpU_JoQCJLu4ZKwRErrCnTM5_XodZ5_Jbg2vnlVPBpgyntzGTfXj08fvZ1_qi2-fz8_eX9RWSTrXTGg2UOh73jkNCAwH3UjHed8P2jEnbOdaaB2zSjQcGlUa7noQTPG-cS0Vm-r8oOsibM0--R2kaxPBm_UgptFAmr2d0DS0A6usVTi0srdcQ9vLRtnBIuMd3mi9O2jtl36HzmKYS_sPRB9Wgr80Y7wynWwkF6wInN4KpPhzwTybnc8WpwkClnkZ3jKuSyNKFujLf6DbuKRQRrWiRPnKsm8qfkDZFHNOONw9hlFzYxNzsIkpNjGrTUxTSC_ut3FH-WOKAhAHQC6lMGL6e_d_ZH8DEaDJvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712352912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Seltmann, Anne ; Troxell, Sara A. ; Schad, Julia ; Fritze, Marcus ; Bailey, Liam D. ; Voigt, Christian C. ; Czirják, Gábor Á.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seltmann, Anne ; Troxell, Sara A. ; Schad, Julia ; Fritze, Marcus ; Bailey, Liam D. ; Voigt, Christian C. ; Czirják, Gábor Á.</creatorcontrib><description>The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting due to the known role of bats as reservoirs for viruses and other intracellular pathogens, while being susceptible to extracellular microorganisms such as some bacteria and fungi. To better understand these discrepancies and the reservoir-competence of bats, we mimicked bacterial, viral and fungal infections in greater mouse-eared bats ( Myotis myotis ) and quantified different aspects of the APR over a two-day period. Individuals reacted most strongly to a viral (PolyI:C) and a bacterial (LPS) antigen, reflected by an increase of haptoglobin levels (LPS) and an increase of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PolyI:C and LPS). We did not detect fever, leukocytosis, body mass loss, or a change in the overall functioning of the innate immunity upon challenge with any antigen. We add evidence that bats respond selectively with APR to specific pathogens and that the activation of different parts of the immune system is species-specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36088405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/2455 ; 631/250/262 ; Acute-Phase Reaction ; Animals ; Antigens ; Antigens, Viral ; Bacteria ; Bats ; Body mass ; Chiroptera - physiology ; Fever ; Haptoglobin ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Immune system ; Innate immunity ; Leukocytes (neutrophilic) ; Leukocytosis ; Lipopolysaccharides ; Lymphocytes ; Microorganisms ; multidisciplinary ; Myotis myotis ; Pathogens ; Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2022-09, Vol.12 (1), p.15259-15259, Article 15259</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. corrected publication 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. corrected publication 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2712352912/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2712352912?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seltmann, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxell, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritze, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Liam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Christian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czirják, Gábor Á.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting due to the known role of bats as reservoirs for viruses and other intracellular pathogens, while being susceptible to extracellular microorganisms such as some bacteria and fungi. To better understand these discrepancies and the reservoir-competence of bats, we mimicked bacterial, viral and fungal infections in greater mouse-eared bats ( Myotis myotis ) and quantified different aspects of the APR over a two-day period. Individuals reacted most strongly to a viral (PolyI:C) and a bacterial (LPS) antigen, reflected by an increase of haptoglobin levels (LPS) and an increase of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PolyI:C and LPS). We did not detect fever, leukocytosis, body mass loss, or a change in the overall functioning of the innate immunity upon challenge with any antigen. We add evidence that bats respond selectively with APR to specific pathogens and that the activation of different parts of the immune system is species-specific.</description><subject>631/158/2455</subject><subject>631/250/262</subject><subject>Acute-Phase Reaction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Chiroptera - physiology</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Haptoglobin</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Innate immunity</subject><subject>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</subject><subject>Leukocytosis</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Myotis myotis</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVkv_AAdkiUuRCPgzcS5IqHxVKuICZ2tiT1KvsvZiJ0X997jZUloO-OAZed579oxfVT1n9A2jQr_NkqlO15Tzmmkuad08qo45larmgvPH9_Kj6iTnLS1L8U6y7ml1JBqqtaTquPr1wQ8DJgwWM_GBgF1mJPtLyEgS5n0MJZkj6cHOmDxMr8mwhBEmAsGRK5_WbPYjhpU_JoQCJLu4ZKwRErrCnTM5_XodZ5_Jbg2vnlVPBpgyntzGTfXj08fvZ1_qi2-fz8_eX9RWSTrXTGg2UOh73jkNCAwH3UjHed8P2jEnbOdaaB2zSjQcGlUa7noQTPG-cS0Vm-r8oOsibM0--R2kaxPBm_UgptFAmr2d0DS0A6usVTi0srdcQ9vLRtnBIuMd3mi9O2jtl36HzmKYS_sPRB9Wgr80Y7wynWwkF6wInN4KpPhzwTybnc8WpwkClnkZ3jKuSyNKFujLf6DbuKRQRrWiRPnKsm8qfkDZFHNOONw9hlFzYxNzsIkpNjGrTUxTSC_ut3FH-WOKAhAHQC6lMGL6e_d_ZH8DEaDJvA</recordid><startdate>20220910</startdate><enddate>20220910</enddate><creator>Seltmann, Anne</creator><creator>Troxell, Sara A.</creator><creator>Schad, Julia</creator><creator>Fritze, Marcus</creator><creator>Bailey, Liam D.</creator><creator>Voigt, Christian C.</creator><creator>Czirják, Gábor Á.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220910</creationdate><title>Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)</title><author>Seltmann, Anne ; Troxell, Sara A. ; Schad, Julia ; Fritze, Marcus ; Bailey, Liam D. ; Voigt, Christian C. ; Czirják, Gábor Á.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>631/158/2455</topic><topic>631/250/262</topic><topic>Acute-Phase Reaction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Chiroptera - physiology</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Haptoglobin</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Innate immunity</topic><topic>Leukocytes (neutrophilic)</topic><topic>Leukocytosis</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Myotis myotis</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seltmann, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxell, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schad, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritze, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Liam D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Christian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czirják, Gábor Á.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seltmann, Anne</au><au>Troxell, Sara A.</au><au>Schad, Julia</au><au>Fritze, Marcus</au><au>Bailey, Liam D.</au><au>Voigt, Christian C.</au><au>Czirják, Gábor Á.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2022-09-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15259</spage><epage>15259</epage><pages>15259-15259</pages><artnum>15259</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>The acute phase response (APR) is an evolutionarily well-conserved part of the innate immune defense against pathogens. However, recent studies in bats yielded surprisingly diverse results compared to previous APR studies on both vertebrate and invertebrate species. This is especially interesting due to the known role of bats as reservoirs for viruses and other intracellular pathogens, while being susceptible to extracellular microorganisms such as some bacteria and fungi. To better understand these discrepancies and the reservoir-competence of bats, we mimicked bacterial, viral and fungal infections in greater mouse-eared bats ( Myotis myotis ) and quantified different aspects of the APR over a two-day period. Individuals reacted most strongly to a viral (PolyI:C) and a bacterial (LPS) antigen, reflected by an increase of haptoglobin levels (LPS) and an increase of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PolyI:C and LPS). We did not detect fever, leukocytosis, body mass loss, or a change in the overall functioning of the innate immunity upon challenge with any antigen. We add evidence that bats respond selectively with APR to specific pathogens and that the activation of different parts of the immune system is species-specific.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>36088405</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2022-09, Vol.12 (1), p.15259-15259, Article 15259
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_609ac5cc5ef74bc28a7b465cfce129e0
source Publicly Available Content Database; Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); PubMed Central; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/158/2455
631/250/262
Acute-Phase Reaction
Animals
Antigens
Antigens, Viral
Bacteria
Bats
Body mass
Chiroptera - physiology
Fever
Haptoglobin
Humanities and Social Sciences
Immune system
Innate immunity
Leukocytes (neutrophilic)
Leukocytosis
Lipopolysaccharides
Lymphocytes
Microorganisms
multidisciplinary
Myotis myotis
Pathogens
Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Differences in acute phase response to bacterial, fungal and viral antigens in greater mouse-eared bats (Myotis myotis)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A10%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20acute%20phase%20response%20to%20bacterial,%20fungal%20and%20viral%20antigens%20in%20greater%20mouse-eared%20bats%20(Myotis%20myotis)&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Seltmann,%20Anne&rft.date=2022-09-10&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15259&rft.epage=15259&rft.pages=15259-15259&rft.artnum=15259&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-022-18240-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2712853654%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-1381f0abb29d8aea1ef864d22bbf8d1d3c9d7a7d1c5362a652329ba3152b6d703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712352912&rft_id=info:pmid/36088405&rfr_iscdi=true