Loading…
Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation
Category: Lesser Toes; Other Introduction/Purpose: Retrospective study investigating patient reported outcomes and radiographic evaluation of crossed screws used in conjunction with a compressive nitinol staple (CS+S) for arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Dorsal plating (DP) gr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Foot & ankle orthopaedics 2024-12, Vol.9 (4) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Foot & ankle orthopaedics |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Arndt, Stephen R. Zahra, Shirin Moldavsky, Mark |
description | Category:
Lesser Toes; Other
Introduction/Purpose:
Retrospective study investigating patient reported outcomes and radiographic evaluation of crossed screws used in conjunction with a compressive nitinol staple (CS+S) for arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Dorsal plating (DP) group for 1st MTP joint was used for as control group.
Methods:
Pre-op and post-op Visual Analog Score (VAS) were assessed. Radiographic Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Interphalangeal Angle (IPA) Dorsiflexion Angle (DFA), and distance of fibular sesamoid (DFS) were measured pre-op and post-op. Student t-test assuming equal variance (p≤0.05) was performed to determine significance. Fusion was determined by assessing post operative radiographs.
Results:
DP Group had 40 patients, age 65.3±8.4, 12M, 28F, BMI 30.4±6.2. In the CS+S group 14 patients were included age 66.64±8.4, 5M, 9F, BMI 25.0±3.8. DP had a average follow up time of 4±3months with 95% fusion rate; CS+S had 100% fusion rate at an average follow up of 1.9±2months. Pre-op and Post-op DP and CS+S VAS scores were (7.9±0.9; 1.3±1) and (8.0±0.8; 0.7±0.9), respectively (p≤0.05).
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA and DFS for DP are 19.9±11.25o, 8.32±7.19o (p≤0.05); 11.41±4.58o, 9.09±3.23o (p≤0.05); 9.99±4.84o, 12.95±4.12o (p≤0.05); 22.59±9.21o, 23.71±7.41o (p≥0.05); and 12.82±2.65mm, 12.35±2.62mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA angles and DFS for CS+S are 21.71±10.5o, 5.57±5.08o (p≤0.05); 10.54±4.43o, 7.98±2.79o (p≤0.05); 11.99±6.28o, 14.47±5.22o (p≥0.05); 22.26±8.90o, 22.44±8.97o (p≥0.05); and 13.24±2.17mm, 12.13±1.56mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Both Cross Screw + Staple and Dorsal Plate groups result in significant improvements in VAS scores and radiographic parameters. The Cross Screw + Staple group had 100% fusion rate with significantly less follow up time compared to Dorsal Plate Group. Performing the procedure with Cross Screws + Staple has the benefits of a smaller incision, lower profile implant, less hardware irritation while providing continuous compression across the joint. potential benefits may be decreased OR room time and reduced hospital cost. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2473011424S00384 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_611f1a5ab5284afeb61b682ff6d1d97e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2473011424S00384</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_611f1a5ab5284afeb61b682ff6d1d97e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3153904087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2714-e4cf1f7f3a614e5031989af432208f46225c66326e2e1bec33230c0bd46c31953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ktFu0zAUhiMEEtPYPZeWuC742I6TcIOmso2hAdM6rq0T57h1lcbBdjt4Dl6YdJ2AIXFl6_f3f5bsUxQvgb8GqKo3QlWSAyihFpzLWj0pjvbRbJ89_Wv_vDhJac05h6psmro-Kn5-Djvq2TyGlNjCRrpjdz6v2CLj2BNzIbJzH1Nmn26v2cfgh8xOY17F0FHyic3DZsRIHcuBvQ8xYc-ue8w0lb5j9mF4y24oT_KRbPY7YvPeD95OGA4du8HOh2XEceUtO9thv73vvCieOewTnTysx8XX87Pb-YfZ1ZeLy_np1cyKCtSMlHXgKidRg6KSS2jqBp2SQvDaKS1EabWWQpMgaMlKKSS3vO2UthNbyuPi8uDtAq7NGP0G4w8T0Jv7IMSlwZi97cloAAdYYluKWqGjVkOra-Gc7qBrKppc7w6ucdtuqLM05Ij9I-njk8GvzDLsDICuZQ3NZHj1YIjh25ZSNuuwjcP0AEZCKRuueF1NFD9Qdv9jkdzvK4Cb_SyYf2dhqswOlYRL-iP9L_8L2lO0-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153904087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arndt, Stephen R. ; Zahra, Shirin ; Moldavsky, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Stephen R. ; Zahra, Shirin ; Moldavsky, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Category:
Lesser Toes; Other
Introduction/Purpose:
Retrospective study investigating patient reported outcomes and radiographic evaluation of crossed screws used in conjunction with a compressive nitinol staple (CS+S) for arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Dorsal plating (DP) group for 1st MTP joint was used for as control group.
Methods:
Pre-op and post-op Visual Analog Score (VAS) were assessed. Radiographic Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Interphalangeal Angle (IPA) Dorsiflexion Angle (DFA), and distance of fibular sesamoid (DFS) were measured pre-op and post-op. Student t-test assuming equal variance (p≤0.05) was performed to determine significance. Fusion was determined by assessing post operative radiographs.
Results:
DP Group had 40 patients, age 65.3±8.4, 12M, 28F, BMI 30.4±6.2. In the CS+S group 14 patients were included age 66.64±8.4, 5M, 9F, BMI 25.0±3.8. DP had a average follow up time of 4±3months with 95% fusion rate; CS+S had 100% fusion rate at an average follow up of 1.9±2months. Pre-op and Post-op DP and CS+S VAS scores were (7.9±0.9; 1.3±1) and (8.0±0.8; 0.7±0.9), respectively (p≤0.05).
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA and DFS for DP are 19.9±11.25o, 8.32±7.19o (p≤0.05); 11.41±4.58o, 9.09±3.23o (p≤0.05); 9.99±4.84o, 12.95±4.12o (p≤0.05); 22.59±9.21o, 23.71±7.41o (p≥0.05); and 12.82±2.65mm, 12.35±2.62mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA angles and DFS for CS+S are 21.71±10.5o, 5.57±5.08o (p≤0.05); 10.54±4.43o, 7.98±2.79o (p≤0.05); 11.99±6.28o, 14.47±5.22o (p≥0.05); 22.26±8.90o, 22.44±8.97o (p≥0.05); and 13.24±2.17mm, 12.13±1.56mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Both Cross Screw + Staple and Dorsal Plate groups result in significant improvements in VAS scores and radiographic parameters. The Cross Screw + Staple group had 100% fusion rate with significantly less follow up time compared to Dorsal Plate Group. Performing the procedure with Cross Screws + Staple has the benefits of a smaller incision, lower profile implant, less hardware irritation while providing continuous compression across the joint. potential benefits may be decreased OR room time and reduced hospital cost.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-0114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2473011424S00384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Hospital costs</subject><ispartof>Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024-12, Vol.9 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024 American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society, unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683819/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3153904087?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21946,25732,27832,27903,27904,36991,44569,44924,45312,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahra, Shirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldavsky, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><title>Foot & ankle orthopaedics</title><description>Category:
Lesser Toes; Other
Introduction/Purpose:
Retrospective study investigating patient reported outcomes and radiographic evaluation of crossed screws used in conjunction with a compressive nitinol staple (CS+S) for arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Dorsal plating (DP) group for 1st MTP joint was used for as control group.
Methods:
Pre-op and post-op Visual Analog Score (VAS) were assessed. Radiographic Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Interphalangeal Angle (IPA) Dorsiflexion Angle (DFA), and distance of fibular sesamoid (DFS) were measured pre-op and post-op. Student t-test assuming equal variance (p≤0.05) was performed to determine significance. Fusion was determined by assessing post operative radiographs.
Results:
DP Group had 40 patients, age 65.3±8.4, 12M, 28F, BMI 30.4±6.2. In the CS+S group 14 patients were included age 66.64±8.4, 5M, 9F, BMI 25.0±3.8. DP had a average follow up time of 4±3months with 95% fusion rate; CS+S had 100% fusion rate at an average follow up of 1.9±2months. Pre-op and Post-op DP and CS+S VAS scores were (7.9±0.9; 1.3±1) and (8.0±0.8; 0.7±0.9), respectively (p≤0.05).
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA and DFS for DP are 19.9±11.25o, 8.32±7.19o (p≤0.05); 11.41±4.58o, 9.09±3.23o (p≤0.05); 9.99±4.84o, 12.95±4.12o (p≤0.05); 22.59±9.21o, 23.71±7.41o (p≥0.05); and 12.82±2.65mm, 12.35±2.62mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA angles and DFS for CS+S are 21.71±10.5o, 5.57±5.08o (p≤0.05); 10.54±4.43o, 7.98±2.79o (p≤0.05); 11.99±6.28o, 14.47±5.22o (p≥0.05); 22.26±8.90o, 22.44±8.97o (p≥0.05); and 13.24±2.17mm, 12.13±1.56mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Both Cross Screw + Staple and Dorsal Plate groups result in significant improvements in VAS scores and radiographic parameters. The Cross Screw + Staple group had 100% fusion rate with significantly less follow up time compared to Dorsal Plate Group. Performing the procedure with Cross Screws + Staple has the benefits of a smaller incision, lower profile implant, less hardware irritation while providing continuous compression across the joint. potential benefits may be decreased OR room time and reduced hospital cost.</description><subject>Hospital costs</subject><issn>2473-0114</issn><issn>2473-0114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ktFu0zAUhiMEEtPYPZeWuC742I6TcIOmso2hAdM6rq0T57h1lcbBdjt4Dl6YdJ2AIXFl6_f3f5bsUxQvgb8GqKo3QlWSAyihFpzLWj0pjvbRbJ89_Wv_vDhJac05h6psmro-Kn5-Djvq2TyGlNjCRrpjdz6v2CLj2BNzIbJzH1Nmn26v2cfgh8xOY17F0FHyic3DZsRIHcuBvQ8xYc-ue8w0lb5j9mF4y24oT_KRbPY7YvPeD95OGA4du8HOh2XEceUtO9thv73vvCieOewTnTysx8XX87Pb-YfZ1ZeLy_np1cyKCtSMlHXgKidRg6KSS2jqBp2SQvDaKS1EabWWQpMgaMlKKSS3vO2UthNbyuPi8uDtAq7NGP0G4w8T0Jv7IMSlwZi97cloAAdYYluKWqGjVkOra-Gc7qBrKppc7w6ucdtuqLM05Ij9I-njk8GvzDLsDICuZQ3NZHj1YIjh25ZSNuuwjcP0AEZCKRuueF1NFD9Qdv9jkdzvK4Cb_SyYf2dhqswOlYRL-iP9L_8L2lO0-Q</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Arndt, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Zahra, Shirin</creator><creator>Moldavsky, Mark</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</title><author>Arndt, Stephen R. ; Zahra, Shirin ; Moldavsky, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2714-e4cf1f7f3a614e5031989af432208f46225c66326e2e1bec33230c0bd46c31953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Hospital costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arndt, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahra, Shirin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldavsky, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Foot & ankle orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arndt, Stephen R.</au><au>Zahra, Shirin</au><au>Moldavsky, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Foot & ankle orthopaedics</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2473-0114</issn><eissn>2473-0114</eissn><abstract>Category:
Lesser Toes; Other
Introduction/Purpose:
Retrospective study investigating patient reported outcomes and radiographic evaluation of crossed screws used in conjunction with a compressive nitinol staple (CS+S) for arthrodesis of the 1st metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. Dorsal plating (DP) group for 1st MTP joint was used for as control group.
Methods:
Pre-op and post-op Visual Analog Score (VAS) were assessed. Radiographic Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA), Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA), Interphalangeal Angle (IPA) Dorsiflexion Angle (DFA), and distance of fibular sesamoid (DFS) were measured pre-op and post-op. Student t-test assuming equal variance (p≤0.05) was performed to determine significance. Fusion was determined by assessing post operative radiographs.
Results:
DP Group had 40 patients, age 65.3±8.4, 12M, 28F, BMI 30.4±6.2. In the CS+S group 14 patients were included age 66.64±8.4, 5M, 9F, BMI 25.0±3.8. DP had a average follow up time of 4±3months with 95% fusion rate; CS+S had 100% fusion rate at an average follow up of 1.9±2months. Pre-op and Post-op DP and CS+S VAS scores were (7.9±0.9; 1.3±1) and (8.0±0.8; 0.7±0.9), respectively (p≤0.05).
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA and DFS for DP are 19.9±11.25o, 8.32±7.19o (p≤0.05); 11.41±4.58o, 9.09±3.23o (p≤0.05); 9.99±4.84o, 12.95±4.12o (p≤0.05); 22.59±9.21o, 23.71±7.41o (p≥0.05); and 12.82±2.65mm, 12.35±2.62mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Pre and post-op HVA, IMA, IPA, DFA angles and DFS for CS+S are 21.71±10.5o, 5.57±5.08o (p≤0.05); 10.54±4.43o, 7.98±2.79o (p≤0.05); 11.99±6.28o, 14.47±5.22o (p≥0.05); 22.26±8.90o, 22.44±8.97o (p≥0.05); and 13.24±2.17mm, 12.13±1.56mm (p≥0.05) respectively.
Conclusion:
Both Cross Screw + Staple and Dorsal Plate groups result in significant improvements in VAS scores and radiographic parameters. The Cross Screw + Staple group had 100% fusion rate with significantly less follow up time compared to Dorsal Plate Group. Performing the procedure with Cross Screws + Staple has the benefits of a smaller incision, lower profile implant, less hardware irritation while providing continuous compression across the joint. potential benefits may be decreased OR room time and reduced hospital cost.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2473011424S00384</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2473-0114 |
ispartof | Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024-12, Vol.9 (4) |
issn | 2473-0114 2473-0114 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_611f1a5ab5284afeb61b682ff6d1d97e |
source | SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Hospital costs |
title | Novel Cross Screw with Staple for First MTP Joint Arthrodesis Compared to Dorsal Plate Fixation: Retrospective Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20Cross%20Screw%20with%20Staple%20for%20First%20MTP%20Joint%20Arthrodesis%20Compared%20to%20Dorsal%20Plate%20Fixation:%20Retrospective%20Clinical%20and%20Radiographic%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Arndt,%20Stephen%20R.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2473-0114&rft.eissn=2473-0114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2473011424S00384&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3153904087%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2714-e4cf1f7f3a614e5031989af432208f46225c66326e2e1bec33230c0bd46c31953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153904087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2473011424S00384&rfr_iscdi=true |