Life beyond the Tanimoto coefficient: similarity measures for interaction fingerprints

• Published in: Journal of cheminformatics 2018-10, Vol.10 (1), p.48-12, Article 48
• Main Authors: Rácz, Anita, Bajusz, Dávid, Héberger, Károly
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; ANOVA; Binding; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Computational Biology/Bioinformatics; Computer Applications in Chemistry; Configurations; Data integration; Docking; Documentation and Information in Chemistry; Drug development; Drug discovery; Filtration; Fingerprints; FPKit; Interaction fingerprint; Mathematical analysis; Metric spaces; Multisensor fusion; Proteins; Research Article; Screening; Similarity; Similarity measures; Similarity metrics; SRD; Statistical analysis; Statistical tests; Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Variance analysis; Virtual screening
• ISSN: 1758-2946; 1758-2946
• DOI: 10.1186/s13321-018-0302-y

Background Interaction fingerprints (IFP) have been repeatedly shown to be valuable tools in virtual screening to identify novel hit compounds that can subsequently be optimized to drug candidates. As a complementary method to ligand docking, IFPs can be applied to quantify the similarity of predicted binding poses to a reference binding pose. For this purpose, a large number of similarity metrics can be applied, and various parameters of the IFPs themselves can be customized. In a large-scale comparison, we have assessed the effect of similarity metrics and IFP configurations to a number of virtual screening scenarios with ten different protein targets and thousands of molecules. Particularly, the effect of considering general interaction definitions (such as Any Contact, Backbone Interaction and Sidechain Interaction), the effect of filtering methods and the different groups of similarity metrics were studied. Results The performances were primarily compared based on AUC values, but we have also used the original similarity data for the comparison of similarity metrics with several statistical tests and the novel, robust sum of ranking differences (SRD) algorithm. With SRD, we can evaluate the consistency (or concordance) of the various similarity metrics to an ideal reference metric, which is provided by data fusion from the existing metrics. Different aspects of IFP configurations and similarity metrics were examined based on SRD values with analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Conclusion A general approach is provided that can be applied for the reliable interpretation and usage of similarity measures with interaction fingerprints. Metrics that are viable alternatives to the commonly used Tanimoto coefficient were identified based on a comparison with an ideal reference metric (consensus). A careful selection of the applied bits (interaction definitions) and IFP filtering rules can improve the results of virtual screening (in terms of their agreement with the consensus metric). The open-source Python package FPKit was introduced for the similarity calculations and IFP filtering; it is available at: https://github.com/davidbajusz/fpkit .